Jump to content

OLTL: A Little insulted


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Speaking as a gay man, I think OLTL should have explained that gay men are not the only people that get AIDS. Instead the whole AIDS benefit seems tawdry and stupis. I can't believe that once upon a time ABC Daytime had Cindy Chandler's story, Stone's story on GH and Billy's story on OLTL. No more of that socially relevant "nonsense" for ABC Daytime it seems.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 15
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I viewed it more as Rex being so inexplicably stupid, that he would out a man on national television and also to show how little he actually knows about AIDS and HIV.

What a friggin moron. I hated that whole thing. It made me uncomfortable to watch it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think it was just the usual lack of creativity. Rex and "Uncle Bo' proved popular at the gay bar during the Daniel story so Higley is revisiting that scenario. Just another opportunity to indulge JPL with "Tate Harmon: Pitcher or Catcher?" jokes. He really needs a strong director because he's not nearly as adorable as he and the show think he is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't think it was meant to offend either, but Higley's choice to make Rex's little AIDS get together a GAY only benefit sends the message that only gay men can suffer from the disease. Unfortunately, alot of ppl still are very ignorant to not only HIV and AIDS, but to homosexuality. Even if Higley's approach was to only make Rex seem ignorant (which I don't buy that he would be THIS ignorant), it still sends the wrong message.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm a straight female, with some gay friends and relatives, and I was also insulted by Higley's treatment of this story. (But why should this one be any different? I'm insulted by almost every other storyline she's responsible for.)

I heard Adrianna say to Rex yesterday that they both had gay friends. Well, that was a surprise to me--why do we never see them?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Jenn was a huge part of the success of Days back in the day, and that contribution shouldn't be dismissed.  With that said, I do think her and Jack's time on the show should remain as occasional visits/drop ins. When Missy returns to play Jenn, Jenn is back to being Jenn.   Jenn in her glory days was head strong, fiesty, and was a live wire.... and her scenes with Jack on Friday was classic Jenn with Jack being the voice of reason.   It was the foundation of their relationship back in the day.    
    • Claire was always tightly wound, I think what Long was going to do is to throw the three into this impossible situation with no bad guys, Mo, knowing how to take care of kids from growing up but unable to conceive and Claire, who didnt know how to take care of kids and was totally focused on her career, gets knocked up.  Ryder took Claire off the deep end as a convenient way to make story for characters he wasnt interested in (though Pratt blames McTavish) with little effort. It was later explained to be a brain tumor (though why was she a bitch again when she returned?) \ Claire did sleep with Rick, she was his first!
    • I'm sorry, truly I am, but this literally made me LOL. Tempting fate, much?

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Oh, I have very little doubt that Missy feels some way personally and privately.  Donna was just saying she actively spoke out against Days in public in reference to the gay storylines, which she did not. I don't have super strong feeling about Jen one way or another.  She was always a side character to me.  I still think Missy is Jen regardless of her stupid beliefs.
    • I hated the swap-over; Clayton Norcross, to me, was far superior in the role of Thorne than Jeff Trachta ever was. And the recast left me disliking Thorne when he was the superior son to me. As for Teri Ann Linn, I feel like she got the raw deal. Kristen was very clear as a forefronting character, especially in her rivalry with Stephanie, and it feels like she was dropped off for Felicia, and they never returned it. Not to mention the subpar recast with Tracy Melchior in 2001. Someone like Brenda Epperson (ex-Ashley, Y&R) would've been more suited for that role.
    • I just remember when Leo was marrying Craig (?), Greg Rikaart stated a line and made direct eye-contact with Melissa Reeves, and when the camera cut to her, she looked away. 

      Please register in order to view this content

       Rikaart had a mission that day, and he succeeded.
    • I need to go and find less.
    • Scroll to page 2 and there it is.    
    • Very cool!  Thanks for sharing! Haha love it - thanks for sharing!
    • There probably isn't-
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy