Jump to content

Fire Island on Hulu


Faulkner

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 28
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

I remember Matt Rogers getting mad because of a silly  kiss between  John  Krasinski and Pete Davidson  on SNL.  It's odd he got so upset over that when this is the second project he's involved in to be heavily criticized for stereotypes and pandering and not caring about real representation. (the other was that Q-Force cartoon)

I admire Bowen Yang, he had a tough life to get where he is now, but, while he is very charismatic, he relies so much on camp cliche to the point where I don't really invest. It's telling that he loves Gays in Space, to me one of the worst SNL sketches and one which mainly relied on straight actors mincing and lisping as  viewers cheered the whole laugh-at-the-queers element. 

I also was not comfortable with how some involved with the movie dogpiled some woman on Twitter who made a stupid tweet about the  film. If your film is good enough you shouldn't have to be so desperate for clout.

Anyway, I will try it sometime, but as with Palm Springs, I may be better off just staying with the trailer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

For the movie, I didn't mind it. There were parts that were cute, but I also kind of feel like there were too many characters all scrammed into one. It was difficult for me to follow on who was who. However, I did like how the movie kept up with current issues in the LGBTQ community (e.g., Only Fans, racial stigma, drug/substance use). There were a couple of scenes that kind of fell flat, but I enjoyed the diversity of the cast. As far as the characters:

  • Noah: I completely understood his character and where he was coming from.
  • Howie: I think I understood his insecurities, but the movie was so focused on Noah that made Howie step into the shadow.
  • Will: OMG. He reminds me of a friend of mine Mike. His physique, bone structure, and voice were spot on like Mike's. Does Will go to raves? Hahaha! Mike and I did that all the time. I liked the dynamic between Noah and Will and it left you feeling like something could develop between the two? I liked Will. His layers peeled off throughout the movie and I enjoyed witnessing that.
  • Charlie: Poorly executed. His character could have been written better. I mean, a LOT better. The only thing I remember about him is Lyme Disease.
  • Cooper: Regina George from Mean Girls. I didn't understand his character until the bathroom scene with Noah. But, I couldn't figure out as to why he kept interrupting Noah/Will but didn't he interrupt Howie and Charlie too? I thought his reasonings were mainly because he thought Noah and his friends were nothing but trash.
  • Erin: She was cute and I know she wasn't written to be a degenerative type or anything, but you're as young as you feel. I get that she's older and has more life experiences, but I wish she was around more instead of hosting a party, cooking food, or passing a note from Will to Noah.
  • Luke, Keegan, and Max: Want to talk about a waste of time? These three. Enough said.

All in all, it wasn't bad. Too much scramming to fit into one movie in my opinion. But, I did like how they kept up with current issues and there were some really funny moments. On the other hand, if they trimmed the cast, I probably would have liked it a lot better. Conrad Ricamora? I like this guy. I want to see more of his talent for sure. 

Please register in order to view this content

Edited by Noel
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

His thighs during the dance-off hosted by Peppermint. It’s funny that Conrad Ricamora is a full decade older than most of the cast (43). I will say that Conrad is almost too good at playing the Darcy. I didn’t really buy Noah’s interest in him. And they lacked heat as a couple.

I agree with your assessment in general. The movie is fine if you like this sort of light brainless comedy, and it didn’t shy away from the many of the realities of gay single life (the drugs, etc.) to appeal to respectability politics. However, I have no desire to rewatch it. It just feels sort of thin, most of the characters didn’t pop, and most of the actors weren’t charismatic or distinguished enough to make much of an impression. Some of the Noah/Howie dynamic had an interesting nuance, I guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I thought Will/Noah had some potential and I'm glad that there wasn't this "insta-pairing" like Days of Our Lives like Decaf Taster's Choice. But, god damn. They were always getting interrupted, lol! Yeah, I really like Conrad Ricamora. OMG. He so reminds me of my friend Mike except Mike was straight, but we didn't look at sexuality and how sexuality should define who we are as human beings. In fact, one's sexual orientation, creed, gender, ethnicity, class, etc. is only a small part of who we are as we're all made up into many things collectively as we're all a part of the human race. I miss my Mikey! I want to see more of Conrad Ricamora so bad! 

Please register in order to view this content

Edited by Noel
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Members

So I finally got to watch this and I gotta say, I really liked it. Fluffy? Yes. Was the voice-over a bit too much at some unnecessary moments? Yes, but that exposition plays better for a general audience sometimes. It's not gonna win an Oscar. But I really liked Joel Kim Booster and Bowen Yang, and Conrad Ricamora was giving some serious smoldering energy I'd never seen him put out from his overly broad 'nerd' role on How to Get Away with Murder - he was channeling Benedict Cumberbatch, Harrison Ford in Working Girl, you name it, to say nothing of Colin Firth. It was a cute Austen adaptation in a gay universe and that will play really well for young people going forward, and that's important. I know Andrew Ahn did the well-received Spa Night which I have yet to see, but now I want to.

I consume so much queer cinema and media that is either coded in a variety of ways, using a lot of gritty genre trappings or whatever else, and that's my own choice. I watch a lot of weird queer shít from all over the world too. But sometimes you just want to see an American-made, sweet gay romantic comedy with a degree of artistry along with humor and heartfelt performances. They're still pretty rare over here without looking like they were made for a grand tops. This gave me that and it was well-made, so I didn't find it as disposable as I expected. It's not the comic equivalent of, say, Bridesmaids, but the emotional content got me in the same way. There's stuff a lot of us can relate to, especially as we get older or don't fit into this or that ethnic or abled or body type. I was pleased with it. A solid, sweet piece of work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thank you for sharing that. I wish I enjoyed it more, but it wasn’t as dire as I was expecting. A lot of times we hold films that represent “us” (whatever that may be) to a higher standard. It was never gonna be some revelatory work like, say, Wong Kar Wai’s Happy Together, which was such a milestone for Asian gay men on film (and one of my favorite movies). But I wish Fire Island were about 50-60 percent funnier. (Plus the treatment of the black characters worked my nerves.)

I liked Conrad a lot, and his performance here hints at potential (and sex appeal) I hadn’t really seen from him before. An actor like him may not have had many opportunities to show his stuff in years past. He’d almost certainly been relegated to roles as a glorified extra or two lines as a computer hacker in some CBS procedural. 

Edited by Faulkner
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

He played a glorified version of the latter on HTGAWM after a certain point, IMO. His character there was often too broad and weak for me, but I also tuned out on that show after Season 3 when they pinned literally everything on one of the students' fathers or something. I'll finish it at some point because I loved Viola Davis' performance and some of the others like Liza Weil, and loved looking at Matt McGorry and Jack Falahee. Anyway, that's way off.

I thought Fire Island was a lot funnier than I've frankly come to expect from a lot of supposedly groundbreaking LGBT comedy especially. It could've been a bit sharper, sure. And no, nothing is on par with Happy Together. I do think it could've done more with the Black friend, but I did like that the white guy in the group was relegated to a minor role as well, and I can't fault them for centering the AAPL experience.

Edited by Vee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Or Megan is shot by mobsters as retaliation for Dave's unpaid gambling debts.
    • Finland seemed such an odd choice for a location shoot. ATWT went to Greece and later Spain while GL had Tenerife and there were others in that timeframe. But Finland not being a known tourist destination or offering the tropical/sunny atmosphere usually associated with location shoots seems off brand. Maybe they were negotiating a deal with a tourist association and it fell through.
    • I was talking about 1986, but the glimpses of 1982 are about the same. 
    • I skimmed some of the 1982 synopses; Steve was planning on an opening an office in Finland, and I think Jim went there as part of the preparation. That probably was a big issue; AW had already gone to San Diego that year, with Rachel/Steve/Mitch. And to upstate NY with Pete and Diana. I wonder if upstate was as expensive lol  AW in 1982 has always fascinated me, because of how messy it was 
    • That makes sense. What a messy time for the show. And any changes they made were mostly for the worse.
    • The transition from Neal to Adam was very abrupt, and to be honest my theory is that the character of Neal was designed so that we think he is super shady but then it turns out that he was on the side of good all along so Neal could have seamlessly become a hero of the BCPD with no need for Adam. I don't know whether Robert Lupone was hired on a short contract or if he was fired from a longer-term contract because they decided they wanted someone who was more of a leading man type, but I can imagine a scenario where Charles Grant did both the undercover Egyptian treasure/flirt with Victoria and the straighter-arrow day to day police investigation. But in my imagined scenario the MJ prostitution plotline probably doesn't exist and instead he probably continues a relationship with Victoria. The story seems very odd to me. I assume that David Canary would have been included only because a plotline where Steve is going to Finland in which only Rachel is seen in actual Finland seems unlikely. The synopses explicitly mention that Alice can't go with Steve but would whoever was playing Alice at that time have had the kind of clout to get the remote cancelled? It also strikes me as unlikely that production would have approved the expensive location shoot and *then* cancelled it only because of jealousy. It seems more likely that they rejected it because of the expense but then the jealousy part got added to the gossip speculatively, possibly because while it was being worked out they justified not including more castmembers because of the expense. 
    • My comment has nothing to do with cast resentment, but does relate to the Finland location shoot: It may be a coincidence, but Jim Matthews died in Finland in 1982.  Hugh Marlowe's final episode was in April 1982, but the character probably didn't die untll May or June. (I'm unable to find the character's date of death, only the date of Marlowe's final episode). SInce Jim and Rachel had very little interaction after around 1975, it is unlikely Jim's death in Finland had any connection to Rachel's potential visit, but the choice to have Jim die in that location at that time is a head-scratcher.  I'm sure the writers sent Jim on an extended trip (and off-screen) because of Marlowe's illness.  But Finland seems like a strange choice considering the (then) recently cancelled location shoot.  
    • I totally understand your sloths concern about it and I agree with you. Let’s hope the show plays it’s cards right.    Further comments about the last few episodes: - I liked that one of the attendees was filming the scene. That’s realistic. I wonder if the writers will follow up with that.  - Martin and Smitty trying to drag Leslie out was very heteronormative, so perfectly in line with them two as characters lol.    As for the future: it’s obvious the Duprees will come to accept Eva one way or another, but the rivalry with Kay should be here for the long term   On the topic of acting: the only bad actors I’m seeing are Ted and Derek. Tomas hasn’t proven to be either good or bad, so far, but he’s certainly mediocre and uncharismatic. He sucks the energy out of the scenes and I don’t see any couple of women ever vying for him. 
    • I’m trying to think which actors VW were working with at the time, and none of them had been there for a while. Even like Mac and Ada didn’t have that big of a part in Rachel’s storyline.  And Jamie was involved with all that movie stuff.
    • Brooke did ads before ATWT too. That probably helped get her the job. After ATWT she seemed to branch more into hosting, along with ads.  I think I saw Kelley in an ad or two, but you're right she wasn't on as much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy