Jump to content

Y&R: Hack Marie Latham forgot Doug Marland's 6th rule


Recommended Posts

  • Members

This is absolutely my problem with her regime, it's turned Y&R into Just Another Soap. I don't mean to say Y&R was Shakespeare before or Arthur Miller or Citizen Kane, it was just head and shoulders above the rest, now it's fairly middle of the pact. Maybe a little bit better but not by much. The mediocrity of the other soaps (even though they can have flashes of brilliance, such as GL this past week and a half) is what drove me to Y&R in the first place.

Soaps used to have a singular vision and voice and creators who knew their characters intimately. That's not the case anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 32
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Yup. It's sad. And that's part of the reason for these rules being broken so often. Decisions are made by fifty people now, rather than one. A headwriter might have great story intentions, but for one ridiculous executive decision or another, the idea is nixed. Either that, or their original story vision is modified until it looks nothing like the original idea. Only a select few in daytime are really given free reign, and unfortunately for us, those few aren't worth a pile of sh!t.

When headwriters are given the chance to plow full steam ahead with their sole vision, greatness can occur. That rarely happens in today's world. Because of that, we can't really blame only the headwriters. There's a whole group of people who deserve to have eggs thrown at their heads.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh I agree, but the show has been changing ever since Bell stepped down and then passed away. I for one quit watching under Alden & Smith. I couldn't stand what they did to the show. At least under Latham I do find the show watchable. She pulled me back in when John was found guilty of murder and then I stayed. I couldn't stand to watch much under Alden and under Smith I couldn't watch at all.

No one will ever be as good as Bell. Those days are over - unfortunately. And who knows even if Bell was still around - who knows that some of the things wouldn't have changed.

As others have pointed out it was a committee that didn't even include Latham that made a lot of the obvious choices like the shots of flowers and all. And one of those was Bell's own son. I mean that was published that he and his committee were the ones that made those changes, and they had nothing to do with Latham. Alot of those changes made by Bell and Bloom are the main things that don't make Y&R seem set apart anymore. It makes it appear just like the other soaps, but Latham had nothing to do with those.

I don't agree with everything Latham has done. But one thing that I have learned in the last year with all my shows - and believe me it was a hard lesson to learn. You can't compare your show to the way it used to be. If you do you will not be able to enjoy it anymore. That happened to me last year with so many of my shows.

You critique them and decide from that if you like what is happening and either move on or don't, but there are so many factors that influence what the shows are able to do today. As Kenny pointed out there is more things controlled by committee. Today the heads of daytime seem more involved than I ever remember them being. And of course budgets are not what they were.

Y&R fans are just now facing what many of us have had to face for a long time.

With that you may still find you don't like Y&R. I realized that and there are still things I don't like about my 2 absolute favorite shows Days and AMC, but I am able to watch them some now and enjoy them. Neither are going to be as good as they once were. I know many say Hogan has brought back the old Days but IMO he hasn't. His Days is still a pale version of the Days I have loved in the past - some of that has to do with him but others I am sure is Corday and Wyman. But it is better than it was. And to me Y&R is world's better than it was under Smith, and still heads above the rest of daytime in quality.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • @TaoboiI ran into Dani’s favorite party planner again tonight

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
    • I was watching some August 1987 episodes and they brought back so many memories. I had some thoughts: Lisa and Jamie were so dull. Lisa was such a nothing character. It boggles my mind that so much story was centered around her in such a short amount of time. Joanna Going is a talented actress, but the material was just not there.  It was so good to see Wallingford and Mitch again. I know there was talk about Felicia a while back, but these episodes reminded me how integral Felicia was for the show.  Sally Spencer was done so dirty. She is turning in superb performances in an icky storyline. I wish she had stuck around longer. She has chemistry with everyone. The McKinnons should have lasted longer. Spencer had some strong stuff with Stephen Schnetzer and Mary Alexander. AW waster such a talented actress by getting rid of her. Justice for Cheryl too. I also missed Ed Fry when he left. Sandra Ferguson was a star from the moment she came on. She was charismatic and just popped. She had immediate chemistry with RKK and blended in well with Wyndham and Watson. I'd forgotten about the teenage Matthew.  I have no memory of Peggy Lazarus. She must not have lasted long. Was the original plan for John that he was going to turn out to be the twins' real father?      
    • If the new and improved copies that @rsclassicfanforever has uploaded can be manually moved into the "by month, by year" folders, that would be awesome. I personally don't think it's necessary to keep the older versions (which either have Dutch subtitles hard coded on them, or are lesser in picture quality). That's a lot of valuable drive space that could be cleared. Just my view but can appreciate others may feel differently. The structure had been by month by year previously, so I think it would be easier to conform to that, where so much prior work to get it to that format has already been done. Hopefully you can "drag and drop" so the new copies are in the right month/year? Re Clips, I never look at them now we pretty much have the episodes in full. Appreciate others may use, however. Thanks for all your hard work here @BoldRestless!
    • Oh yes defintely, Josh Griffith repeats and repeats the same storylines.
    • Isnt’t this storyline similar to the Cameron Kirsten situation though? Sharon thought she killed him. He ended up being alive and Sharon was being tormented with thinking she was seeing his face everywhere and that’s how we got that iconic scene with her and Nikki in the sewers.   I understand in Mariah’s case this is different circumstances but it does seem like a play on that whole thing. Maybe I’m wrong. I just wish if they were going to make any character follow in Sharon’s foot steps it would be Faith. Mariah wasn’t even raised by her, and her personality is different. I would expect her to take a different path. I understand I could be completely jumping ahead because the storyline hasn’t even played out yet but we’ll see. 
    • Thanks again @Paul Raven Monica was completely without redeeming qualities at this point. I always found the whole Monica = Carly narrative regressive, as I don't think shows comparing characters so heavily is ever a great idea, but she's actually worse than Carly was. Was it the Pollocks who had Leslie have a miscarriage?  Giving her a child, especially by rape, was not a good idea, but a part of me wishes they'd committed to it just to see what story it might have had in later years.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy