Jump to content

Favorite soap archetype


Recommended Posts

  • Members

From the matriarch and patriarch thread- what are some of your favorite characters that embody these formerly common soap characters archetypes?  Also any others that were missed in @Neil Johnson’s post in that thread?  I decided to add wrong side

of the tracks character, and redeemed bad girl.

 

I’m looking for your favorite, not an idea of the best or first or model.  Which is yours favorite and why?

 

Matriarch- Alice Horton DAYS

I just loved Alice.  She was feisty, involved without nagging, loving, and welcoming.

 

Patriarch- Dr. Steve Hardy GH

Not a traditional soap, the family home was the hospital.  And Steve was the rock, the steady foundation.


Wise older character- Ruby Anderson GH

Again, not a traditional soap.  But Ruby really was a loving safe place, especially for the younger characters in town.  She wasn’t a pushover, she was tough love and could relate to everyone because of her past.

 

Ingenue- Laura Webber GH

Even when she was younger and wasn’t always an innocent, she had such an emotional innocence about her.  Heart on her sleeve always.

 

Prince Charming- Phillip Spaulding GL

For the most part trying to be the best of his family.


Long term bad-girl- Tracy Quartermaine GH

Although kind of defanged in later years, at her core she acted always in her own

interest.

 

Redeemed bad girl- Brenda Barrett GH

I had watched GH since I was a kid thanks to my family, but I was a young teen when the Karen/Brenda/Jagger/Jason stuff started, and I was really hooked then!  Brenda wasn’t as bad as some bad girls, but she was selfish, manipulative, mean, sexual, and also vulnerable and needy and lonely.


Long term realistic villain- Roger Thorpe GL

Hall of mirrors was over the top, but most of his time doing evil and selfish deeds was realistic, and compelling.

 

Larger than life supervillain- James Stenbeck ATWT

For all the love I have for Stefano, James still seemed dangerous when Stefano seemed like a cartoon.

 

Meddling character- Phoebe Wallingford AMC

Did anyone wring their hands more or have more fun meddling than Phoebe?

 

Wrong side of the tracks- Nina Webster Y&R

Nina was such a great, grounded character.  And she is almost a double archetype- wrong side of the tracks that marries into the wealthy family in town!

 

My personal favorite archetype is the wrong side of the tracks character.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 2
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Yikes! With so many decades of soap watching under my belt, narrowing down the choices will be a challenge!

 

I’m looking for your favorite, not an idea of the best or first or model.  Which is yours favorite and why?

 

Matriarch- Bert Bauer, The Guiding Light

 

Patriarch- Dr. Tom Horton, Days of Our Lives


Wise older character- Jessie Brewer, General Hospital

 

Ingenue- Alice Matthews, Another World

 

Prince Charming- Scotty Baldwin, General Hospital


Long term bad-girl- Lisa Miller, As the World Turns

 

Redeemed bad girl- Lorie Brooks, The Young and the Restless


Long term realistic villain- Roger Thorpe, TGL

 

Larger than life supervillain- Those characters turn me off

 

Meddling character- Aunt Liz Matthews, Another World

 

Wrong side of the tracks- Rachel Davis, Another World

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Manuela Soares 'The Soap Opera Book' published mid 70's listed these archetypes. Many of them have vanished as soaps changed focus. What would today's list consist of?

 

1. Young and vulnerable romantic heroine (strong in feelings, indecisive in actions) eg Liza SFT, Carol ATWT, Trish DOOL,Leslie Y&R

 

2 Old fashioned villian (selfish, scheming, liars, blackmailers) Author noted these seemed to be a dying breed Cam GH, Willis AW, Roger RH, Dorian OLTL

 

3.The rival (usually manipulating the heroine in pursuit of her man) Iris AW, Jennifer SFT, Erica AMC, Olive AW

 

4. Suffering antagonist (general troublemakers)  Delia RH, Susan ATWT, Stacy TD

 

5. Mr Right (stable, professional) Mike GL, Linc AMC, Bob ATWT

 

6. Former playboy (mysterious, reformed?) Steve AW, Doug DOOL, Lance Y&R

 

7. Meddlesome/villianous mother/grandmother (destructive, rich, snobbish, powerful) Pheobe AMC, Liz AW, Meg LOL

 

8. Benevolent mother/grandmother (tolerant, non-interfering, optimistic) Bert GL, Kate AMC, Jessie GH, Maeve RH

 

9.Career woman (strong willed yet vulnerable, feminine can be sympathetic or not) Laura DOOL, Althea TD, Sara GL, Susan ATWT, Nancy EON

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I found it to be a rather odd way to deal with a character departing for parts unknown.
    • Today reminded me as to why I’m a little disappointed in the name that the new Pope chose

      Please register in order to view this content

      Luckily, EJ and Johnny, and pretty much every other character saved today’s episode.  I didn’t expect Javi to be the one to save Sarah though, and I don’t mind it at all, because if it means that Javi is finally going to get his own identity/character, away from his douchy bf, I’m all for it. Javi’s scenes would’ve been a lot better had it not been for him. EJ and Johnny were the best part of today. Their conversation hit a lot of important beats and I’m so looking forward to seeing them play out. And now that EJ knows that Johnny is going to work for Xander, that opens up another dynamic to their storyline and to the Kiriakis family storylines as well. Tying them all together could be really good. There are so many story possibilities that can come out of this. And I thought Carson Boatman did a pretty good job again too.  I also liked that Johnny was there to comfort Chanel after everything that happened with Sarah. They’re so good together. But I do have mixed feelings about Chanel possibly forgiving Johnny so quickly. Hopefully, the question that she asked him at the end of today leads to more conflict for the two of them.  And yeah, still no changes in Alex’s character lol 
    • Awesome, thanks so much for taking the time to grab this episode. I had a quick review of your rip because I was curious why it was 700MB and 30 minutes. The first 10 minutes of the episode is 3169 (opening credits at 5 minutes and again at 15 minutes). I thought we had the full HD version of ep.3170 on the YouTube channel, but it appears they added the wrong episode but labelled it 3170. 
    • I guess, according to Mike Manning in the Michael Fairman chat, he was almost Derek 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • OIC Thanks. I saw thzt & looked for a prior  ... never mind. 
    • I imagine Brad will blow through all the money in a year and come crawling back, just as Portia warned him not to.
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • That's a name I haven't heard in a minute. Thanks! 
    • Well, since I'm still up unexpected past my growing-into-it bedtime. lol.   I finally got to rewatch Monday's. I even rewatched Friday's to take it all in. Now that we got the reveal and hit the climax of the SilkPress Sheila storyline, now we get to watch the aftermath and/or turns that come with its climax. So far, so good. Friday left us with three cliffhangers. And what I found surprising was how I felt about them over a rewatch.    I know some of you all felt a way about the dialogue during Kat vs Eva. I remember liking it more the first time around and it was nice for them to have these scenes to establish more of a frenemy vibe for them going forward. That still held up. But I found myself agreeing with you all about that dialogue. lol. Still, it was nice to have both of their POVs.   Second up was Silk Press Sheila vs the Duprees. And I was happy to get a brief spat with Dani in there. But the rest standouts for me was Anita and Martin. Haters can hate and given the tail end of the episode, I will agree to a fault, but Brandon has impressed and he was on fire on Monday and had great subtle work on Friday. And that subtle work made it all the better. Like I believe I said when I was watching...BC has a much better grip on his character and seems to be realizing what his tics are so has started to be able to know when to turn it up and when to dial it down. And for the most part (emphasis on most), he got that. Meanwhile, TT was giving fierceness, and I was here for every minute of it. Her reading SilkPress. Her being quip about it. Her 'BE STILL.' Ooooo she had a chokehold on me as Anita gave what I was expecting her to SilkPress. WORTH THE WAIT. I also loved Vernon's CHOOSE SILENCE. I wonder though if SilkPress will figure out Martin's condition from her observing Anita and Vernon with him.   And speaking of worth it...Oooo YES Nicole vs Ted was worth totally worth it. Oooooo I knew DD would nail it, and it was all so well done. The fight between the part of Nicole who is a therapist vs Nicole as a woman who wants to express how she feels. And being so angry. And how there would be moments when it would shoot out of her. And how she would restrain herself. But how she felt she should not be restrain. Just the levels of processing and layers. And DD played it all so well. I do wish Maurice gave just a little bit more, but overall, I thought he did a good job even if it was just Ted coming across as a deadbeat and not at all redeemable. And Kat being there for her mother was so beautiful.   Minority, but I love the montage though yes, it did run a little long. Given how the Duprees like to bond (and also as I mentioned from my own very recent family experiences), it did not seem out of place to me.     That said...let's see how the aftermath worked in today's episode. Overall. Cuz RC can be hit or miss. 
    • I wonder whose brilliant (

      Please register in order to view this content

      ) idea it was to do an almost complete rip-off of the "who killed Tom King"-storyline. That's some quality style writing right there.....  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy