Jump to content

The Wacky World Of Daytime Ratings


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 5
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I think many thinks can be said about the decline in viewership and what caused it. But this article points to a big one. When daytime quit writing for the whole audience and started targeting certain groups is when daytime began to falter to me. And it has gone downhill ever since.

I will use Days as an example. They wanted the teen audience and they wrote for them. They bragged about being #1 in that younger viewership. When they did they sent a big FU to their other viewers. Many of them tuned out during this time, and Days has struggled to get them back ever since.

I used to think like the majority that targeting and using certain fan bases was the biggest problem with most of daytime, but in the last year I have changed that opinion alot. Fan bases are a good and bad thing but I just don't believe they have as much influence on the ratings as I once thought.

I still hold to my theory if a writer or producer would come on and write stories that would appeal to all demographics and give all something to tune in for, the show would succeed.

I disagree with the poster who says Y&R is writing for the younger audience. Right now they have stories that appeal to all ages and I am anxious to see how their ratings are going to be. They have a big young love triangle with Adrian/JT/Colleen, they have the Carmen Mesta Story, the Phelia story, Brads story for the middle age groups, and then they have thier oldest cast member Jeanne Cooper featured in a big story right now.

They are writing for all groups, and I like that.

And they are also the only show right now that are featuring several differet minorities in leading stories.

With all that I am anxious to see if their ratings continue on the rise they started a few weeks ago. Of course this week they stayed the same. I will watch next weeks and teh weeks following to see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

If your going to post an article you need to link or credit. And don't change add or edit it's content..

Here's the original atricle from pasionscentral.com

Soaps By Numbers: SOD

By: Randee Dawn

September 7, 1999

Soap fans, stand and be counted. Now, everyone who's not a woman aged 18-49, sit down and shut up. Once upon a time, household ratings, as measured by Nielsen Media Research, told the tale of which shows would succeed and which would fail. Nowadays' thanks to technology that measures specific categories of viewers -- demographics -- what counts is not how many are watching, but rather who's watching. And if you want your "who"-ness to count in daytime, you'd best be a woman between the ages of 18 and 49. As soap viewership wanes, the networks are scrambling to find a formula that's going to help them survive into the next century -- and attracting an audience that advertisers will pay more to reach helps compensate for the everdwindling viewership.

Blame ABC for advertisers' interest in a younger audience. Nielsen has always kept some demographic information, usually though handwritten diaries, but in the 1980s, demographics became more easily catalogued thanks to the in-home automated "People Meter." But prior to the 1960s, NBC and CBS weren't much interested in demos. Then ABC came along. "ABC was the new kid on the block," points out Joe Mandese, editor of The Meyers Report, a daily media industry newsletter. "And didn't have big household numbers." Much like the Fox, The WB and UPN networks of today, he continues, "They noticed they did very well in urban markets with younger households. So they made up the argument that this was the audience marketers really wanted to watch."

ABC began requesting demographic information from Nielsen to prove their point. "It became the way ABC differentiated themselves from the older audience," says Mandese. "They did very well by not having the highest rating, but having big numbers in the demos."

Using numbers selectively to shore up support for programming is no longer an ABC domain; NBC and CBS caught on soon after ABC adopted the demo strategy. These days, each network uses the information that Nielsen releases to "skew" things their own way. "Networks like to promote what they have, and if they're winning in the 18 to 49 bracket, that becomes the most important demographic to them," asserts Mandese.

"Demographics is what people [at NBC] look at," explains SUNSET BEACH Executive Producer Gary Tomlin. "The 18 to 49 [slot] is really the make-or-break numbers."

Susan Lee, senior vice president of daytime programming at NBC, believes that the vast household numbers are less important than a "pure" demographic of young viewers. "You want to know that you are appealing exactly to your audience, that you're not throwing [programming] out there and half the audience isn't even interested. To be honest, if we only appeal to 50-somethings, our daypart will be dead in 20 years."

But over at the Tiffany network, they like their older audience just fine. "CBS generally is the oldest-skewing network," says David Poltrak, executive vice president for planning and research at CBS. "You're not going to mess with a show like YOUNG AND RESTLESS to get a younger demographic because you risk alienating the audience that you currently have."

Unlike, say, CBS's competitors? You have NBC putting on a show like PASSIONS," Poltrak continues, "and it starts off with virtually no audience to begin with, then goes down and they declare, 'Well, we're getting a lot of teenage girls.' Which is good for them, but they're all going to go back to school in September, and what are you going to do then?"

Meanwhile, ABC is sitting in the catbird seat, consistently drawing the highest key demographics and looking for ways to ensure that, that will continue. "We're really appealing to a broad audience," says Carole Smith, vice president of daytime research for ABC. "There's a difference between what the advertisers are looking for and what we are looking to give our audience. Not that we don't do it at the expense of older viewers or story."

What will work -- that is, what will draw the "right" sort of audience in and keep them there -- is a subject of contention. "YOUNG AND RESTLESS delivers a huge household and a really good demo," notes NBC's Lee. "but you're not getting a pure number with that show; you're getting pure women, but it drops off with women 18-49. If you look at DAYS OF OUR LIVES, their household isn't nearly what Y&R's is, but they deliver as pure, if not purer [demographic] numbers. DAYS will give you more bang for your buck."

The theory at CBS is what Poltrak calls the "mother-daughter phenomenon. That's what we're playing. We've been able to carry soap operas from one generation to another through that kind of relationship, as opposed to trying to create a soap opera that the daughters will watch in their bedrooms while their mothers are watching something else."

In the long run, you're going to live and die by the ratings," shrugs BEACH's Tomlin. "there are certain shows that can say, 'screw it, we're going to do what we want to do,' and there are other shows, like our show or PORT CHARLES, where we feel, 'Oh, my God; what do we have to do to get people to watch?' "

And while some networks are panicking, others eagerly await the arrival of aging baby boomers into their key demographics. There are advantages to being the oldest-skewing network. "As a boomer myself, I expect them to keep our numbers high for another 40 or 50 years'" grins CBS's Poltrak. "I'm looking forward to the 85-plus demo."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I was watching some August 1987 episodes and they brought back so many memories. I had some thoughts: Lisa and Jamie were so dull. Lisa was such a nothing character. It boggles my mind that so much story was centered around her in such a short amount of time. Joanna Going is a talented actress, but the material was just not there.  It was so good to see Wallingford and Mitch again. I know there was talk about Felicia a while back, but these episodes reminded me how integral Felicia was for the show.  Sally Spencer was done so dirty. She is turning in superb performances in an icky storyline. I wish she had stuck around longer. She has chemistry with everyone. The McKinnons should have lasted longer. Spencer had some strong stuff with Stephen Schnetzer and Mary Alexander. AW waster such a talented actress by getting rid of her. Justice for Cheryl too. I also missed Ed Fry when he left. Sandra Ferguson was a star from the moment she came on. She was charismatic and just popped. She had immediate chemistry with RKK and blended in well with Wyndham and Watson. I'd forgotten about the teenage Matthew.  I have no memory of Peggy Lazarus. She must not have lasted long. Was the original plan for John that he was going to turn out to be the twins' real father?      
    • If the new and improved copies that @rsclassicfanforever has uploaded can be manually moved into the "by month, by year" folders, that would be awesome. I personally don't think it's necessary to keep the older versions (which either have Dutch subtitles hard coded on them, or are lesser in picture quality). That's a lot of valuable drive space that could be cleared. Just my view but can appreciate others may feel differently. The structure had been by month by year previously, so I think it would be easier to conform to that, where so much prior work to get it to that format has already been done. Hopefully you can "drag and drop" so the new copies are in the right month/year? Re Clips, I never look at them now we pretty much have the episodes in full. Appreciate others may use, however. Thanks for all your hard work here @BoldRestless!
    • Oh yes defintely, Josh Griffith repeats and repeats the same storylines.
    • Isnt’t this storyline similar to the Cameron Kirsten situation though? Sharon thought she killed him. He ended up being alive and Sharon was being tormented with thinking she was seeing his face everywhere and that’s how we got that iconic scene with her and Nikki in the sewers.   I understand in Mariah’s case this is different circumstances but it does seem like a play on that whole thing. Maybe I’m wrong. I just wish if they were going to make any character follow in Sharon’s foot steps it would be Faith. Mariah wasn’t even raised by her, and her personality is different. I would expect her to take a different path. I understand I could be completely jumping ahead because the storyline hasn’t even played out yet but we’ll see. 
    • Thanks again @Paul Raven Monica was completely without redeeming qualities at this point. I always found the whole Monica = Carly narrative regressive, as I don't think shows comparing characters so heavily is ever a great idea, but she's actually worse than Carly was. Was it the Pollocks who had Leslie have a miscarriage?  Giving her a child, especially by rape, was not a good idea, but a part of me wishes they'd committed to it just to see what story it might have had in later years.
    • @janea4old Your detailed explanation and delving into the psychology and motivations is no doubt the opposite of what we will see onscreeen. As @ranger1rg stated we will get a few scenes and some sketchy explanations. Like the adoption of Aria, most of it will take place off screen.
    • I'm suddenly fearful that DAYS is going to pull a Flowers-for-Algernon stunt and Bo's progress will be reversed.  While @te. is stuck on Abe's tiny bedroom, I can't stop thinking of the size of Bo's huge hospital room.
    • Okay, why are Paulina and Abe sleeping like that?!  I'd take a screen grab if I wasn't lazy, but come on.
    • All caught up on this week's episodes. Deidre Hall has done the best work of her career with this series of episodes. That is her tribute to Drake. Every acting choice has been perfect. From her reaction the moment John flatlined, to her snapping at Abe and Paulina (what a smart, realistic writing choice), to her grief playing the text message over and over. Josh Taylor did the best work of his career in the scene with Kayla telling him John had died. Everything about his facial expression, voice, pronunciation, everything was so different from what he usually does. He was overcome with the emotion of it and any of his acting tics disappeared. Peter Reckell and Kristian Alfonso were great. One thing I noticed with the flashbacks of John/Marlena and Bo/Hope is that Bo and Hope are constantly smiling at each other. The chemistry those two have cannot be faked. It's clear the writing team decided to clean up Bo and Hope and give fans a happy ending for them, neatly wrapped up in a bow. The juxtaposition of Bo and Hope reclaiming their happiness thanks to John, while Marlena is dealt life's harshest blow from John's sacrifice, was another great writing choice. Marlena even saying that to Eric, that she is paying for Bo's recovery with John's life, was such smart writing. Susan Seaforth Hayes was used very effectively between the two storylines. I really enjoyed the scene of Kate talking to Philip, calmly stating that she will make Xander pay. Overall, the show should be lining these episodes up for the Emmys and Deidre should be carefully choosing her scenes for her own reel. She deserves a Best Actress Emmy for this work. The first time I have felt that way about her work. Peter Reckell should submit himself for Guest for the scenes where he found out Victor is dead because he was genuinely heartbreaking. Josh Taylor should throw his name down for Supporting Actor for his scenes. The show deserves a Writing and Best Show for what they've done with the episodes around John and Bo. It was heavy stuff and I feel for the actors. I am so impressed with what they did.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy