Jump to content

Ever wonder how new shows are picked?


Sylph

Recommended Posts

  • Members

http://www.mercurynews.com/portlet/article...&siteId=568

Ever wonder how new shows are picked?

NETWORKS SEEK FRESH IDEAS AMID CHAOTIC FRENZY

By Charlie McCollum

Mercury News

San Jose Mercury News

Article Launched:

In the world of TV, there's an annual high-stakes craps game. Millions of dollars are wagered, and there's just a handful of winners.

As you read this, pilots (essentially sample episodes) of 112 new dramas and comedies are in various stages of production, with thousands of studio executives, producers, writers, directors and actors hoping their projects will make it onto the networks' fall schedules. Fewer than a third will make the cut; even fewer of those that do will last for more than a season.

It's a game that has been going on since the dawn of network TV more than 50 years ago - and one that almost none of those involved really feels is the best way to ensure that really good television gets on the air, that the best choices are made.

"When you develop an industry over 50 years, there's a lot of institutional memory that's very hard to change," says Ted Harbert, the former head of ABC Entertainment and now CEO of cable's Comcast Entertainment Group.

While the pilot process comes down to an intense four-month period early each year, it actually begins as each new TV season unfolds in the fall. As soon as network executives debut their new lineups, Harbert says, "all the writers and agents in Hollywood come to them and say, `All your new shows suck, and we've got to sell you all new shows because most of them are going to fail.'"

It is a grinding process in which literally thousands of "pitches" - ideas - are presented to executives in hopes that they'll agree to order scripts that could lead to full-blown series. Nina Tassler, now president of CBS Entertainment, says she used to hear 300 to 400 pitches each fall when she was the network's head of drama development.

The executives say they are looking for fresh ideas, shows with original visions.

"When you get a script like `Heroes,' a very unique concept, you can make a clear decision," says Angela Bromstad, president of NBC Universal Studios. "But when you get a really good cop procedural and there are 10 others in development, maybe you don't do that show."

But writers say that, too often, it's a guessing game of what networks are looking for - what the hot (and often derivative) concept of the moment might be.

"If you see a show like `Lost' succeed, miraculously drama writers have shows about people in a small town who are cut off from everybody or who are in a boat and cut off from everybody," says Bill Lawrence, the creator of NBC's "Scrubs."

Exactly that happened before the start of the current season, when networks were scrambling to find a new high-concept, serialized show in the style of "Lost." The result was a glut of such dramas, most of which bombed.

Some writers simply bypass the pitch process and write scripts on "spec." Even though they don't get paid, they come to the networks with fully developed projects in hand. It took Marc Cherry, the creator of "Desperate Housewives," more than two years, two agents, 17 rewrites and a shift in format (from half-hour sitcom to hour-long soap opera) to get his series on the air.

But "for me, it was essential to do the work on my own and just walk in with the finished product so that the show was done, the vision was done," Cherry says. "It wasn't just an idea. They could see the tonality. They could see the characters and everything."

Exceptions to rule

Occasionally, a show will jump directly to a network schedule on the basis of the concept, a script and the track record of those involved.

Last year, it was "Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip," created by Aaron Sorkin of "The West Wing," and "The Class," co-created by David Crane of "Friends." This year, "Back to You," a comedy about life at a local TV station, already has been picked up by Fox on the strength of its writers (led by Christopher Lloyd of "Frasier") and lead actors (Kelsey Grammer and Patricia Heaton).

In addition, a new series spawned from an existing hit show (the "CSI" and "Law & Order" franchises in past years) tend to get special treatment. This year, a spinoff of "Grey's Anatomy" built around Addison Shepherd (Kate Walsh) is all but certain to make the ABC fall lineup. (It still will do a pilot, to air as an episode of the original series next month.)

Most shows follow a more traditional path, and once the orders for scripts are given - usually in November - there is a mad scramble by writers to get them done and back into the executives' hands.

"Writers get pushed to get a pilot script in before the holidays in hopes of an early pickup and a jump on casting," Lawrence says. "Then you hand it in and you wait to hear what people think. You feel like you're chasing a brass ring that doesn't really exist."

And, adds Jenny Bicks, executive producer of "Men In Trees," "you're asking for executives to read your script with a fresh eye when they most likely have read, at that point, hundreds of things."

By late December or early January, the game is really on as the networks choose which pilots actually are going to be filmed. Particularly with dramas, that's no small commitment. Since "Lost" did its splashy two-hour, $14 million-plus pilot in 2004, costs have skyrocketed. A Los Angeles Times survey late last year put the average budget of a drama pilot at more than $6 million.

"The networks have come to realize these shows have to be more visually sophisticated, more arresting," says David Semel, a producer-director on such shows as "American Dreams" and "Heroes."

"A pilot like the one for `Heroes' never would have been made some years ago. It's a feature film on television."

But the high costs simply contribute to the frantic nature of the process at this point.

"It's like pro sports. There are people you want on your team, and that group is finite," says Carlton Cruise, executive producer of "Lost."

"Everybody's chasing the same actors and the same writers, and it's all on this clock. I don't think that's necessarily the best way to nurture something creatively."

Jon Amiel, who began his directing career in Britain on such shows as "The Singing Detective," says, "The world of American television was something of a brutal shock to me when I first discovered the insanity of pilot season. It's like an entire Japanese fishing fleet lighting into the same shore of mackerel. It's a spectacularly senseless process."

The feeding frenzy is particularly pronounced when it comes to directors and such top drama guns as Semel and David Nutter ("The X-Files"), who often will get multiple offers. The go-to guy on comedy is veteran James Burrows, whose credentials go all the way back to "The Mary Tyler Moore Show." This year, Burrows will do at least a half dozen sitcom pilots.

Actors not at best

For actors, "it stinks. It's a very difficult and long process for everyone," says Teri Polo, whose credits include "The West Wing."

"As an actor, you go on two or three different auditions a day for a different pilot. It's rolling the dice if you get a call back, if you even get seen, if you get to test."

Sean Maguire, a co-star of "The Class," says, "You go in and you want to be fresh and alert, and it's nearly impossible." Doing three auditions a day can be "soul-destroying," he says, "because you end up doing a crappy job on all three."

If you get multiple offers, says Paget Brewster, now on "Criminal Minds" and someone who has done 16 pilots during her career, the pressure is to make the right choice. "There have been times in the process where I've had to flip a coin to decide what to do."

Eventually, however, the pilots do get made and get into the hands of network executives who then have to weigh all kinds of factors in their decisions, ranging from what they think they need for their lineups to the reactions of focus groups to what their own guts tell them about a show's potential to be a hit.

"The objective is to create buzz and to do projects that have the potential of being breakout hits," says CBS's Tassler. "In order to achieve that goal, you still have to have all the elements of great storytelling: drama, direction, acting. Buzz is not an isolated objective."

Which may explain why this pilot season is riddled with high-concept shows that could cut through the clutter the way "Heroes" did last fall. Thanks to the success of "The Office," there are British imports, including such quirky offerings as American versions of the musical-comedy/film noir "Viva Blackpool!" and the lusty Brit soap "Footballers Wives." There are shows involving 1970s wife-swapping ("Swingtown"), exorcism ("Demons"), 400-year-old detectives ("New Amsterdam") and time travelers ("Journeyman").

And what will make the cut?

We won't know for sure until mid-May, when the networks present their schedules to advertisers in New York. The only thing that's certain is that within a few weeks, everyone will start revving up for the next pilot season. And the process will start all over again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 2
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
    • Andrew sure has hard nips.
    • I was watching some August 1987 episodes and they brought back so many memories. I had some thoughts: Lisa and Jamie were so dull. Lisa was such a nothing character. It boggles my mind that so much story was centered around her in such a short amount of time. Joanna Going is a talented actress, but the material was just not there.  It was so good to see Wallingford and Mitch again. I know there was talk about Felicia a while back, but these episodes reminded me how integral Felicia was for the show.  Sally Spencer was done so dirty. She is turning in superb performances in an icky storyline. I wish she had stuck around longer. She has chemistry with everyone. The McKinnons should have lasted longer. Spencer had some strong stuff with Stephen Schnetzer and Mary Alexander. AW waster such a talented actress by getting rid of her. Justice for Cheryl too. I also missed Ed Fry when he left. Sandra Ferguson was a star from the moment she came on. She was charismatic and just popped. She had immediate chemistry with RKK and blended in well with Wyndham and Watson. I'd forgotten about the teenage Matthew.  I have no memory of Peggy Lazarus. She must not have lasted long. Was the original plan for John that he was going to turn out to be the twins' real father?      
    • If the new and improved copies that @rsclassicfanforever has uploaded can be manually moved into the "by month, by year" folders, that would be awesome. I personally don't think it's necessary to keep the older versions (which either have Dutch subtitles hard coded on them, or are lesser in picture quality). That's a lot of valuable drive space that could be cleared. Just my view but can appreciate others may feel differently. The structure had been by month by year previously, so I think it would be easier to conform to that, where so much prior work to get it to that format has already been done. Hopefully you can "drag and drop" so the new copies are in the right month/year? Re Clips, I never look at them now we pretty much have the episodes in full. Appreciate others may use, however. Thanks for all your hard work here @BoldRestless!
    • Oh yes defintely, Josh Griffith repeats and repeats the same storylines.
    • Isnt’t this storyline similar to the Cameron Kirsten situation though? Sharon thought she killed him. He ended up being alive and Sharon was being tormented with thinking she was seeing his face everywhere and that’s how we got that iconic scene with her and Nikki in the sewers.   I understand in Mariah’s case this is different circumstances but it does seem like a play on that whole thing. Maybe I’m wrong. I just wish if they were going to make any character follow in Sharon’s foot steps it would be Faith. Mariah wasn’t even raised by her, and her personality is different. I would expect her to take a different path. I understand I could be completely jumping ahead because the storyline hasn’t even played out yet but we’ll see. 
    • Thanks again @Paul Raven Monica was completely without redeeming qualities at this point. I always found the whole Monica = Carly narrative regressive, as I don't think shows comparing characters so heavily is ever a great idea, but she's actually worse than Carly was. Was it the Pollocks who had Leslie have a miscarriage?  Giving her a child, especially by rape, was not a good idea, but a part of me wishes they'd committed to it just to see what story it might have had in later years.
    • @janea4old Your detailed explanation and delving into the psychology and motivations is no doubt the opposite of what we will see onscreeen. As @ranger1rg stated we will get a few scenes and some sketchy explanations. Like the adoption of Aria, most of it will take place off screen.
    • I'm suddenly fearful that DAYS is going to pull a Flowers-for-Algernon stunt and Bo's progress will be reversed.  While @te. is stuck on Abe's tiny bedroom, I can't stop thinking of the size of Bo's huge hospital room.
    • Okay, why are Paulina and Abe sleeping like that?!  I'd take a screen grab if I wasn't lazy, but come on.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy