Jump to content

ARTICLE: Citing Decision to Rehire Steve Burton, Former ‘General Hospital’ Star Ingo Rademacher Submits New Evidence in Appeal to Lawsuit Against ABC - REPORT


Errol

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 39
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

Yeah but, in a way, why would she? Thinking back, we last saw him in Nixon Falls, so it's definitely been awhile. If the show had interest in him it would be easy for them to write it that soon when Joss is furious (if my theory proves true) Jax could try to talk her down. Instead, that will fall to Carly & to Trina. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I believe Burton said it was a two year deal, which for a vet with a decent salary is not short term in today’s soap world.

Ingo can kick rocks. He made choices and there were consequences. He had other work around his GH stints before, so no telling exactly why he is deemed unhirable now. Perhaps his outspoken MAGA personality made it difficult to find work in Hollywood. There are plenty of people that feel the way he does working in soaps and most of them keep it relatively quiet, especially compared to him. It’s his own fault he is now on stage with Kevin Sorbo, Scott Baio, etc, and not acting.

I think Jax can stay gone personally.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But, I hope you get my point that Ingo is not suing in order to be rehired.  He is suing for damages based on a conspiracy theory that GH brought back Steve Burton in order to argue against having to pay Ingo's future wages.  He is alleging that by hiring Burton, GH was trying to show that any actor who had been fired due to the immunization mandate could be rehired. This means that Ingo could not sue for damages based on future lost wages because there is still a slim chance that he could be hired by another production.

I don't agree with the conspiracy, but there are tidbits of truth that could imply some credibility.  However, given the recent court ruling that does not allow him to re-open the discovery process, we'll never know if it was a possibility.

To me, the paranoid subterfuge implied in Ingo's filing is more interesting than who should be cast on a soap that is already too bloated.

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But, it has been this way for years & they didn't capitulate earlier. Why would the Mouse company do so now? When I think about that as a possibility I cannot even imagine, given the size of Ingo's ego, it is substantially a chance that he would ...  I don't know ... maybe his head would explode!!! At any rate you wouldn't want to be in the vicinity.

Edited by Contessa Donatella
more
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • "And OMG, watching the scenes of Roger's return in comparison...the quality in the writing really nosedived. The stupid mask." Very much agreed.  Having Roger hide behind a mask for weeks/months, with it culminating with him swinging in on a vine at Blake/Phillip's wedding....geez.  So juvenile. IMO, Guiding Light never did a good job reintroducing major characters, either from the dead or elsewhere.  Masked balls = awful.  Amish = awful. When Reva was brought back from the dead, she should've just showed up in Springfield as Reva, and informed everyone that she had been gone for years because she felt like it.  She had a four-year fling with some dude who ended up dumping her due to disloyalty. Josh would be pissed and declare that their love is not *always* but *sometimes* and he'd act accordingly.  Her kids would hate her.   
    • Agreed. The Emmys next year are gonna be a pretty tough competition and I hope we get a Days sweep lol  Not only does Deidre deserve a nomination for these last few weeks, but I also think Paul Telfer, Raven Bowens, Carson Boatman, Dan Feuerriegel and Alison Sweeney have good chances as well.
    • It’s not about a lack of faith and trust in MVJ, it’s about a a lack of faith and trust in Ron Carlivati, who I think can be very sneaky and manipulative when he wants to be.  And, all that “He’s just a breakdown writer” talk never changed my mind about anything, because at Days, it was “just a breakdown writer” that gave us some of the worst episodes I’ve ever seen. 
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • @TaoboiI ran into Dani’s favorite party planner again tonight

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy