Jump to content

ATWT Thursday November 15


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Let's see..hmmmm...Evan has to be the evil one. Ummm....Luke and Noah are having problems. Chris sleeps with Luke. Luke becomes pregnant. Who is the daddy? Chris or Noah? Evan wanting Chris for himself. He decides to switch the baby results. Which makes Noah the father of Luke's baby. :rolleyes::P:lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 21
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

...But then Noah and Chris have a fight and Noah winds up falling off a cliff into the unknown, presumed dead. Evan moves heaven and Earth to make sure Chris and Luke stay apart in the meantime. :D

How about a mention of the best line today? "After I vomit..." as uttered by Lucinda.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The thing is, the Dusty/Lily stuff was so long ago, no one GAS. I barely remember Dusty was her first, if they hadn't reaired that "classic" episode. I really don't think Mabel's was "their" place....but I didn't listen to half their drivel-ish reminescing anyway. He made a comment about beating up her boyfriend, and I assumed he laid Holden out...which he probably did at some point. Those were the days when guys traded punches. Nowadays, someone gets ONE sucker punch in, and it's a "fight".

Boy...I feel bad for MP, having to continually be a sanctimonious priss in this story. TIIC had better start writing him some "revelations" about himself, because this is getting old. Jack admitted to Carly his marriage wasn't ending because she got ill, it was ending because of his feelings for her. For someone who values the truth, he lies himself when it's conveinent. Carly's lies are one thing...but Jack needs to understand "truth" isn't some guarantee of "love". If it was, he never would have left Katie's side during this...Katie hasn't really lied to him at all. (I think she has, but admittedly, it's nothing on the scale of what Carly does.) If he had been honest about his feelings months ago, or even WEEKS ago, there would have been no reason for Carly to lie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Mabel's never existed back then. It was not their place. I dont think they even had a place. And did Lily say Lucinda was against them being together? Or was she referring to Holden? Because she WANTED Dusty with Lily. Seriously the script was horrible for Dusty and Lily. The history was made up from the writer's ass. :rolleyes:

Now, I know why MP spoke up. He must be really frustrated with the repetitive garbage he is getting to play out. Jack has seriously become one big jerk. I ask myself why would Carly want him??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I know what you mean. I just don't like this "Jack" at all. And he's gotta be hating it because it doesnt' even seem like him. You almost want Carly to say enough already...screw off!! lol

And the way those kids get moved from house to house is crazy. For someone who keeps preaching about loving his kids so much he sure puts them through alot of hell. I hope they fix his character soon because I for one hate not liking Jack.

Also I loved Dusty and Lily today. Was nice to see Lily smiling and having sex for pete sake. Same for Dusty. And I think they have great chemistry, better than Dusty and Emily.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm not sure when Mabel's first appeared, but it was definitely around that time. The Snyder children would go there, but it was a "summer only" kind of place. And as for Lucinda, she has a habit of embracing Lily's previous boyfriends, when Lily moves on to someone new. So, by the time Dusty didn't have a prayer with Lily, I'm sure he looked better than Holden-the Stable Boy.

Sigh...I don't know why TIIC have made Jack such an ass. It's like he's continually throwing a temper tantrum. He wants to believe that the relationship with Fluffy was so perfect, it would have lasted forever, had Carly not lied. That marriage hit the skids because Jack kissed Carly. And frankly the Kack thing was all about Jack bulldozing his way over Katie's usually very sensible protests.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Show starts soon. Wonder if we will get the Voice saying "The role of Ted Richardson is now being played by Keith Robinson" and if they'll update the intro
    • I initially thought BTG was going for the Duprees being (somewhat) like the Kennedy family- wealthy and politically influential. And Martin's accident being like how Chappaquiddick (Link) caused Ted Kennedy to cancel his plans to run for president in the 1970s. But now it seems to have more layers that that, so I have no idea.
    • The episodes uploaded today by the YT channel have been done through the end of November 1985 and what a mess we have in the Liza/Sunny/Hogan/Lloyd/Estelle story. I think it would have been easier to gradually bring Hogan/Sunny back together.. maybe even addressing the toxic situation and trying to work through it.   Unrelated to all that, I see that Gary Tomlin has attempted to reset the show to where it was when he left at the end of 1983.  He really seems obsessed with regressing Wendy as a character after the progress/evolution of her character post 1983.. with her sleeping with her mother's new boyfriend.   Based on what I've watched of the show online... the one consistency was the mother/daughter relationship between Stephanie/Wendy... and even though Stephanie was recast, I think violating that relationship was a mistake. I can see why Tomlin didn't last long in this stint as head writer.  
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • Please register in order to view this content

    • I don't think that would be the reason tbh. Thinking about it, it's probably storyline related - I could see bio mom / dad eventually turning up (or maybe it's June as speculated) and wanting the children back. I could also see it being a part of the fall-out of Martin's secret being revealed now that he's backed down from a presidential campaign - his and Smitty's ability to be parents comes into question, which the bio parents use. They might've wanted the kids to be at a age where they could reliably speak for themselves what they prefer, but also have enough memories of their bio parent(s) not doing a good job. I'd also think that they might want to avoid having the image of this gay couple keeping a mother away from her small children, as it might skew the viewer to sympathise too much in one direction. 
    • Something self-defense is my guess, and I have a feeling maybe he was protecting someone close to him and the optics looked bad so Vernon/Anita covered it up (my guess maybe he was protecting Vernon/Anita).
    • If Reginald had had more dimensions he probably wouldn't have been killed off and Carl might not have been brought back to fill the international supervillain role. I think though that the Loves were also severely damaged by the way Nicole and Peter were made iredeemable and written out. I definitely feel that loss more than the loss of Reginald, primarily since they were good characters to begin with and were only ruined during this period.   
    • What if they were originally cast as Vanessa and Doug's twins and then were moved to Samantha/Tyrell when the show decided to delay introducing the twins? It's a shame they didn't stick with the original plan. BTW, does anybody have any new speculation on what Martin's secret will be? Brandon is hinting nobody is guessing it. Initially I thought it would be something where he was drunk and killed somebody or something like that but now I'm feeling like maybe it wasn't completely his fault. I don't get the vibe they're going to take him in a dark direction anymore.
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy