Jump to content

Rev. Jerry Falwell dies at 73


Ryan

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 32
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

He made mistakes. We all do. He didn't take a gun out and kill dissenters and critics, though. He wasn't an "awful" person, and I don't believe anyone is truly "awful."

Of course, liberal rhetoric about accepting others and being open-minded (even if that means allowing people their right to be what one feels is closeminded) just works the ONE way, doesn't it?

Isn't that funny?

Or more, strange.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well according to you, Bin Laden dying will be a tradegy too, because it IS a death, right? ;) This was a horrible man. I will not say I am glad he is dead, but I will say that I wasn't considerably happy when he was alive and talking his [!@#$%^&*].

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I won't sit here and say I wished this guy dead.... but I don't think it should be considered tragic in the grand scheme of things that this bigot is dead. My sympathies go out to the people who did care about him such as his family but I don't think there will be one person in the gay community shedding a tear over his death, certainly not me. To say feminists. gays, abortion rights people brought on something such as 9/11, well there is no going back from that. He is a major reason behind the mixing of the religious right and mainstream american politics.... and look where the state of conservative politics is right now in the USA. Its a mess. I can only hope they chose a candidate that can take that party back to its roots, where it belongs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Bin Laden would be a justifiable death, even in the religious sense, because he is evil personified. And more important, violent and has caused the ruin of countless lives.

Falwell, on the ohter hand, could only be regarded, by his detractors, as "misguided," if they disagree with his views. He was not violent; he just expressed views. He was fodder for late night skeetch comedy shows and talk shows, but that doesn't mean he was someone to be feared or hated. He was controversial, but often his words were turned against him. His words were, clearly, unintentionally hate speech, at times, but also, he clearly never chose or wished to start a riot.

The two situations are different. THis man certainly doesn't deserve King's "Irish jig" comment. That was just in poor taste. (To King), how would you like it if someone said as much of your grave? It's just a heartless thing to say. And because of fate, karma, etc, someone probably will say it about you. And trust me, that's not a good thing!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

No, the world is just without one other person who stands in front of the liberal agenda.

And since he's not a terrorist, that's another example of liberals not being truly liberal and letting the free marketplace of ideas flow. Exchanging different ideas, hearing and tolerating different perspectives.

It really isn't a two-way street, is it?

He didn't spew "hate;" he said what he believed. Just like you say what you believe, I say what I believe. We put it on the table and strip ourselves, prepared for criticism. Unfortunately, he invited some to exhibit true hatred through their intolerance of opposing, nonviolent views.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Good riddance! The guy was pure evil. Some televangelists believe in what they say and preach, but not this guy. He was a hippocrate. He pulled a big one on Jim & Tammy Bakker during their fall. He mislead and lied to them in order to get his dirty hands on PTL. Despite Jim Bakker's tryst with Jessica Hahn and his lavish lifestyle, I think he believed in the things he said (even if he didn't always follow it himself). I don't believe the same thing can be said of Jerry Falwell. I can't really think of anything nice to say about him and I believe he has caused great harm to this country. He may not have blown anyone up, but he was certainly a terroist with his words and deeds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

With all due respect, death is death. You can't place a barometer on how others should react when you've openly admitted that you will disregard the death of Bin Laden. It's either a time for mourning and withholding one's peace or being able to express an outright joy. It can't be both because of your sole discretion.

For many of us, such as myself, Falwell was just as negligent and grossly malignant in his rhetoric. He was a zealot that cultivated hate. And yes, I am a member of that dreaded "liberal", tree hugging demographic. By all means, say your peace, but Falwell actively purused an agenda of discrimiantion and oppression simply because of his views. He saw the world a certain way and took it upon himself to damn those who stood in ocnstrast, looking the other way as his minions did exert violence to bring about his righteous vision. A leader chastises not only those who stray from the flock, but more importantly those in his covenant that supercede the natural law of free will. You can't initmidate, browbeat and kill as a means of conversion, but Falwell never minded. He lusted for power, orchestrating a takeover of Jim Baker's coalition in the aftermath of his scandal. This man wanted ownership of minds, thoughts and souls; those who refused were immediately cast out.

And last time I checked, the Bible said that a wise men was to discern but not cast upon judgment which is what he did for all the days of his lives. The God he served was about inclusion and not the exclusionary division he invested his minstry in. This man appointed himself as God, venomously preached his manifesto and shunned everyone else for his name's sake on the altar of Falwell said so.The Bible said to beware of false prophets and I would categorize him as such. I don't deny people of faith their beliefs, but he deliberately sanctioned the silence and practice of others.

As I stated before and would like to reiterate now, I'm not celebrating his passing, but I'm not going to cannonize the man simply because he claimed to be a man of God when he lived his life with extreme fallacy of the teachings he venerated. It's just not going to happen. My only consellation is that there is one true God that will judge me when the span of my days comes to an end and zealots like Falwell who have pronounced me damned because I don't blindly follow their credo.

It's sad that he died, but I won't bow to his memory. You can call me a liberal or whatever, but I won't be eulogizing him. He was bigot yesterday and he's a bigot, idelogical and social terorist still.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well said Stephanie.

I also want to comment on the engaging and thoughtful discussion going on in this thread. It's nice to be able to speak your mind without being jumped on. The better discussions like these happen, the more they'll be able to be discussed :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Hello to everybody!

      Please register in order to view this content

      I'm writing a series of essays about the first time of a LGBT character in US soaps. I already have datas about Sharon Duvall in DAYS (1977) as first Bisex, Lynn Carson in AMC (1983) as first Lesbian, Hank Elliott on ATWT (1989) as first Gay (someone have or can find the episode in which Paul Ryan finds out about Hank and does not take it very well? I have seen Hank's coming out to Iva and when Hank gets a bullet to save Paul's life from the latter evil father and when he gets tested for HIV after finding out Charlie's diagnosis, but Soap Opera Digest recaps are too much concises...) and Billy Douglas on OLTL (1992) as first LGBT teen in both daytime and primetime TV (I have seen all the episodes on You Tube. BTW, what a great storyline, why it was ignored by the Emmys? Andrew Carpenter and Billy's father players are both really great in their roles! Oh, well, if OLTL was not nominated for Best Drama in 1994 with Marty's gang rape story which won four major awards and was spectacular, no surprise at all - sadly) and I have read something about Azure in The City (1996) as first Trans, but I'd like to see the episode where Bernado finds out and Azure confirms what is said in that newspaper to have something to quote. I like quoting, it gives the essays more depth. I already read the biweekly recaps from Soap Opera Digest on Tumblr and single episodes recaps on IMDB, but I'd like to have more to write about. And something more about critics and public opinions - I only knows that the storyline was rapidly axed because of bad writing and bad performance by Carlotta Chung, but I have nothing to quote.   PS Thank you @JAS0N47 for your incredible and rich site (and work on it). In particular for the Nielsen ratings on weekly basis lists since 1974 and for everything about Sharon Duval - specially for the script of the confession episode dated 23 May 1977! I'm not a DAYS viewers (I'm Italian, I live in Italy and on You Tube there is almost nothing if not short videos), but I've seen some clips of Marlena's first possession (Deidre Hall is terrific in it! Storyline is garbage, but it has its chilling moments and it is funny - I laugh everytime I remember Kristen say to Marlena "according to the book of demonology"! Was she an espert of demons or what!? ) and read on Soap Opera Central daily recaps about infamous Melaswen (brainwashed Marlena has a particular sense of humor - killing ex alcoholic Maggie with a bottle of wine and Alice with her donuts...), so I know something about the soap. Little, but better than nothing.
    • May 14, Asher Antonyzyn (Danny) interview

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I'm curious the motivation for keeping Bela on beyond the circus story arc.  Did he play a character like his character on EON, or was he more of a good guy? I know he ended up with Sunny at the end of the series, but I always thought that Sunny/Hogan could have been revived once the lack of chemistry between him and the NuLiza became apparent.   Actually... the NuLiza (Louan Gideon) reminded me more of Sunny than she did Liza as played by Sherry... and she just threw off the whole vibe of the show. I see Estelle has just arrived in the late October 1985 episodes, which only means that Wendy and Stephanie are soon on their way out.   It also appears that the Sarah/Quinn/Wendy triangle was set up by Mayer.. and it looks as though Tomlin is going to deactivate it by the introduction of Colleen Dion's character.   I don't understand why no one on the show thought to look at Quinn and realize that he was the problem and write him out.
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • I kind of assume they're toning down Rachel's bad seed tendencies a bit to make it less obvious if they're going for her as the shooter. At least that's what I hope they're doing - I've really enjoyed Rachel being a bratty evil DiMera princess and Marlena finally getting a grandchild she deserves. 
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Jason and hemming and hawing about Sidwell taking over and being ruthless

      Please register in order to view this content

      . This show is so stupid. Sonny killed an FBI agent less than a year ago by shooting him at point blank range. But the new short bald man is much much worse cause he was a bad guy in some part of Africa and managed to not kill Lucky, Isaiah, Jason, or Anna. This show is crippled by the mob all these years after Guza has been long gone.    Laura is literally saying oooo but Sonny is a good mobster for Port Charles. Give me a [!@#$%^&*].ing break. Sometimes I don’t know why I watch this joke of a show.
    • With all the changes Sunny was one of the longest running characters by that time.  She had never been married and had heaps of story potential. I can see America getting with SFT -you know 'the circus soap'. Smart move because circuses were all the rage with the kids in the 80's. Maybe Stu and Jo could have bought the circus.
    • It is actually pathetic, that Victor’s 50 year old children are still written as scared of this man that has to sit in every scene. I get it, EB has been on the show for almost 50 years, but I don’t care. He’s a man in his 80’s and should not be the damn lead and driving force because you don’t want to upset Eric Braeden ‘s fragile ego that only exists because the writers have cowtowed to this man for so long.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy