Jump to content

Ann Coulter


Scott

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Well said.

This country doesn't know when to butt out sometimes.

And no, that doesn't make a bad american, that makes me a realist. I love this country but we need to know when enough is enough and stop flexing our political muscles in the perverbial global gym.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 44
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Great post DevotedtoAMC. Applause and a standing ovation!!

George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld and Condileeza Rice are killers for starting this war. Also, W and his administration are the worst President and administration in US history. W and his cronies are terrorists IMHO----attacking Iraq. They planned this even before 9/11 and that's a fact Kwing!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Then don't forget all the people JFK and LBJ killed in their war.

What a pathetic statement

My brother, who is on his way to Baghdad next month will not be KILLED by the President if anything happens to him. He will be killed by those that hate America and hate freedom and he is well aware of that.

I suggest you refrain from making such statements unless you get your butt in the military and learn what being in the military is all about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Excuse me, but I served in the military for two years. My father, grandfather and great grandfather all served their countries. They were considered war heroes. But they fought because they were necessary wars. This one is COMPLETELY and UTTERLY not needed. Its going on because the coward we call a president wants to go down as a leader who led his country into bloodshed when in reality when he was called into battle he did everything he could to AVOID it. Our VP got out of the draft simply because, as he said "I had better things to do. Like college." Apparently they are exempt from having their lives at risk while young men fresh out of high school are blown up on the side of the roads simply because "we have to be there to flex our muscles."

Next time you tell us to "get our butts in the military" you better learn who already took the initiative and stood up to serve their country. And for those who don't choose to enlist, good for them. They have their own beliefs and should stand firmly by them. You chose your path in life. So have we. Get over it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

i'd love to have had the opportunity to serve...however, my country, the land of the free and home of the brave, the country that wants to spread freedom and democracy to the middle east, won't let me serve openly in my military, even when the majority of our allies let gays and lesbians serve openly. they tax my paycheck to help fund their causes, my money is good for them, however, the person that God created me to be isn't. isn't that sad? hell...i'd like to just be able to donate blood...yet once again, i'm not needed even though there is a terrible shortage of blood in my area. i live on a street of 12 houses. 6 couples are divorced, two homes have the mom's "shacking up" with their boyfriends, yet, my partner and i are not invited to the block party...and they feel the need to protect marriage from folks like me? i dunno...i just don't get it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

People need to get off their high horse. I'm sick to death of the argument that homosexuality is a threat to hetrosexual marriage. I want to know how the hell is that when we are doing a wonderful job of destroying on our own. Who are we to say whats right when have made such a fine mess of marriage in the last several years. Its become almost a joke, actually no scratch that, it IS a joke.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Kwing, Richard Nixon also had a part in Vietnam-----even though you Republicans, especially neo-cons, seem to forget that and that Tricky Dicky only ended the Nam crap because of the American public's strong disapproval of it.

I sincerely hope your brother doesn't get killed in Iraq and I will pray for his safety as I do for our troops. But if he is unfortantely killed in Iraq, George W. Bush and his administration will be partially responsible (IMHO, more than 50% responsible, since W had NO BUSINESS sending our servicemen and women to Iraq in the first place!!!)

I have every right as an American citizen to make such statements. Kwing, this is a free country and we still have freedom of speech, although I know a lot of you neo-cons sure don't want us to have! One doesn't have to be in the milatary to have an opinion about this horrible, miserable war or any other one for that matter. Kwing, you probably never served in the military yourself!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • There has been some confusion about Michael & facial burns. Please see this post: https://bsky.app/profile/shallotpeel.bsky.social/post/3lqkrryu54226 I've chosen to put this here instead of the Classic Thread because it is now with the appearance of recast Michael that this has come up. Different places online, including at least one podcast, remarks have been made about how remarkable it is that he is without facial scarring. Other fans say it was clear from the first that he did not have facial burns. What is included in this post is 2 screengrabs where you can see his face at the hospital & a very quick edit of that day in the hospital. 
    • Put me in the LOVE KMH camp. As a poster alluded to above, her detractors seem to come from people who first experienced the 80s Emily actress. And that's often the case with soaps, myself included. I enjoy the original actor so much that I just never take to the recast. However, KMH played Emily far longer than the original - for almost 20 years - and when she had great material, she was great. I get the sense she didn't like playing the whiny oh-woe-is-me Emily which was all the material she got from about 1996 until she took over the Intruder in late '99/early '00 and got to play a stronger kiss-ass woman who didn't care what anyone thought of her. (Some would call that a bitch but, if a man was in that role, he'd just be called a smart and savvy businessman.) Her relationship with Hal was great. The transformation was done realistically and I thoroughly enjoyed those years the best out of all. Once the writers decided to break up those two, they went back to writing Emily half the time as whiny and pathetic. I preferred when the writers made her stronger.
    • Hahaha - I do. I've always been the type, though, that can't miss anything. I get FOMO, so I'll not skip episodes or fast forward anything. There are only a few TV shows I've dropped because they got so bad vs. sticking it out to the end.  The promise that GL 1997 is better is what keeps me going. I especially want to see the fallout of Blake's lie about her twins and then Annie's descent which I believe won Watros's Emmy.
    • Rita's rape is an episode i constantly search on YouTube hoping one day that it will show up. I always feel like I may have seen it, but I was only 6 at the time and can never figure any of the things I have vague recollection of 
    • FROM THE VAULT: NON-SOAP DAYTIME RATINGS: HIGHLIGHTS FROM FEBRUARY 1973 & MAY 1973:

      Please register in order to view this content

        FROM THE VAULT: NON-SOAP DAYTIME RATINGS: HIGHLIGHTS FROM AUGUST 1973 & NOVEMBER 1973:
    • The rape was in 1979 after they were married. Blake was the result of Holly cheating with him while she was married to Ed. I believe she was born in 1975. 
    • No. Ed and Holly were married and having problems. She had an affair with Roger and that's when Christina--Blake--was conceived. The rape happened much later, after Holly and Roger were married.
    • Was Blake the product of Roger raping Holly, or did that come after when they were a couple?
    • I really wish we could see that episode...absolutely, my memory could be faulty, it was a very long time ago. I'm not going to contradict what the actors said--there has to be a reason it made them so uncomfortable that they talked about it in the press and complained to TPTB. I think that was the first one where they made the point that they wanted to educate the audience about the subject.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy