Jump to content

ATWT Friday November 30


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Is anyone else wondering why Gwen adopting Sofie's baby is seen as such a bad thing? It's a legal adoption, right? Other than Cole pressuring Sophie into something she doesn't want to do, who cares where it comes from? I could understand Aaron and Ali's concerns if they were focused on how much Sophie wants to keep her child. But as usual, it seems like everyone's more concerned about Will and Gwen.

Nice to see Nancy, even if it was to impart some more advice into Katie's empty head.

Carly was funny today..."you are woman. Hear you roar." And then telling Jack she invited Kit to live with her so he could feel superior.

The entire Katie thing...snoozeville. Brad is officially a schmuck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I also loved Carly's lines to Jack. I thought for a moment she was going to call him a jackass. :lol: The Gwen baby storyline is only interesting because of Babs being involved.

Next week looks good. Rosanna out of coma?? :P And Bob and Kim are on. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I hope Rosanna leaves Oakdale and tells Paul to [!@#$%^&*] off! Instead of going back into the coma.

The Bob stuff will be interesting. I have read spoilers. It looks like a real touching Christmas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

So what's the deal with Nancy taking dancing lessons? Each time we see her, she's sitting down in a chair.

The only significance I see in the adoption story is that Sophie is being pressured into something she doesn't want to do. I loved how Barbara snuck into a room to confer with Cole. It looked like she was off to have a quickie!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Imagine the possibilities if Mary was the politically correct moral center of the Loves and clashed with Donna over her snobby socialite tendencies (once the re-recast was done).
    • Show starts soon. Wonder if we will get the Voice saying "The role of Ted Richardson is now being played by Keith Robinson" and if they'll update the intro
    • I initially thought BTG was going for the Duprees being (somewhat) like the Kennedy family- wealthy and politically influential. And Martin's accident being like how Chappaquiddick (Link) caused Ted Kennedy to cancel his plans to run for president in the 1970s.  (He ran in 1980 but didn't get the nomination). But now it seems to have more layers that that, so I have no idea.
    • The episodes uploaded today by the YT channel have been done through the end of November 1985 and what a mess we have in the Liza/Sunny/Hogan/Lloyd/Estelle story. I think it would have been easier to gradually bring Hogan/Sunny back together.. maybe even addressing the toxic situation and trying to work through it.   Unrelated to all that, I see that Gary Tomlin has attempted to reset the show to where it was when he left at the end of 1983.  He really seems obsessed with regressing Wendy as a character after the progress/evolution of her character post 1983.. with her sleeping with her mother's new boyfriend.   Based on what I've watched of the show online... the one consistency was the mother/daughter relationship between Stephanie/Wendy... and even though Stephanie was recast, I think violating that relationship was a mistake. I can see why Tomlin didn't last long in this stint as head writer.  
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • Please register in order to view this content

    • I don't think that would be the reason tbh. Thinking about it, it's probably storyline related - I could see bio mom / dad eventually turning up (or maybe it's June as speculated) and wanting the children back. I could also see it being a part of the fall-out of Martin's secret being revealed now that he's backed down from a presidential campaign - his and Smitty's ability to be parents comes into question, which the bio parents use. They might've wanted the kids to be at a age where they could reliably speak for themselves what they prefer, but also have enough memories of their bio parent(s) not doing a good job. I'd also think that they might want to avoid having the image of this gay couple keeping a mother away from her small children, as it might skew the viewer to sympathise too much in one direction. 
    • Something self-defense is my guess, and I have a feeling maybe he was protecting someone close to him and the optics looked bad so Vernon/Anita covered it up (my guess maybe he was protecting Vernon/Anita).
    • If Reginald had had more dimensions he probably wouldn't have been killed off and Carl might not have been brought back to fill the international supervillain role. I think though that the Loves were also severely damaged by the way Nicole and Peter were made iredeemable and written out. I definitely feel that loss more than the loss of Reginald, primarily since they were good characters to begin with and were only ruined during this period.   
    • What if they were originally cast as Vanessa and Doug's twins and then were moved to Samantha/Tyrell when the show decided to delay introducing the twins? It's a shame they didn't stick with the original plan. BTW, does anybody have any new speculation on what Martin's secret will be? Brandon is hinting nobody is guessing it. Initially I thought it would be something where he was drunk and killed somebody or something like that but now I'm feeling like maybe it wasn't completely his fault. I don't get the vibe they're going to take him in a dark direction anymore.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy