Jump to content

ATWT: Interview with Marnie Schulenburg


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Link Fixed

Okay....in response to the fact that she hasn't watched ANY tapes of Alison because TPTB wanted her "to make the role her own" is just ridiculous! THIS is why all the recasts seem like new characters. The first step in understanding Alison is seeing how someone else before you portrayed that particular person for three or more years!!

And then she says that she thinks Alison has matured alot more. HA! When Jessica Dunphy left, Alison was helping friend Katie, helping out at Metro, and then moved off to stand by her boyfriend's side as he grieved for his dying, bed-ridden mother. And now, they're having her return in the same immature phase she was in when Jessica Dunphy first started off in the role. So how is that MATURED?!??!!

Also find it utterly ridiculous how she says in the beginning of the interview that one of the deciding factors in her getting a screen test was because "They mentioned that they were bringing back this character, Alison, who had been on the show two years ago and that I looked like her, so we ended up moving on to a screen test."

Idiots!! From now on, when referring to ATWT, I'm going to start saying TIIC instead of TPTB. :rolleyes: RIDICULOUS!!

Heck, this girl hasn't even graced my TV screen yet and I'm already wanting her to go away!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I can't hold what TAIC told her about not watching tapes, her character, etc. One, as nice as Jessie Dunphy was, she drove me nuts in the role half the time. So, I actually prefer that nuAli not be influenced by JD's portrayal. I'd hate to have nuAli leap around spontaneously hugging people like an overanxious puppy.

Two, you can't judge her on the five AliSlut minutes on Y&R. I watched the first two LA Dairies things, and I think the girl can act.

Three, what she meant by "mature" is "gained some hard life experience." It happens in your twenties, even if you've already been in jail for a month, lost a child and been dumped at the altar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I should make my previous post more clear. When I said she was terrible, I was thinking more of the character of Alison. She's yet another weak, demeaned woman on a show that is all about demeaning women. I also don't think the actress has the depth to make her interesting enough for me to care.

Even if she were real!Alison, do we really need her at this moment? The teen scene needs a break, if anything Luke needs a love interest and thats it. What they need to do is bring back more older characters. The show is 100% centered around the teens and the adults need to be fleshed out. Teens can only bring you so many viewers, by alienating your core audience your ratings go to the toilet, which is why ATWT is doing so bad now.

I almost fainted when Meg mentioned that Emma was with Iva. Why can't they bring back some of those characters to flesh out the older peeps stories? Ellie could come back and mix things up with Craig and Dusty as well. They could mention the fact that Craig has slept with Iva, Ellie AND now Meg (not to mention Lucinda).

Sierra is another character that is actually needed as is John Dixon, Chris Hughes and Andy Dixon. I'd also settle for the simple respect for my years of loyalty by bringing back old characters just for holidays. Imagine how great it would be if Iva or Ellie or Seth brought Emma back and decided to visit family? Just one or two days is all I ask. Some proof that they know the show existed before 2000.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • She appeared onscreen not long after Rose Livingston and Sara Montaigne, and we found out that Sara was Rose's estranged daughter. I wonder whether Peggy might have been part of that family group -- or else they were just juggling a few different potential mysteries so that they could develop whatever seemed to be getting the best response from the audience. They didn't do anything much with Rose and Sara really either. Maybe Rose would have become more prominent if Rachel and Mac had split up over Mitch, or if Sara had really flourished. In some ways I can picture Cheryl being affected by MJ's prostitution similarly to how Josie was distressed by finding out about Sharlene. But I can also see that Josie as a Frame being involved with Matthew would have different stakes for Rachel and Sharlene than Cheryl being involved with Scott. I do think the solution for Cheryl would have had to be a badder boy than Scott -- either a real bad boy who would do her wrong, or the kind of bad boy (not Chad!!!) who is essentially misunderstood and other people just don't understand. Cheryl would also have been better off with some friends her own age. Matthew and Josie benefited a bit from having other teenagers to interact with.
    • Sally Spencer was a decent actress, but the writing destroyed the "M.J." that Kathleen Layman had built. Layman had a quiet strength about her, and she and Osburn really felt like sisters. Spencer's character should have been either an unmentioned sister, or maybe Jake's that grew up close to Kathleen, M.J. and the rest, but was away for a few years before joining the force. Kristen Marie was o.k., but I always got a mousier vibe from her. Being pigeon-holed with Scott for most of the run hurt things for her, as well.  The Loves were also underserved between Rhonda Lewin and Philece Sampler. Philece would have been better as Nicole. Thank goodness Anne Heche  showed up for the next round of auditions. Christopher Holder was mediocre as Peter, but given a shot, I think Marcus Smythe could have stuck around for a while.  I would have had Peggy Lazarus be a Frame -- possibly an ex-wife for Vince with an agenda. Smythe and Hollen had  a fun chemistry that could have kept the two around.. Bringing recasts for  Cheryl and Ben back mixing it up with other Frames. Corys, Lawrences at the time might have kept all the families stronger. 
    • shoot...he said in that Locher room with Krista. I think he met her before that---she was doing Broadway and they had mutual friends or an agent maybe?
    • Yes. And I assume he met Mary Ellen Stuart at GL.
    • That's an odd coincidence. Yeah, Roger would turn anything he could to his advantage. At the time, he's just taking the pictures to bank leverage over Reva, Billy or the Lewises.  I'm kinda squeamish about 1986 episodes myself. I'd love to hear the original version of Ross/Vanessa/Dinah, but the Cain story is bad, and I don't want Billy and Vanessa to break up.
    • Eeek. I didn't know this either! I will say, though, even though they skimmed over a lot of Roger's past, I will give them props for not trying to turn him into a hero. Yeah, I was hoping we would get more 1986 episodes than were available on YT before, but now I'm wondering if I really want to see that. 
    • That's what Julie Hanan Carruthers is doing for BTG at the new studio in Atlanta, but JHC is credited. And @errol said JHC is working in a nonproduction capacity at Y&R.
    • I remember when the whole Missy Reeves controversy started in 2012.  She tweeted support of a business that had made homophobic statements. Greg Rikaart (who was on Y&R back then) publicly called her out on it, but was willing to reach out and speak with her. Article here: https://greginhollywood.com/greg-rikaart-talks-about-his-twitter-war-with-fellow-soap-star-melissa-reeves-over-anti-gay-chick-fil-a-73139 That being said, ten years later, on DAYS, in 2022, when they had they double wedding of Leo/CraigWesley and Gwen/Xander, Jack and Jennifer came to the wedding.  At that time, Missy Reeves was only intermittently available for DAYS. Jennifer was living "in Boston" and Cady McClain and Missy were each intermittently appearing as Jennifer, on the specific occasions when the show required a Jennifer to appear. Missy wasn't on contract and she could have said no. But she chose to appear as Jennifer for the gay wedding of Greg Rikaart's character.   So... I mean... I would assume they reached a détente behind-the-scenes. Missy still has her belief system but there's that.
    • That was one of the best grandslam finals.  Alcaraz comes all the way back down 2 sets to 0, and three match points in the 3rd set, to win it in a 5th set tie-break.  And the quality of play was excellent - so many great shots.  What a battle!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy