Jump to content

January 29 - February 2, 2007


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I don't know. It is hard to say how much they affect the soaps. I know that the research said that Grey's Anatomy rose 5% in that desired age group the first episode they counted it.

And you look at Days in that specific age group (18-34) they rose .3 back to number one. That is a pretty hefty rise in HH's in any category in this day of ratings.

And in HH's all that matter is that particular TV is tuned in. The students could be coming and going but the show still gets the HH rating for that particular set.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Wow, GH tied B&B. :o But not surprised. I havent seen B&B lately. Surprised by ATWT drop thought it was better last week. And I see Wednesday and Thursday shows the best of the week were the highest. I also not suprised by the jump in Thursday's episode of GL. It was a very good show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It needs to wake up Jean Passanante and Chris Goutman. GL could overtake ATWT in total viewers and HH's next week. It was serve JP after the crap she has given us lately. Maybe then she will get the boot!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

MONDAY, JANUARY 29, 2007

1.(1) Y&R: Monday: 4.3/5,707,000

2.(2) B&B: Monday: 2.9/4,034,000

3.(5) DAYS: Monday: 2.8/3,810,000

4.(4) GH: Monday: 2.8/3,655,000

5.(7) AMC: Monday: 2.7/3,445,000

6.(8) OLTL: Monday: 2.6/3,341,000

7.(6) ATWT: Monday: 2.3/3,285,000

8.(3) GL: Monday: 2.2/2,982,000

9.(9) PSNS: Monday: 1.8/2,306,000

TUESDAY, JANUARY 30, 2007

1.(1) Y&R: Tuesday: 4.3/5,625,000

2.(2) B&B: Tuesday: 2.9/3,753,000

3.(4) GH: Tuesday: 2.9/3,698,000

4.(3) DAYS: Tuesday: 2.6/3,328,000

5.(5) AMC: Tuesday: 2.6/3,234,000

6.(6) OLTL: Tuesday: 2.6/3,193,000

7.(7) ATWT: Tuesday: 2.2/2,880,000

8.(8) GL: Tuesday: 2.2/2,877,000

9.(9) PSNS: Tuesday: 1.6/1,883,000

WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 31, 2007

1.(1) Y&R: Wednesday: 4.3/5,879,000

2.(2) B&B: Wednesday: 3.1/4,105,000

3.(3) GH: Wednesday: 2.9/3,856,000

4.(7) ATWT: Wednesday: 2.5/3,415,000

5.(4) DAYS: Wednesday: 2.6/3,383,000

6.(5) AMC: Wednesday: 2.7/3,382,000

7.(6) OLTL: Wednesday: 2.6/3,339,000

8.(8) GL: Wednesday: 2.4/3,245,000

9.(9) PSNS: Wednesday: 1.7/2,259,000

THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 1, 2007

1.(1) Y&R: Thursday: 4.4/5,659,000

2.(3) GH: Thursday: 3.1/4,098,000

3.(2) B&B: Thursday: 3.2/3,994,000

4.(7) OLTL: Thursday: 2.7/3,521,000

5.(6) AMC: Thursday: 2.8/3,503,000

6.(5) DAYS: Thursday: 2.7/3,448,000

7.(8) GL: Thursday: 2.6/3,396,000

8.(4) ATWT: Thursday: 2.5/3,220,000

9.(9) PSNS: Thursday: 1.6/2,075,000

FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 2, 2007

1.(1) Y&R: Friday: 4.2/5,634,000

2.(3) B&B: Friday: 3.0/4,069,000

3.(2) GH: Friday: 3.1/4,005,000

4.(4) OLTL: Friday: 2.5/3,338,000

5.(5) AMC: Friday: 2.5/3,092,000

6.(8) ATWT: Friday: 2.3/2,981,000

7.(7) GL: Friday: 2.2/2,966,000

8.(6) DAYS: Friday: 2.4/2,927,000

9.(9) PSNS: Friday: 1.5/1,779,000

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm not surprised B&B is now tied with GH: Bradley Bell is killing B&B. There's nothing on that soap interesting me right now, and the imminent Phoebe/Rick SL will turn off even more viewers. :rolleyes::rolleyes:

If DAYS bring back Matt Ashford(Jack) in a big way, if only on a short term basis, and hype this to the max, that should help the ratings. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm so glad that GH is catching up to B&B. Bell has ruined BB with his crappy storytelling, writing, and constantly shuffling of couples. Bridge is the worst thing that's happened and now another incestuous relationship with Rick and Phoebe. Bell hasn't has an original idea in 5 years. I was hoping Day would be the show to pass B&B, but hopefully this will be a wakeup call to Bell, to stop insulting the intelligence of his fans with crappy stories and re writes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

:o I had to make sure I read right when I saw that GL got a 2.6 on Thursday. It even beat ATWT that day. When was the last time that happened??? :blink:

Wednesday's show should have been a lot higher...I thought it was better than Thursday.

Check out that huge drop come Friday..and still, it manages to beat Days in total viewers. I'm glad the show didn't sink any lower. Right now, it looks safe and with the writing being the best it's even been in a while, there shouldn't be anymore big drops.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • These contract guarantees of 1 ep per month are ridiculous. How can you even have a story if your character apprars 4-5 times in a month? It's sad.
    • It's hard to tell with some actors appearing on average 4 times in a month whether they're recurring or just on a low guarantee contract. Someone recurring  like Beth Maitland can be used a lot for several months then disappear. So the monthly tallies aren't enough to go by.
    • Of the so-called "contract" cast members, I'd venture to say these are recurring: Bryton James, Camryn Grimes, and (possibly) Michael Graziadei.  I've suspected since 2018 that Kate Linder and Christian LeBlanc are recurring.  And I believe we all know Miss Ordway is, because she said so. lol.  
    • Dante blaming Gio instead of his dweeb son and the other dweeb was just ridiculous. Gio's paternity story is going in circles with no reveal. I've already started fast forwarding Drew and his stupid ho Willow's story. Kristina's story is beyond dumb with no great payoff.
    • Sarah (with the English accent) isn't just some random character.  Sarah was once the housekeeper for Eliot Dorn and Margo Huntington.  One of the following 2 scenarios happened a few months ago: (1):  One night, while Margo wasn't at home, and while Oscar the Doorman wasn't at his post, a burglar sneaked into the private elevator, rode up to the penthouse, stole several thousand dollars worth of Margo's valuable diamonds and pearls, and tied-up Eliot Dorn and Sarah the Housekeeper, ensuring that Eliot and Sarah couldn't pursue the burglar back down to the lobby or phone the police to apprehend the burglar. OR --  (2): Eliot Dorn was SLEEPING with Sarah the Housekeeper, and the two of them conspired to steal Margo's jewelry and went on a lavish spending spree and then tied THEMSELVES up to make it look as though a burglary had occurred in the penthouse. Margo Dorn currently believes Scenario #1 occurred, and she's rather annoyed that the "incompetent police" haven't located her stolen jewels yet.  Eliot and Sarah know that Scenario #2 actually occurred.  When Sarah stopped by the Unicorn and saw Eliot kissing Raven Swift, Sarah snidely said, "Oh! This must be Mrs. Dorn!  Nice to meet you, Mrs. Dorn!" Sarah knew good & damn well Raven isn't "Mrs. Dorn" because Sarah worked for Margo Dorn on a daily basis for many months.  That was Sarah's not-so-subtle way of announcing, "I'll be paying a visit to District Attorney Logan Swift and letting him know that his wife is sleeping with you, and I'll be paying a visit to WMON to let Margo Huntington know that you're sleeping with Mrs. Swift!"  lol.     
    • The AMC hate came from Jamey Giddens/DC and their industry friends, IMO. For whatever reason I always felt they targeted the show, and it was wrong. AMC ratings were decent and even went up under Pratt (Yet, he was fired). The ratings were also good under Broderick and lowered out after her interim.  There was no reason to be upset with the show other than it being slow. They literally played it safe and did the best they could in 2010 and 2011. 
    • I have very detailed synopses of all 1976 storylines for the soaps from the Daytime Serial Newsletter. Please let me know if you are interested in a particular show and I will post it in the appropriate thread. As I stated they are very detailed, so I don't want to clutter up threads if posters are not interested.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Surely we (and Billy Flynn) are not going to be saddled with a character named Aristotle Dumas? This isn't 1970's Edge of Night.
    • What annoys me a little bit about the "day players" is they sound a bit too "Brooklyn-ish" sometimes.  Obviously, the show was taped in New York City, and the actors are all New York actors, but Monticello is supposed to be located in Illinois or Ohio.  Occasionally, they grab actors and actresses for small roles who have VERY distinct New York accents, which contrasts sharply with the main cast, none of whom have noticeable accents (except for our dashing European gigolo, Eliot Dorn, of course).  The heavy Brooklyn accent works fine if the character is a bookie, or the owner of a pawn shop, or a guy who's selling stolen guns on the street corner.  But when it's a steadily recurring character -- such as the first Mrs. Goodman, who worked for Miles and Nicole -- it's pretty jarring to me sometimes.  And you'll see it often -- such as an "under-five" character who witnesses a car accident, or a character who witnesses a shooting, or the occasional desk clerk, or waiter.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy