Jump to content

B&B: January 2025 Discussion Thread


Maxim

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 281
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

At this point they've degraded the meaning of the award to a point of no return... I mean... So many undeserving wins. But yeah I agree it will be cool to see her just for the moment to go on stage and have that memory. 

And Baby Jane is the perfection emotion

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The best thing about today's show was Finn's hot chest.

The rest is tired. No woman would've put up with someone like Ridge. 

Brooke reminiscing about the glory hole @Jeff was ridiculous.

Brooke and Taylor are pathetic. Ridge is a loser.

Edited by Soapsuds
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 You got it, darling. 

P.S

I am in the process of catching up with the episodes and God... why is Taylor wearing this bizarre little ensemble? Is there some kind of agenda in making Taylor look... so... matronly... brown and grey? Is Bradley trying to erase her femininity or youth or something. Rebecca is still a very young woman and there is no denying that. If he dressed her with something that would look good on her... she would look younger than Steffy. Maybe that's what he is trying to hide with these wardrobe choices.

And once again Brooke is flat-lining. Just as I'm about to root for her... she flops again. I honestly think this woman at this point is so gaslit and destroyed mentally by Ridge's cold/hot attitude for 40 years... that she has lost any sense of self-respect and dignity. I am giving her a little more time to cry and look pathetic... and then I want to see what I saw couple of days ago. Do it, Bradley! 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I thought the same thing while watching. Taylor's ensemble was tragic.

Of course, no one in the episode was dressed much better. There was barely any style or color anywhere. Brooke wore blue and Donna deep pink, but Ridge, Finn, Steffy, and Katie all wore dark colors. This show about fashion needs something that resembles fashion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And the sad thing is... I would forgive all these horrible wardrobe choices... if the dialogue and story was good. But it isn't. It's bad. And when it's so bad... you start noticing all the other bad things. Ugh. What a cringe situation. 

Edited by Maxim
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • The transition from Neal to Adam was very abrupt, and to be honest my theory is that the character of Neal was designed so that we think he is super shady but then it turns out that he was on the side of good all along so Neal could have seamlessly become a hero of the BCPD with no need for Adam. I don't know whether Robert Lupone was hired on a short contract or if he was fired from a longer-term contract because they decided they wanted someone who was more of a leading man type, but I can imagine a scenario where Charles Grant did both the undercover Egyptian treasure/flirt with Victoria and the straighter-arrow day to day police investigation. But in my imagined scenario the MJ prostitution plotline probably doesn't exist and instead he probably continues a relationship with Victoria. The story seems very odd to me. I assume that David Canary would have been included only because a plotline where Steve is going to Finland in which only Rachel is seen in actual Finland seems unlikely. The synopses explicitly mention that Alice can't go with Steve but would whoever was playing Alice at that time have had the kind of clout to get the remote cancelled? It also strikes me as unlikely that production would have approved the expensive location shoot and *then* cancelled it only because of jealousy. It seems more likely that they rejected it because of the expense but then the jealousy part got added to the gossip speculatively, possibly because while it was being worked out they justified not including more castmembers because of the expense. 
    • My comment has nothing to do with cast resentment, but does relate to the Finland location shoot: It may be a coincidence, but Jim Matthews died in Finland in 1982.  Hugh Marlowe's final episode was in April 1982, but the character probably didn't die untll May or June. (I'm unable to find the character's date of death, only the date of Marlowe's final episode). SInce Jim and Rachel had very little interaction after around 1975, it is unlikely Jim's death in Finland had any connection to Rachel's potential visit, but the choice to have Jim die in that location at that time is a head-scratcher.  I'm sure the writers sent Jim on an extended trip (and off-screen) because of Marlowe's illness.  But Finland seems like a strange choice considering the (then) recently cancelled location shoot.  
    • I totally understand your sloths concern about it and I agree with you. Let’s hope the show plays it’s cards right.    Further comments about the last few episodes: - I liked that one of the attendees was filming the scene. That’s realistic. I wonder if the writers will follow up with that.  - Martin and Smitty trying to drag Leslie out was very heteronormative, so perfectly in line with them two as characters lol.    As for the future: it’s obvious the Duprees will come to accept Eva one way or another, but the rivalry with Kay should be here for the long term   On the topic of acting: the only bad actors I’m seeing are Ted and Derek. Tomas hasn’t proven to be either good or bad, so far, but he’s certainly mediocre and uncharismatic. He sucks the energy out of the scenes and I don’t see any couple of women ever vying for him. 
    • I’m trying to think which actors VW were working with at the time, and none of them had been there for a while. Even like Mac and Ada didn’t have that big of a part in Rachel’s storyline.  And Jamie was involved with all that movie stuff.
    • Brooke did ads before ATWT too. That probably helped get her the job. After ATWT she seemed to branch more into hosting, along with ads.  I think I saw Kelley in an ad or two, but you're right she wasn't on as much. 
    •   Thanks for sharing these. I wonder if Charles might have been in the running for Adam. I know Preacher was a bit of a bad boy at times on EON, but Neal seemed to be a step down, and Robert Lupone had played a similar part on AMC. Given the huge cast turnover at this point I wonder who thought they had been there long enough to go.  Laura Malone/Chris Rich would get a remote within the next year. 
    • Interesting.  It seems to allude to that statement that Warren Burton made around that time about some AW actors getting special treatment.  I wonder who was resentful about not getting to go. 
    • Good morning, boys!  I figured that it was time that our Gio was introduced into the hotness thread

      Please register in order to view this content

      @ranger1rg I even included a close up of his face for ya!
    • Under all of Madonna's social media today there is this wave of negative, toxic, absurd comments by Lady Gaga fans telling her how Gaga surpassed her in concert in Copacabana. I mean... Who the hell cares? Why are these fan communities so freaking toxic??? I'm sure Madonna doesn't care... But still. Have some respect for M. Leave her social media alone. Go cheer Gaga and be happy. Why come and spew hate on M??? Crazy world.
    • FYI, again, Ruth/Letitia is not in either of these 2 episodes. So that concludes the 4 episodes I had from Nov. 1983. I don't have the October episodes.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy