Jump to content

SoapNet: More Disturbing News From The Internet


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Found this posted at: http://disc.server.com/discussion.cgi?disc...R%3E%20%3CBR%3E

The lady did not post the original source. But this fits in with what Frons was saying in his interview. This is ridiculous. Shows like Jerry Springer, Love Boat, etc. have other places to be shown. This is stupid.

I do love the sounds of Dark Shadows & Peyton Place, but I hate we are losing Another World for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 12
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

This has good aspects and bad aspects.

I would love to see reruns of the golden age of "The Jerry Springer Show" (the late 90s), but that DOES NOT belong a network celebrating passion and romance. Are they [!@#$%^&*] insane?

On the other hand, "Dark Shadows" and "Peyton Place" are shows that deserve to be on television. Same with "The Love Boat," which was similar to the former SOAPnet show "Hotel" anyway.

Why do these channels feel the need to change formats?! Why can't their owners just cough up the cash to make a whole new network? Now that I think about that, I do remember the constant rumors of SOAPnet creating a second channel. Could this simply be in preparations for that?

Or this could all be a bunch of made up crap...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

What I don't get is if you want Passions and Drama, why get rid of AW? Um it has tons of Passion and Drama. There's Ryan and Vicky, the Frankie/Cass/Kathleen triangle, and the stuff with Paulina and Jake that's coming up and so and so on. That is why this sounds like crap. This sounds like someone who wants to see those shows back on TV made up and wants to get SN watchers further riled up than they already are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes I agree this must be false. For one, if they are getting rid of RH and AW, I highly doubt they would get two soaps that are even older. I don't expect them to be adding any more classic soaps are this rate. I expect in a few years we'll be getting Ugly Betty, Brothers and Sisters, Gilmore Girls, Felicity, etc.

Plus PDN sounds like that religious channel CBN and certainly doesn't have a ring to it. It would just cheapen the brand, but really with Frons nothing surprises me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I can't see Ugly Betty and Brothers and Sisters on Soapnet. They will go to Lifetime to be with GA and DH. Gilmore Girls seems quite comfortable on ABC family.

ETA: In fact, I bet we hear sometime towards the end of the year that UB and B&S will start airing on Lifetime. It was halfway through DH and GA's second seasons that it was announced that their off network rights went to Lifetime.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well it will definitely be between SOAPnet and Lifetime for the repeats. They would've had Desperate Housewives and Grey's Anatomy if they had the money. I don't think UB and B&S will cost as much because they had less viewers. SOAPnet will have more of a shot.

But whatever recent soap it is, thats what we can expect, not daytime classics. But it all depends on how The OC/OTH do. Lets keep our fingers crossed it flops and viewers get sick of watching the same cycle of episodes every four months, multiple times a day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

UB and B&S may have less viewers but with their casts and who runs them, I can't see them agreeing to air their re-runs on Soapnet. I know that Soapnet is running a B&S recap show next weekend but them airing re-runs of a show that stars Sally Field and Callista Flockhart? I don't think so. Not to mention Lifetime reaches way more homes. It has been part of basic cable for years and years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes and SOAPnet has been growing every year. They also mentioned having great ratings for the few episodes of Ugly Betty they have aired. They may not get the shows in the end, but I can assure you that they will absolutely be a frontrunner when it comes to picking these shows up.

Soaps don't syndicate well so it's only going to be between Lifetime, Oxygen and SOAPnet for all of these soapy new shows. And if The OC/OTH is a success them SOAPnet will continue growing and growing and this is clearly the direction they want to go i n.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

If SoapNet is still in the digital only tier those shows will want a station that has more chance of an audience (and would pay a lot more.) I'd suspect ABC Family may be an option as would TNT, USA and a few others.

Now whether or not they'd get the money they would like is another matter. Audiences are going down across the board. The industry is suffering. I think things will be changing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I had forgotten that several Days stars came out strong against Melissa. Good for them!
    • That would have made sense. Did all these characters get dropped when DePriest left or had they already been dropped?
    • The other issue with Missy: in June 2020, she "liked" some social media posts by Candace Owens -- things Candace said that were against Black Lives Matter.  That is described here https://tvline.com/news/melissa-reeves-racism-days-of-our-lives-instagram-controversy-2894568/ I don't know if that was ever resolved.
    • She appeared onscreen not long after Rose Livingston and Sara Montaigne, and we found out that Sara was Rose's estranged daughter. I wonder whether Peggy might have been part of that family group -- or else they were just juggling a few different potential mysteries so that they could develop whatever seemed to be getting the best response from the audience. They didn't do anything much with Rose and Sara really either. Maybe Rose would have become more prominent if Rachel and Mac had split up over Mitch, or if Sara had really flourished. In some ways I can picture Cheryl being affected by MJ's prostitution similarly to how Josie was distressed by finding out about Sharlene. But I can also see that Josie as a Frame being involved with Matthew would have different stakes for Rachel and Sharlene than Cheryl being involved with Scott. I do think the solution for Cheryl would have had to be a badder boy than Scott -- either a real bad boy who would do her wrong, or the kind of bad boy (not Chad!!!) who is essentially misunderstood and other people just don't understand. Cheryl would also have been better off with some friends her own age. Matthew and Josie benefited a bit from having other teenagers to interact with.
    • Sally Spencer was a decent actress, but the writing destroyed the "M.J." that Kathleen Layman had built. Layman had a quiet strength about her, and she and Osburn really felt like sisters. Spencer's character should have been either an unmentioned sister, or maybe Jake's that grew up close to Kathleen, M.J. and the rest, but was away for a few years before joining the force. Kristen Marie was o.k., but I always got a mousier vibe from her. Being pigeon-holed with Scott for most of the run hurt things for her, as well.  The Loves were also underserved between Rhonda Lewin and Philece Sampler. Philece would have been better as Nicole. Thank goodness Anne Heche  showed up for the next round of auditions. Christopher Holder was mediocre as Peter, but given a shot, I think Marcus Smythe could have stuck around for a while.  I would have had Peggy Lazarus be a Frame -- possibly an ex-wife for Vince with an agenda. Smythe and Hollen had  a fun chemistry that could have kept the two around.. Bringing recasts for  Cheryl and Ben back mixing it up with other Frames. Corys, Lawrences at the time might have kept all the families stronger. 
    • shoot...he said in that Locher room with Krista. I think he met her before that---she was doing Broadway and they had mutual friends or an agent maybe?
    • Yes. And I assume he met Mary Ellen Stuart at GL.
    • That's an odd coincidence. Yeah, Roger would turn anything he could to his advantage. At the time, he's just taking the pictures to bank leverage over Reva, Billy or the Lewises.  I'm kinda squeamish about 1986 episodes myself. I'd love to hear the original version of Ross/Vanessa/Dinah, but the Cain story is bad, and I don't want Billy and Vanessa to break up.
    • Eeek. I didn't know this either! I will say, though, even though they skimmed over a lot of Roger's past, I will give them props for not trying to turn him into a hero. Yeah, I was hoping we would get more 1986 episodes than were available on YT before, but now I'm wondering if I really want to see that. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy