DramatistDreamer

For many years, whenever anyone asked Eddie Murphy about Bill Cosby he demurred, out of a sense of obligation until he remembered how critical Cosby had always been of Murphy in his career. If anyone saw that interview Eddie Murphy did with Jerry Seinfeld on his Netflix show Comedians In Cars... it's very clear as to why Murphy no longer felt that sense of obligation, being that Cosby never felt a sense of obligation toward him or any other comedians. Turnabout is fair play. Cosby neglects to see how he's mocked, berated and joked about anyone that didn't fit his ideal of how an entertainer should act or comport him/herself. He was an absolute control freak with Lisa Bonet and he practically made a second career out of chiding low-income black people during his speaking engagements, while holding himself to exception based on fraudulent criteria. Now, he wants to be all 'power to the people' with the same communities he once mocked and derided? Oh puh-lease, Bill.

He and Flavia are really enamored of the word "F" and names that begin with that letter, I guess.

That's really fascinating, it seems like a really good idea and I can imagine other production companies being interested in this. The idea of advertisements being tailored can sound somewhat invasive but years ago, early Hulu used to do interactive commercials, and I imagine individually curated ads will be the next step. I mention this because although Disney's streaming service has been an unmitigated success, the jury is still out on Apple+ and there will come a time very soon where the amount of people willing to subscribe to paid streaming services will reach a saturation point and ad-sponsored streaming will be seen as an attractive option, especially for shows that are not first-time run shows. Also, right now, ads geared toward streaming command less revenue than those aired on broadcast television (thus, it's cheaper to run an ad via online streaming than broadcast therefore the profits from it are less) but as viewing habits continue to change and ratings decline for broadcast and streaming numbers ascend, I expect that the costs of running an ad online will climb and eventually reach parity with those aired on broadcast television, increasing the value of running ads via streaming.

Bill's feelings were clearly hurt, no surprises there. Bill Cosby forgets that just a few years before his trial, he was bashing lower income black people for causing their own poverty with poor clothing choices.

At least he seems to have a bit of self-awareness because, the thing is, he knows they were shitty movies. At least in interviews that I've seen lately. His attitude these days seems to be that he's not denying it and what's done is done, lol, so why regret it?

I've only seen a handful of episodes over the last, what five years? And last night's show was one of the better paced shows (yes, it's true) and at the very least, this episode overall didn't drag like it normally has whenever I've watched it over the years. I agree that Mr. Robinson's Neighborhood (and I knew that gentrification would be included but it was still funny), The Family Christmas Toast sketch were the funniest overall. I also think the Gumby riff was pretty funny, especially when Gumby bitterly complained that he rescued the show from the gutter and didn't get thanks and then proceeded to say "Shame on you, Lorne Michaels! Shame on you!", I felt some subtext there. I know a lot of people really liked the final sketch about global warming hitting the North Pole. It got some chuckles from me, especially the reference to the real life incident of the man who helped rescue those young women in Cleveland. I don't understand why they had Maya Rudolph with a martini glass but the bit with Kamala Harris quoting Lizzo with saying she was taking her fine aS$ self out of the presidential race and how America missed out and could've had a "bad b*tch" made me laugh. Eddie Murphy slipped and said sh*t but I don't know if people caught that Maya Rudolph actually said what sounded like the F word, as in 'that's f*cked up' or something to that extent. I don't think that was in the script and people had various interpretations on what it meant but it was pretty obvious that Rudolph ad-libbed that part. Someone said the humor was milder (but still funny) than what it would've been when Murphy was in the cast in the '80s and I tend to agree. Then again, the humor on this show was a lot sharper in the 80s overall, I think. I bet it's been forever since SNL could be described as 'appointment viewing'. Last night was definitely one of those moments. I just had a thought that the only thing that would've boosted that row of comedians during the opening monologue even more would've been to have Garrett Morris there. Hope he's alright wherever he is.

If the showrunner is going to give her perspective, then the NDA really should be dropped so that the actress will also be free to tell her perspective. Also, why is it not surprising that CBS is the parent company? What a mess. Again. I haven't seen enough of this series to judge whether the showrunner avoids being the chauvinist and misogynist that she claims not to be. She is right however, to assert that women indeed can be misogynist and exhibit chauvinistic tendencies that bend toward favoring male chauvinism. From what I read of the character Alison's arc and who seems to take on the 'blame' for the character's end though, I found somewhat disturbing but again, I haven't seen the entire series so perhaps I'm jumping to a judgement, a bit? As a writer myself, I don't want to make assumptions without watching or at least reading the script.

Is this a surprise to anyone though?

I posted this article in the Media/Journalism thread but I decided to post here too because 1.) I really think it's a fascinating article and 2.) I think this is something that web based soaps and even soaps that would think about reboots or revivals should think about as a possibility, especially as it really seems like a high-tech digital twist on an aspect of the early days of television soaps-- the product placement. Could you imagine if the PP/TOLN soaps would have been able to do this? Procter & Gamble could easily do this if they were able to get their collective heads out of their as$es and to a reboot of As The World Turns and/or Guiding Light. You See Pepsi, I See Coke: New Tricks for Product Placement

Fascinating article. So far, ads geared to streaming still don't have the same market value as those on aired broadcast television, which is likely why there has been such a slow embrace of streaming by many production companies but high-tech digital product placement could change that calculus. https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/companies/you-see-pepsi-i-see-coke-new-tricks-for-product-placement/ar-BBYceC2

These individual accounts of people victimized by criminals that Kentucky Gov. Matt Bevin has just chosen to pardon are enraging. Reading about the mother of a girl who had been sexually assaulted when she was 9, collapsing to the floor upon hearing the news that the perpetrator had just left prison on a pardon is making the anger boil within me. Awful.

Oh my! Was that intentional? Did they rehearse that? I know that Jimmy Walker's tomfoolery over the years would cause many to slam a door in his face if given the opportunity.

I missed both shows. This was the only thing I saw and honestly, I'm fine with that.

Cheers to her for not actually going through with a wedding to Bogdanovitch though. Wise choice.

Wow, I had no idea that baby #2 was on the way for Flavia and Fabio!

ICYMI, there was a fatal shooting (fatal to the shooter, mainly) outside the headquarters of the FSB in Moscow, which apparently occurred hours after Putin gave his annual press conference. Moscow shooting: Deadly attack on FSB security headquarters Another ICYMI, Mark Meadows who once claimed he would send President Obama back to Kenya ("or wherever he's from") is not seeking re-election. I read that he is the 21st GOP Congressman to announce retirement or not seeking re-election. Good riddance.

No doubt, part of it stems from their own personal desire to create a brand-new character whose history they can totally make up without having to regard the show's history--but then they end up making up some silly connection to a longtime character anyway to "anchor" the new character. What's the point of this if you're going to connect to a longtime character in the end?? To mess up the longtime character's history by inserting events that never existed? The other part, I suspect, stems from sheer laziness and belligerence- not wanting to do any research about the existing characters' connection to other longtime characters. Had they got it right though, it would actually enrich the show's canvas, but I realize asking these writers and production folk to get things right is probably a big ask.

Oh, I can believe it! She's being supported by dark money from Hindutva and an army of Russian trolls.

Tulsi is a feckless twit and I'd expect nothing less from her.

I told y'all I only started checking into these actors private lives and bios since I joined this board a few years ago. Before that, all I really checked for were the technical aspects of the show as well as what was onscreen.

Wait, Jack's not related to Robert Wagner? I'm so embarrassed but what a relief!

Completely forgot about that one! Did anyone mention Jack Wagner (GH, B&B), son of actor Robert Wagner yet?

These debates can veer into grandstanding. I'm going to tune in at about 6:30 pm or so when the voting has begun in earnest.

Ethan Wayne (Storm Logan #1, B&B) son of actor John Wayne. Carrie Mitchum (Donna Logan #1, B&B) granddaughter of actor Robert Mitchum.