Jump to content

DAYS: "Geezers, Step Aside!"


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Why can't he add a villain in the 40 -50 range? I understand where he is coming from, but I'd think Steve/Kayla, Bo/Hope and John/Marlena would still have SOME story left, and who is going to be the one playing against them? I don't argue the need for new villains, and Phillip/EJ will be good playing against Sami, Lucas, Belle, Shawn, Mimi, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 106
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

This news is ironic, because just last week I was watching John Aniston and wishing he was 20 years younger. LOL. Aging is part of the living process, but it makes me sad that it will force him to pass the torch. He's such an amazing actor.

With that being said, I understand that this is a necessity. You can't beat Mother Time! Like some others said, I hope too that Victor continues to be a mentor to Phillip. He might not be the front man, but he sure can provide some advice on the side. Same with Stefano. I'll never get tired of Joe Mascolo. Not ever. But they've scored big time with EJ and James Scott. He makes total sense to lead the new generation of Dimeras.

Since Hogan has taken the time to define the younger characters and give them separate personalities, they'll be much more tolerable now. They won't skip from gazebos to Dot.com to Salem High to some ghoul girl storyline. The interaction between all ages is so much better, and I don't see that one generation will be seen more predominantly than another. We just need a new generation of bad guys. Makes sense to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

First, he didn't ruin EJ. The character of EJ is a villain -- we've known that for months. It's not as if he was some saintly hero who suddenly turned into a rapist. HE'S A BAD GUY. There's no ruination, IMO. Bad guys do bad things.

And the comment about JER not "drastically changing characters to suit a storyline," that's the biggest joke I've read on this board in the last fifteen minutes!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

EJ didn't change from a good guy instantly. He was questionable right from the get-go. We don't know whether he was good or bad. Eventually, he revealed his true colors. You can't have a character acting out of character when they've just been introduced! I think the only reason most people are upset is because they wanted an "Ejami" pairing. Well, this story is bigger than some stupid hot-shot fling. EJ is a bigger plan and his presence is going to have a ripple effect across the entire canvas. You get more story out of that than some pairing with Sami Brady. I mean, just look at all her other boy-toys... Brandon, Franco and Austin. Two are gone, and the other's six feet under.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes, this title is harsh but the point is correct. A newer generation is needed to maintain the legacy of the big baddies and I think DAYS has struck gold with this concept.

They are honouring the vets and the history of the show by bring the DiMera legacy back to life in fine form. And Phillip can potentially become the best, complex character in the history of Days. The measure will be their complexity and the actor's performance... needless to say, we can't have any more cartoon villians ala Tony or Jan Spears. What Days is trying to do is layer its villians and making them part of the show's rich fabric is important.

Just look at what Hogan has done with EJ to situate him as Stephano's heir:

Sami, Marlena's daughter, is EJ"s Queen of the Night. Perfect.

EJ is concerned with family and legacy, just like Stephano.

EJ has situated himself with the entire Brady clan and with Stephano's ex-mistress, Kate.

These connections are rich with history and tradition.

As for the newer Phillip, his motivations are clear and reasonable. He was betrayed (in his mind) by his wife and parents and went to war in a huff. He's already a war hero and now he's been further victimized. Maybe he feels betrayed by his country, who knows. But all these betrayals are evidence that Phillip did not capitalize on all the entitlements he was given as a rich heir. Now he's back, he's pissed and he's a force. Victor is trying to buy his love back. The story is more about making amends with Phillip (from Victor's POV) and hurting Shawn and Belle then it is about loving Claire. But Phillip did raise Claire as his own and he feels he's entitled to his daughter. He's not going to let anyone walk all over him anymore. Hell hath no fury like a young, rich boy scorned.

Both EJ and Phillip are complex characters, not cartoon villians. With the right stories they can be developed, over time, into major players in Salem. They have reasonable roots and seemingly unlimited resources. I for one am excited to watch them develop.

And I agree with the poster who wants to see them eventually square off. Perhaps EJ will scorn Kate and Phillip will come to her side. Or perhaps Phillip will grow a crisis of family and come to his big brother's side when EJ comes after Bo. Who knows... but when it happens it will be just deserts, especially given that their two leading ladies are both Marlena's daughter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm really intrigued by this "new Phillip."

He's been betrayed by his wife, causing him to rush off into a war and lose his face. Now, he has a "new" face, and he's already lost a leg. Surely, he has alot of pent up anger and aggression inside. On the surface, he might appear to be some Leatherface-esque disfigured bastard villain -- but at the center of him is a heart and a reason. And none of it is contrived or fake... just all slowly developed and now we have years worth of rich story because of it.

Hogan has brought the show back SLOWLY and now it has rich possibilities... much moreso than what we would've gotten with a quick fix. He's gotten us to know the characters again, and gotten the characters to know each other again. Now that we care and are invested again, and the characters are all interwoven in multi-generational stories, it makes the dramatic impact so much more hard hitting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

ITA with you Kenny about Ejami being a big reason why some people aren't liking EJ being the new DiMera villian. Given the choice between yet another fly-by-night romance or a long-lasting vendetta story involving major players, the writers were correct in taking the DiMera/Brady feud to the next level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I hope it works, but now Phillip is being changed too.

I don't like it. I hope everyone else does.

And yes, EJ was changed overnight from complex to thug. (This is not about Ejami. I would love them to get together. But it wouldn't make me stop watching if they didn't. What made me stop is ruining EJ and other things such as Billie and Nick.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree, they were written a lot more maturely, that's something that needs to happen with the new youngsters to actually make something fruitful come out of their (the young actors') talents.

I agree with this also, yes Scott is charismatic and inspired a lot of instantaneous love but honestly anyone who thinks this was a case of character defamation is on something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You're right. Phillip is being changed. And that's a good thing. He was nothing but a cardboard prop before he left. Thank God he started showing signs of characterization before he left the last time... and even then, he was a furious hothead. He ran off to war because he felt betrayed by his wife, lost his child and ended up losing his face. Is he supposed to come back all smiles or something?

It's called character evolution. As characters go through experiences, they change... they grow... they become more complex and layered. Phillip has gone through alot, and it's bound to make an impact on the person that he is.

Now, I'd love to see Chloe come back for just a few episodes and see what her former love has turned into. I think that might be an interesting dynamic to play. Phillip, a man who's furious and scorned and hellbent on destruction, re-connecting with his first love... and MURDERING her. Bwahahaha!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • It’s not about a lack of faith and trust in MVJ, it’s about a a lack of faith and trust in Ron Carlivati, who I think can be very sneaky and manipulative when he wants to be.  And, all that “He’s just a breakdown writer” talk never changed my mind about anything, because at Days, it was “just a breakdown writer” that gave us some of the worst episodes I’ve ever seen. 
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • @TaoboiI ran into Dani’s favorite party planner again tonight

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
    • I was watching some August 1987 episodes and they brought back so many memories. I had some thoughts: Lisa and Jamie were so dull. Lisa was such a nothing character. It boggles my mind that so much story was centered around her in such a short amount of time. Joanna Going is a talented actress, but the material was just not there.  It was so good to see Wallingford and Mitch again. I know there was talk about Felicia a while back, but these episodes reminded me how integral Felicia was for the show.  Sally Spencer was done so dirty. She is turning in superb performances in an icky storyline. I wish she had stuck around longer. She has chemistry with everyone. The McKinnons should have lasted longer. Spencer had some strong stuff with Stephen Schnetzer and Mary Alexander. AW waster such a talented actress by getting rid of her. Justice for Cheryl too. I also missed Ed Fry when he left. Sandra Ferguson was a star from the moment she came on. She was charismatic and just popped. She had immediate chemistry with RKK and blended in well with Wyndham and Watson. I'd forgotten about the teenage Matthew.  I have no memory of Peggy Lazarus. She must not have lasted long. Was the original plan for John that he was going to turn out to be the twins' real father?      
    • If the new and improved copies that @rsclassicfanforever has uploaded can be manually moved into the "by month, by year" folders, that would be awesome. I personally don't think it's necessary to keep the older versions (which either have Dutch subtitles hard coded on them, or are lesser in picture quality). That's a lot of valuable drive space that could be cleared. Just my view but can appreciate others may feel differently. The structure had been by month by year previously, so I think it would be easier to conform to that, where so much prior work to get it to that format has already been done. Hopefully you can "drag and drop" so the new copies are in the right month/year? Re Clips, I never look at them now we pretty much have the episodes in full. Appreciate others may use, however. Thanks for all your hard work here @BoldRestless!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy