Jump to content

All: TIME: "Sex an Suffering in the Afternoon"


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I'm one of the millions who grew up watching soaps with grandparents, so for me, no matter what era it was (and I grew up in the 1990s, mind you), soaps to me always meant drinking coffee with grandma at the kitchen table, watching "The Price is Right" and "The Young and the Restless," then helping her do chores around the house while the news was on in the background, then retreating to the living room for B&B, ATWT, and GL, before my mother came to pick me up. In essence, I feel like I grew up in that 1970s soap environment, but in the 1990s. Grandma actually told me stories about the characters on the show who had been around since the early days (ATWT was her favorite, so it was always a goldmine of memories for her, which she always shared with me).

Anyway, I absolutely love this article. I've read it many, many times since TIME posted it on their site a few years back, and I'll keep reading it every now and then. It's really a good, fun article. I still stand by my opinion that soaps began to really hit the bricks when they all expanded like crazy. I just can't imagine anything beating the game shows in the morning/soap operas in the afternoon formula. It. Just. Worked! Even now, most of the syndicated game shows in my area air on the major networks in timeslots that were traditionally for network game shows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 39
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Do you have a scan of the article. I am sure it must have some pretty rare historic photos as well. Gosh, Susan Hayes looks so hot on that cover.

That is what Sarah Bibel asserted in her blog, and she is so right. The guilty pleasures of the afternoon are now in the evening.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah I got it from Amazon.marketplace for cheap. it's not as essential as, say, Schemering's indispensible Soap Encyclopedia but it is one of my better soap boosk--great pictures and an interesting collection of essays from different sources on many subjects about soaps

I wanna see those soap ratings from the article...

And yeah it's pretty true that primetime now offers more and more things you used to only be able to find in daytime--I mean even the majority of popular sitcoms took up SOME soap opera elements (Friends' Rachel/Ross romance, etc)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm going to look for the actual magazine this summer. If I find it I will scan it, including the "tear drops" instead of "stars" ratings for each soap. My Grandmother is long dead now but most of her old TIME and LIFE magazines, along with some really interresting "Crime Does Not Pay" comics from the 40's and 50's, and old PHOTOPLAYs are stored in the cottage attic. Wish me luck. I know this issue was well read and might have disappeared.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Sorry to bump, but I just want to thank EricMontreal22!

I knew about the Worlds Without End exhibit, and really wanted to go....but was not able to at that point in my life. I never knew a book resulted...

I'm now the proud owner of the book ($1.99, used, via Amazon). The Thurber article looks GREAT. And the pictures....swoon!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

IMO, the problem with the hour-long soap is that there are very few headwriters who can successfully do them, and this isn't just a recent thing. I think it would be a great idea for the return of the half-hour soap, but it'll never happen. It is cheaper and more cost effective for the networks/production companies to produce an hour show than 30 minutes...in fact, that was the main reason for the initial expansions.

When the soaps first were expanded back in the mid to late 70's, they were in the hands of highly talented and creative artists such as Harding Lemay, Agnes Nixon, Bill Bell, Pat Falken Smith, and Bridget and Jerome Dobson. They were able to take the hour and not just stuff it with filler...the extra time was used to flesh out the characters and the drama, to expand upon the themes of the individual programs. This was during a period when each individual show was unique with both stated and underlying themes, and they were actually 'about' something' other than stunts.

These days, the current versions of the soaps are mere carbon copies of each other, with interchangable storylines and/or characters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Bridget and Jerome Dobson. :::hyperventilates::: Could we ever get them to come back to Daytime?

That Time cover is the sh!tniz. Susan Seaforth Hayes' red dress reminds me of a gown I once saw a stunning professional tango dancer wear. And the look in her face -- twixt suffering and ecstacy!

I'm glad they mentioned Love of Life in the article. I've only seen fragments of an episode from the mid-70s and read old SOD synopses but both make me want to see so much more. Tudi Wiggins was the bomb as scheming Meg... with Cal her emotionally fragile daughter. It sounds so old-fashioned now when we see the Wimmin of Daytime all supposedly Kicking Ass and Taking Names Later, :rolleyes: but soaps really were about sex and suffering in equal measure back then. They seemed to represent the uncertainty and unfairness of life, all wrapped up in one seductive package.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Unfortunately I only had one or two pages from those months. I believe I posted them but it would only cover one or two shows. 
    • I think she would have been fine, although Beth was a thankless part. She probably was seen as aging out of the genre after AW.  I forgot she was on Sunset Beach. 
    • Nicole's lucky Im no a soap villian bc if I was Wig, Id replace the liquid in her Febreze bottle with an odorless poison so that everytime she sprayed that thing, she'd be slowly killing herself

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • OK, I like the Cat interactions with Xander and EJ. And, I get that there are new writers. But, Clyde was shot 12/11/2024.  So, why have we not heard Xander or EJ's response to the situation for five months!  Clyde shot EJ (or he ordered him shot), shouldn't he react more to the news of his coma.  And, I've never heard EJ or Kristin mention that the woman who lived with them last summer was a fraud. Rather than giving lip service to the idea of family and community, at least it feels like everyone no longer lives in a bubble.
    • I don't know if I could have seen that from her, honestly. But I feel like, outside of GH and her original DAYS stint, American daytime really didn't pay much attention to her, even though they should have.
    • Co-sign, 100% on this one. Xander was entirely in the wrong.
    • I'm seeing some interesting takes on this thread regarding Dani's behavior/personality, including right now. Here's my take on her: I think that Dani relishes in lighting people up. I think that's for multiple reasons.  I feel like Dani has probably largely been like this throughout her life. And that she gets joy in dragging people whenever she feels like it's necessary. I believe she feels like this is her being herself. I think one big reason why she's particularly giddy right now is because she's able to go back to acting this way, minus the hurt she's been dealing with due to Bill's affair. She got in Bill and Hayley's faces after their affair/wedding, but she was miserable doing it due to dealing with the hurt of that situation. Nicole's situation with Ted/Eva/Leslie allows her to act this way minus her suffering like she did at the hands of Bill. I believe she does empathize/care for her sister but is also interestingly enough rejuvenated by this situation. This situation is energizing her and making her act more like old self again, minus being hurt by her own's husband's infidelity. I think Nicole's situation is also a distraction for her from dealing with her own failed marriage to Bill.  
    • Great episode, better than what the spoilers said. The gambling story was tolerable but Jon Lindstrom sucks in the role. Ambyr Michelle continues to shine. The diner and country club scenes were very well executed.  The Jan and Leslie scenes were very good! My favorite is Eva, now followed by Nicole.
    • Today's show was good. The only part I didn't care for were the Derek/Ashley scenes. I think they are bland together and Derek is very bland by himself. He is the least interesting character on the show IMO. I don't think they have much chemistry together. I appreciated Jan's reaction to Leslie. I like how regular/realistic her and Mona are as characters. Jan came across as very believable of being appalled and even hurt by Leslie's treatment of them and towards Eva in the diner.  Leslie continues to try and manipulate people with IMO her fake caring routine, only to show her true colors after she's confronted/called out for her treatment of others. I continue to dislike the way she mistreats Eva. Speaking of Eva she was great again today. I love her and I like how Martin comforted her in the diner. I liked that Vernon showed concern for her as well. They (especially Martin) will come around quicker to her before others (like the Dupree women) will. I also am glad to see her and Ted continue to bond and him behaving like a father towards her/helping her. He's the only one in her life who is fully trying to stand by her. I look forward to seeing their relationship grow.
    • Xander was screaming at Felicity.  He did do something wrong.  Felicity was clearly upset by it and Cat/Chad told him to stop.  That's fair.  No one deserves to be yelled at their job-and even I think this plot point is too preachy.  It's not acceptable behavior for anyone to do that.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy