Jump to content

The "foreign soaps" topic


Huntress

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 620
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

The article must have come from early Friday as Five picked it up a couple of hours after the BBC dropped it. To be fair, the BBC have essentially paid a price for the show over the past few years that doesn't reflect the number of viewers it brings to BBC daytime. The problem comes from the BBC's public service remit and the difficulty in justifying paying for such a populist show. EastEnders at least has pretensions of being socially relevant whereas Neighbours is honest to God soap opera.

Five will treat it well. When they poached H&A from ITV 6 or 7 years ago, they gave it a publicity campaign never before seen in the UK for an individual show. The extra money will also go towards a higher quality product as far as production values are concerned with the High Definition change.

Anyway EastEnders...I think the May/Dawn story is going to twist a little. The show's having a bit of a publicity blitz at the moment (though they've humorously changed the tagline from "everybody's talking about it" to "there's more to EastEnders") and a print ad in one of the tabloids showed May offering Dawn cash.

Also a friend of mine told me that Rob has actually hit May this past week -- I assumed it was a lie on her part.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The ones I'm getting tonight are also heavy on Dot. A brilliantly written trip where Dot's faith was confronted landed her with an abandoned baby. Then Gary's mother Hazel showed up.

Then Jim Branning went to some kind of prostitution club with Russian girl hookers looking for the mother who later turned up at their house.

So again they seem to be stacking up more new characters.

There was also a lot of fun with Mo trying to prove Dot had a baby. Some of this material was hilarious.

It was actually a welcome relief from all that May-Dawn-Rob stuff. That is getting tiresome even though Rob is very good looking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh I'd take Corrie over EastEnders every time. Obviously it has its dull patches like any soap but the writing is so so strong that it's never been absolutely decimated and revamped like EE. I don't know how well it would translate but the humour and well observed characters make it head and shoulders above the rest. Not to mention the number of characters that have been in it since the 60s and 70s and still have front burner stories.

Sunday's episode in particular was one of the best soap episodes I've seen this year. Claire woke to find her house on fire and fell down the stairs getting knocked unconscious. She was eventually rescued but her baby is presumed dead (though it won't prove to be the case as we'll find out the fire was started deliberately to kidnap the baby). What is essentially a very OTT story is grounded in community and characterisation.

I particularly loved Gail running into the pub in nothing but a robe to try and find Claire's husband. No vanity, no pretension. And Eileen breaking down in the hospital later as she'd had dinner at Claire's earlier in the evening and put the baby to bed. "I sang him to sleep and I was terrible! The last thing he ever heard was this awful woman singing to him. It should have been Claire."

If you can get the episodes anywhere like UKNova or whatever or even YouTube, it's well worth the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

A lot of the character based stuff in Corrie comes from kind of...cultural absurdities and I think people might need some kind of knowledge of that. The self-reflexive kind of humour borne out of for example, "chav culture" in this country. It's not all like that and I guess I'm being a tad condescending. If someone watches a foreign show, they do after all usually have some knowledge of that country.

The writers of Corrie. I know that there was a certain staleness behind the scenes up until the mid 90s. Some great great scriptwriters but not so great producers and during that period EE was totally on top of its game in comparison. In 1997, they combatted this by drafting in a new producer Brian Park who went axe crazy and this drove a lot of the seasoned scripters away. It kind of continued in to the early 00s with producer Jane Macnaught who was attempting essentially to copy the darkness of EastEnders and it was dreadful. There was one story in particular with teenager Toyah Battersby being raped in a dingey alleyway that was just so far removed from what the show was about. By this point all those scriptwriters had left so there was no humour to anything. It was all fairly generic.

By around 2001, a former producer came back on board and managed to lure back a considerable number of the old scriptwriters who really turned the show around. I should note that it never had the kind of decline EE has battled but it was substandard. The quality has arguably pretty much stayed up since then with a former Emmerdale head honcho taking over the producer reigns. Jonathan Harvey is a particularly good scriptwriter. He's also done a fair bit of sitcom work. Daran Little also used to be tremendous. He was the Corrie archivist in the 90s who wormed a writing role but a couple of years ago he was either burned out/on an ego trip and jumped ship to do some terrible Hollyoaks spin-off that got canned after one season. I think it was on BBC America recently. Whether he'll crawl back remains to be seen.

I know torrents are readily available online for both should you ever have the time or inclination.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • @Toups Tyler Topits listed in alpha order with the breakdown writers 5/12 Monday episode. O'Connor still listed as both breakdown and script writer. Kreizman wrote today's script.
    • Marland was long gone by this point.  He quit in either August/September 1982. I think it was due to letting the actress play out her contract and use her for party scenes and/or scenes with Phillip/Justin.   I was surprised she was still on in June 1983 myself, because I figured she had been written out before Pam Long joined the writing staff. Thankfully, having episodes uploaded during this period on Spauldingfield YT site has helped to connect some of the dots.  It looks as though Pam Long starts the first week or so of May 1983.. and in those first few weeks: Morgan and Evie were both written off and Lillian/Mindy/Billy/Beth/Annabelle all come onto the show.    
    • @MaximThis really  old song popped into my head this morning .... 

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • For any military veterans and family: Military discount for *NEW* subscribers for any type of ParamountPlus subscription, "for the life of the subscription" (whatever that means). Includes: active duty, retirees, reservists and National Guard, veterans, dependents and spouses. Military veterans will receive 50% off new subscriptions (They have a verification process) https://help.paramountplus.com/s/article/Does-Paramount-offer-Military-discounts For existing subscribers, who would be eligible but haven't used the discount: (from the same paramount help link) Question: I’m an existing ParamountPlus subscriber in the military. How do I get the discount? Answer: To take advantage of the military discount offer*, you’ll first need to cancel your existing subscription, then re-subscribe to Paramount+ [at the verification link] on your desktop or mobile browser. During the signup process, your credentials will be verified to confirm your current status. Once you've been verified, your discount will be applied in the next billing cycle.
    • What a lovely gif!!!!!! @Maxim

      Please register in order to view this content

        @Maxim  
    • I didn’t find it that interesting

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I can't watch until later (Canada issues). What is Philip's motivation for stealing the drug? Only plot I cared about today and you did not mention it 
    • Doug III’s first day of work. Hope he does a good job… or that Tate tries to sabotage him somehow

      Please register in order to view this content

      His scenes with Holly were nice though. They’re sweet together and I understand why some people think that they have more chemistry than Tate/Holly do. And I liked that Doug III opened up to her about his past. Maybe that could lead to something good happening in the future.  I also enjoyed Roman and Kate, and how they’re both being tied into EJ’s shooting. The mystery of it all is really compelling. I don’t think Roman is the shooter though either.  I didn’t have much sympathy for Kristen though. She has no one to blame for Rachel’s problems than herself. But at the same time, I’m really surprised that Days actually remembered the Alex/Kristen fling. I thought Ron had erased that from existence. I’m not shipping them at all, but I’m definitely shipping a permanent end to Brady/Kristen but after today, I’m not so sure about that either.  And, Johnny and Chanel were still great together
    • https://parade.com/news/beyond-the-gates-actor-flexes-like-a-wrestler-in-viral-shirtless-photo
    • Some country club revelation thoughts from a casual watcher no one asked for. The Great: Daphnee Duplaix gave the best performance we've seen yet. Nicole's dialogue was also well thought out and felt character specific. TJ Maxx Ted was also pretty good. Trisha Mann-Grant steals every scene she's in. Often without even trying. Carrying multiple episodes worth of exposition heavy soap dialogue with starts and stops and recapping and drama and humor is no small feat and she nailed. Vernon telling Lesliana to STFU.  The Bad: So much of the dialogue for the rest of the cast was overly written. Martin said "You are a vile human being with a hole in your heart!". Marty, what are we doing? It's SO dramatic and sounds so silly coming from this grown man. Do Bill and Hayley do anything but talk about the Duprees? And the nerve of her to get so excited to find out Ted is a cheater when she and her husband are too. There should be a hint of shame mixed in with your glee, ma'am. The Questionable: Coffee and a rendition of Amazing Grace after finding out Nicole was betrayed by her husband. The Duprees are an odd bunch. The stinger of one segment had Anita prepared to lambast Lesliana, when we came back someone else was talking. When Anita eventually said something to Wig, it was a lukewarm at best. And then of course she thought singing a song about something that should absolutely not be extended to her son-in-law. The entire family allowing this deranged woman to speech at them in their own was...nuts. I know she said something about what would the neighbors say but my GOD. Is she just going to be allowed to trespass whenever she feels like it now? The focus on Leslie and her wig usage as an oddity is...odd. I think Chelsea said something like "and she wears wigs!" (while wearing a buss down middle part). Okay? It's just not that odd for a black woman to change up her hair. It's the different names that's the problem. I know it's meant to be humorous, in a throwback soap kind of way, but it fell flat for me.  I'm sorry I find the whole family to be WEIRD. It's like they want us to see them as ruthless yet benevolent, open yet furtive, snobbish yet tooth achingly sweet all at the same time. I cannot get a lock on the family dynamics. Everyone is just there.  I'm gonna cry if this show doesn't start giving us ages (or close to it!) for these characters. Because if Eva is 21-22 then Martin was being given crayons, a soda pop and blinders when he was 15-17 years old. Martin had to have been under 8 for me to buy this story, which would make Eva and Kat late 20s (Martin is at least 35 since he wants to run for president), which I don't think they're meant to be. It's honestly minor but it bothers me. I've mentioned this to @Vee but I think the optics on opening the show with both sisters discovering their husbands of over 30 years are cheaters should've been considered. I doubt there was any intention behind it, no one's rubbing their hands together as they scheme to say the married black men can't stay loyal but how does it look? Maybe it's just me. Honestly it's probably just me!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy