Jump to content

Y&R Spoilers for Next Week (May 29th)


Recommended Posts

  • Members

So Brad beds Sharon because he is still brooding over what Victoria has done with J.T., while Sharon is hopping in the sack because Nick and Phyllis' infidelity drove her into the arms of the man she has been wanting the minute she learned that he was intrested in Victoria? They both deserve each other. :rolleyes:

I most definitely want to see Sharon's face when she learns that her "new flavor of the moment" has a past and that he might not even be who he says he is.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 21
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

OK? Victoria will learn that her father was right. Remember when Sharon dropped the bomb that Victoria had a one-nighter with J.T. and the news spread like wildfire? Victor told her that NO man, NO man would still be ready to marry a woman who had just slept with another man. Brad just said, "Oh, it's OK." The only thing Brad was upset about is that Victor knew someone else had tagged Victoria's panties and that should have been Brad's moment to kick her to the curb. :lol: Instead of calling off their newly fixed relationship (as he should have done) he decided to still marry her. He doesn't love Victoria. He loves what she can provide his greedy ass. He wanted Sharon at first, but he can get more by marrying victoria. Now he will be married to Victoria AND sleeping with teh one he really wants. A prime example of having one's cake and eating it too. I'll be so glad to tune in when he chokes on said cake.

Sharon and Victoria are both going to lose in this Brad situation. Question is...which woman will lose more?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • BTG: A-  DAYS: B+  Eastenders: C
    • There was a rumor that Jean will die and that’s probably why she’s back then
    • There has been some confusion about Michael & facial burns. Please see this post: https://bsky.app/profile/shallotpeel.bsky.social/post/3lqkrryu54226 I've chosen to put this here instead of the Classic Thread because it is now with the appearance of recast Michael that this has come up. Different places online, including at least one podcast, remarks have been made about how remarkable it is that he is without facial scarring. Other fans say it was clear from the first that he did not have facial burns. What is included in this post is 2 screengrabs where you can see his face at the hospital & a very quick edit of that day in the hospital. 
    • Put me in the LOVE KMH camp. As a poster alluded to above, her detractors seem to come from people who first experienced the 80s Emily actress. And that's often the case with soaps, myself included. I enjoy the original actor so much that I just never take to the recast. However, KMH played Emily far longer than the original - for almost 20 years - and when she had great material, she was great. I get the sense she didn't like playing the whiny oh-woe-is-me Emily which was all the material she got from about 1996 until she took over the Intruder in late '99/early '00 and got to play a stronger kiss-ass woman who didn't care what anyone thought of her. (Some would call that a bitch but, if a man was in that role, he'd just be called a smart and savvy businessman.) Her relationship with Hal was great. The transformation was done realistically and I thoroughly enjoyed those years the best out of all. Once the writers decided to break up those two, they went back to writing Emily half the time as whiny and pathetic. I preferred when the writers made her stronger.
    • Hahaha - I do. I've always been the type, though, that can't miss anything. I get FOMO, so I'll not skip episodes or fast forward anything. There are only a few TV shows I've dropped because they got so bad vs. sticking it out to the end.  The promise that GL 1997 is better is what keeps me going. I especially want to see the fallout of Blake's lie about her twins and then Annie's descent which I believe won Watros's Emmy.
    • Rita's rape is an episode i constantly search on YouTube hoping one day that it will show up. I always feel like I may have seen it, but I was only 6 at the time and can never figure any of the things I have vague recollection of 
    • FROM THE VAULT: NON-SOAP DAYTIME RATINGS: HIGHLIGHTS FROM FEBRUARY 1973 & MAY 1973:

      Please register in order to view this content

        FROM THE VAULT: NON-SOAP DAYTIME RATINGS: HIGHLIGHTS FROM AUGUST 1973 & NOVEMBER 1973:
    • The rape was in 1979 after they were married. Blake was the result of Holly cheating with him while she was married to Ed. I believe she was born in 1975. 
    • No. Ed and Holly were married and having problems. She had an affair with Roger and that's when Christina--Blake--was conceived. The rape happened much later, after Holly and Roger were married.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy