Jump to content

GH: November 2024 Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I would never call Stefan nothing! I just think they fundamentally mishandled Stefan/Laura once it came time to put it in action after the first year or two, and screwed him over heavily on all subsequent stories. I agree it's SN's best role. I had never seen Patch at the time so I had no idea just how good he was being someone utterly different. I still want Stefan back.

I don't think Ned and Alexis were unpopular per se. I do think Jax and Alexis was more popular at the time, but Riche wouldn't go for it.

I didn't dislike the idea of Sonny and Alexis on paper but the execution was dreadful (right down to Guza's returning team IIRC lampooning what JFP and McTavish's writing had done to Alexis as a ditz for Sonny in a fantasy sequence, before they took a turn wrecking her themselves the following year). I still would be down with Sonny and Alexis having a secret ONS/fling again after all these years, nothing too serious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

Nothing was probably a poor choice of words.  I just found Stefan's impact wasn't as great as it should have been and I don't agree with killing him off.  The show started by cutting the Bobbie/Stefan relationship and going with Kat/Stef instead.  Then the Laura stuff drug out forever (I know some of this was due to Genie's mat leave) and went back and forth with Nik's paternity.  Pairing him with Chloe in the end almost worked, but then the story got really strange.

I suppose in the end it was good the show never went with Jax/Alexis, but I did always like them.  It just seemed like a nice place to put Jax in after the long chaos with Brenda.

I think Sonny/Alexis worked better for Sonny to be honest.  It was nice to see him with an age appropriate woman for once that he actually seem to respect. You had to stretch Alexis's motivations more to make it believable for her.  I was never pining for any sort of reunion, it was always meant to be a fling, but I did think their ONS was pretty hot actually.  NLG and MB did have chemistry.

I think so. It's clear the focus has moved off the Cassadines, but could easily replace Valentin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

They are truly making Drew look like a scumbag. I can’t tell if we are supposed to secretly want him with Willow? The writing would seem to be going that direction at times. Then you have him in her living room, talking about her blushing and he looks like a predator whispering in her ear. And yes, Jason shouldn’t just attack people. But the balls on Drew to act like Carly should back him over Jason is wild. He’s seducing her son’s wife. This is Carly we are talking about here. 20 years ago she would be standing over his body holding a bloody knife or a smoking gun when the murder mystery kicked off.

We would need a credible Spencer recast established first. His whole thing was protecting the Prince and the legacy of the family, which would naturally have moved to Spencer as Nikolas has been such a disappointment. But if we had that, I could easily see a return to the family if they leaned back into their gothic roots. And his obsession over Laura would add some danger back into her life, which the character needs IMO. The foggy pier has been missed.

Edited by titan1978
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Like @carolineg I do think Stefan would work on the present canvas. Do I think he would have worked more on the strike team or Patrick Mulcahey? Hell yes. But Stefan would work on the canvas. And, unlike Valentin, is a Cassadine worth fearing. I hate the vasectomy that Valentin, as a character, got from concept to debut.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I do think bringing back Spencer or another Cassadine would be necessary for Stefan. But yes, I'd bring him back.

I do think they are potentially prepping Drew for a villain exit, though at this point with the potential Mulcahey gave him largely squandered I'd probably kill him in a murder mystery myself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well when you put it like that cuz...Val is easily replaceable.

 

But I guess I meant with these writers. Could they give Stefan the gravitas that he deserves?

Yeah, what a horrible turn he has taken and giving off the vibe of a total creeper.

 

I take it we are about to get a Who Killed Drew mystery then?

 

Mmmmm gothic roots.

Please register in order to view this content

 

 

I like all of this. But a Spencer recast comes with its own troubles at the moment. 

 

Yeah, I could see PM doing it justice. And the strike team whoever they may probably could, too. And yes, Stefan was not one to mess with. Val though...? Not so much.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

@TaoboiI don't know if this current writing team could do many past characters justice lol.  I would give Stefan a shot though if SN would come back.   Obviously SN is perfectly happy at Days and is needed on the canvas after losing Drake/John, so it's probably silly to even speculate.   I am sure the show could find a recast, but with Huss as Nik and a Spencer recast on the horizon I am not sure if I'd take the risk of recasting a third role.

I'll be honest I have a tough time believing MB's Valentin would have been scary either.  JPS and his piano and weepiness is decidedly not though.  Spinelli is more intimidating at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The next time DAYS knocks SN off contract (and they will) I'd grab him. But that's me. I'm surprised GH hasn't done it before, except I think SN may be on FV's shitlist for publicly criticizing the alleged plan to bring him back in 2013. IIRC he said he didn't care for the offer or potential story so he passed.

What I strongly suspect is that they intended to do what they always did back then and do only slightly less now: Nickel and dime SN by keeping him on recurring with a bunch of other returning vets, play him every 3-4 weeks in a subplot as a romantic spoiler for Luke and Laura (since Frank also wanted Genie on recurring at the time) and nothing else.

Edited by Vee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think Borlenghi had those darker features that would have worked as a Cassadine. And, at one point, it was suggested Vincent Irizarry had been recast in the role, replacing Borlenghi. Stuart, to me, was the Timothy Dalton of Valentin, except he lasted in the role unlike Dalton as James Bond. It's just.... bad casting and a mix bag of writing. Trying to make a character, who Helena was petrified of on her death bed, into a romantic lead wasn't the path that should have been taken.

Please register in order to view this content

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Not silly at all. The good news is that Stefan could be a force on the show because he still has so many connections. Like has been mentioned, it would definitely give Laura something to do. And with the Spencers resurgence, could you imagine Stefan stepping back into it all?

 

Would I love Stefan back if SN was free though...YES, PLEASE. I just currently don't trust the writers to do it too well. Them and the cursed blocked filming. Just look at how Jason's return and Lucky's return are going. I had even forgotten Lois was back until she popped up this past week. An uneven feeling has cropped up again. Now if PM was still there...

Edited by Taoboi
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

He'll most definitely be dropped by DAYS at some point; it's happened before, and it'll happen again. Surprised he got dropped 2018, honestly. We gotta find the interview he shittalked the return, lmao!!!

FOUND IT!

❝ Stephen on if there were any serious talks about bringing him back to GH to reprise his role as Stefan Cassadine: “If they were ever truly serious about bringing me back for a long-term story, then they would have made a serious offer. And there was none of that. They brought back all those great actors for the 50th anniversary Nurses Ball and they did call me for that. I said, ‘Are you kidding me?’ No, not for me. I felt slapped by that experience and I can’t believe that most of those actors went ahead with that plan. They are so talented and worth so much more than that.” ❞

⏤ Stephen Nichols Opens Up About His DAYS Return, "Patch" Finding Bo Brady & Why No Sign of Stefan Cassadine on GH!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's strange because I can see some logic (outside of looks) to cast JPS as Valentin based on some of his previous work.  He can be menacing.  But once you are crying all the time and performing Billy Joel at the Nurses Ball you can't take him seriously as someone to be feared.  Manipulative and conniving?  Sure.  A villain Helena was seriously concerned about?  Absolutely not.

Unless Peter Reckell commits to Days full time I don't see Steve being dropped.  There is a gaping hole that John leaves and unless they are planning to make Roman central again (by recasting back to Wayne again) the show needs that nostalgic hero.  Plus, the show needs one of their 80's supercouples and Patch/Kayla fit that bill.   Again this all depends on what Kristian and Peter decide to do in the end, but right now it seems short term for both.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I guess RTPP looked worse because it followed Another World, but it's a shame they didn't give it more time especially considering how the shows that were put on following it fared.
    • Please register in order to view this content

    • Durkin was awful. The writing did her no favors, but she was all wrong for the part, lacking the mix of mystery, steeliness, sorrow and hesitancy that defined Victoria. I still have the awful memory of Adam lugging her around like a rag doll. She looked much more like one of the Blue Whale dancing extras than Victoria. And her voice... Maybe I am too harsh. With that said, Curtis didn't seem as bothered. I see from a fan review mentioning Barnabas & Company that Durkin was asked to return for Victoria's final episodes and declined as she had a Christmas trip to Europe with her husband planned and wasn't interested in just a few appearances.  I refuse to believe Victoria actually died during the Leviathan storyline. If Barnabas and Angelique could come back 8 times, she could come back a few.
    • It's a shame she only appeared in three episodes for the purpose of being written out - I thought she was quite good in the little we saw. I liked her vibe better than Durkin that never seemed to quite capture Victoria as a character.
    • He did a lot of romance novel covers, so that might've just been enough for them to get their panties in a twist.
    • Pre-TGIF, ABC most successful 1980s Friday 8 pm comedy I'd say was Webster. Full House wasn't a hit its first two seasons but it started showing growth in its third season which overlapped with the launch of TGIF. Funny thing is, Full House became a Top 10 show with the 1991/92 move to Tuesday.
    • Oakland Tribune, 14 July 1985   AW is another show with Schenkel at helm By Connie Passalacqua For the most part, dictators of South American banana republics enjoy better reputations than executive producers of daytime soap operas. Total authority is vested in these producers, who can kill off a character (thus firing an actor) with a stroke of a pen, or completely change life in his or her soap opera dominion (both in its fictional locale and backstage at the studio) on any kind of whim.  Most rule despotically, inspiring fear in their actors and writers. Which inevitably surfaces on the screen and subtracts from a show's quality. Then there's Stephen Schenkel who became executive producer of Another World last fall. He's been described by one of his actresses as "a teddy bear." He has noticeably improved the show, mostly because his natural warmth encourages backstage cohesiveness, and he believes in personally nurturing his staff and cast. 'I like to be supportive', he said.' I like to generate a certain amount of enthusiasm. I love actors and writers and technical people. And I like to laugh..  ' Schenkel said that most of the factors that have led to the shows improved ratings existed before he took over. There were well defined characters, outstanding writers and excellent production values, he explains. 'These things were in place but needed to be stimulated. There wasn't a lot of excitement. What really was missing was an adequate story. We added Gillian Spencer as a writer. (she also plays Daisy on All My Children), who's wonderful, and it just coalesced. The writers energy and commitment to the show began to give it an emotional intensity and some real passion within the characters." Schenkel, a former ABC programming executive who helped develop Ryan's Hope, is a strong believer in stressing romantic and comedy elements in soap operas. AW is also one of the only soaps with an established group of comic characters, including Wallingford (Brent Collins) and Lily Mason (Jackee , Harry). Schenkel raves about the talents of all his actors, and even has something good to say about the Brooklyn location of the shows studio, which most of his Manhattan-oriented staff loathe. I like the people here. I like to walk down the street and feel their energies, he said. He also violateda soap opera no-no, ' inviting actors and writers to the same party. "Everyone got to know one another, he said. And I didn't get any complaints about actors ' begging for story lines, he said. 
    • Since it's pride month.

      Please register in order to view this content

         
    • National City Star-News, 5 May 1977 TV topics by Peter Blazi Lear’s ‘All that Glitters’—doesn’t The best thing that can be said about Norman Lear’s newest soap opera“All That Glitters” is that it comes on so late at night most people will miss it. Role reversal is supposed to be the big draw, with women the breadwinners, mainly executives of a huge conglomerate. The men either fuss with the housework or fidget at the office as secretaries to their bawdy bosses. A female fantasyland? I doubt it. While the role reversal idea has some possibilities, the show pushes too hard for laughs and winds up with raucous females and effete males. A confident, independent woman is indeed a sight to behold and attract, but femininity need not be sacrificed. Unlike Lear’s “Mary Hartman, Mary Hartman,” "Glitters” doesn’t, but you’ve got to give him credit for trying. Today’s experimental comedy is what tomorrow’s hits are made of. Better luck next time, Norman. (“All That Glitters” can be seen weekday evenings at 11 p.m. on Channel 6.) .
    • Actually Kim Zimmer got six weeks off to test the waters for pilot season in L.A. - she said later she went on many auditions and got one offer for a sitcom, but she would one of many in an ensemble. She turned it down, because it wasn't worth leaving Guiding Light for a supporting role on a sitcom. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy