Jump to content

January 1-5, 2007


R!ck

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 52
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I am with you, skiman. Hopefully NBC grabs a clue, puts some fear into JER (hell, maybe he could have a miracle from God HIMSELF and the apparition forces him to write well and with all his GOD-given talents), and we can have the best "Passions" ever. No holds barred, incredible pace...but the same wacky, madcap show!! :wub:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I love Pheila! I tuned in because of Vincent Irizarry's move over there... and I know a lot of AMC folks did as well. But what we found was a very well done soap (despite a few flaws- any show will have a few flaws). There are very few stories on Y and R right now I don't like.. and i'm a relative newbie. I think Y and R is getting some ABC viewers tuning in, and it's keeping them because it's a good show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

What's happened to the detailed ratings info you we used to get? We haven't gotten HH, share, or total viewers info since Nov 6-10. Have we lost access to that information or the person who used to compile it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I so wish CBS would insist it's affiliates (especially the big markets) run GL in the afternoon, opposite GH, across the country. I'd really be curious to see how it would do against GH (better than many think!) and how it's ratings would do if it had a consistant time in all markets across the country.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

CBS moved GL from its cushy 3 pm slot in 1995 mainly because of perennial time slot leader GH. Back then, GL was #7 or 8 in the ratings, same as they are now. Given GH's recently declining ratings, it would be very interesting to see how GL would do now in the ratings against GH if it was back in its old time slot in all of the markets. But since Dr. Phil is doing rather well in that time slot, it's rather unlikely. However, it would be nice to see GL back on at 3 pm, at least in some of the major markets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Good for Days landing third place yet again! Although, I would be happier with more than a 2.7...

For the first time in about a year and a half, I have started watching the show regularly again...and it is actually GOOD for the first time in YEARS...! I think we are sure to see stable numbers from DAYS for a while to come!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I totally understand your sloths concern about it and I agree with you. Let’s hope the show plays it’s cards right.    Further comments about the last few episodes: - I liked that one of the attendees was filming the scene. That’s realistic. I wonder if the writers will follow up with that.  - Martin and Smitty trying to drag Leslie out was very heteronormative, so perfectly in line with them two as characters lol.    As for the future: it’s obvious the Duprees will come to accept Eva one way or another, but the rivalry with Kay should be here for the long term   On the topic of acting: the only bad actors I’m seeing are Ted and Derek. Tomas hasn’t proven to be either good or bad, so far, but he’s certainly mediocre and uncharismatic. He sucks the energy out of the scenes and I don’t see any couple of women ever vying for him. 
    • I’m trying to think which actors VW were working with at the time, and none of them had been there for a while. Even like Mac and Ada didn’t have that big of a part in Rachel’s storyline.  And Jamie was involved with all that movie stuff.
    • Brooke did ads before ATWT too. That probably helped get her the job. After ATWT she seemed to branch more into hosting, along with ads.  I think I saw Kelley in an ad or two, but you're right she wasn't on as much. 
    •   Thanks for sharing these. I wonder if Charles might have been in the running for Adam. I know Preacher was a bit of a bad boy at times on EON, but Neal seemed to be a step down, and Robert Lupone had played a similar part on AMC. Given the huge cast turnover at this point I wonder who thought they had been there long enough to go.  Laura Malone/Chris Rich would get a remote within the next year. 
    • Interesting.  It seems to allude to that statement that Warren Burton made around that time about some AW actors getting special treatment.  I wonder who was resentful about not getting to go. 
    • Good morning, boys!  I figured that it was time that our Gio was introduced into the hotness thread

      Please register in order to view this content

      @ranger1rg I even included a close up of his face for ya!
    • Under all of Madonna's social media today there is this wave of negative, toxic, absurd comments by Lady Gaga fans telling her how Gaga surpassed her in concert in Copacabana. I mean... Who the hell cares? Why are these fan communities so freaking toxic??? I'm sure Madonna doesn't care... But still. Have some respect for M. Leave her social media alone. Go cheer Gaga and be happy. Why come and spew hate on M??? Crazy world.
    • FYI, again, Ruth/Letitia is not in either of these 2 episodes. So that concludes the 4 episodes I had from Nov. 1983. I don't have the October episodes.
    • Eddie has begun uploading the 1990 episodes. I'm so happy about that. I was mindfully taking a break till there's plenty of episodes I can binge watch when I feel like it. Now that 1989 is complete... I can't wait to press play on February 1989 and resume where I left off.
    • Please register in order to view this content

      Me when someone asks me to be proper and demure. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy