Jump to content

The Media/Journalism Thread


Faulkner

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Yes,  definitely and I would say the same of that town where that Yemeni mayor of the Michigan town has endorsed TFg. There is a serious split there as other Muslims who reside there, who are originally from nations like Bangladesh and other nations vehemently oppose this mayor’s endorsement and it may very well cost him his position in the end as he has angered many, not just other Muslim residents who balk at endorsing a candidate with such anti immigrant and anti Muslim rhetoric. 

Apparently, the chaos at the L.A. Times has been going on for several months with the executive editor resigning in January of this year. That’s a lot of turbulence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 3.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

I think Harris was very good in the 60 Minutes clip I posted in the PT, but I am surprised how Norah O'Donnell kept doubling down over and over on insisting Harris offer more abortion restrictions. WTF? The YouTube comments and social media feeds are roasting her on that too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

We've spoken before that the press's need to argue "both sides" is a misguided effort to appear unbiased.  I actually thought Anderson Cooper had a good response to this while discussing Charlemagne's critique of CNN.  He said his job is not to argue with politicians, but to get them to espouse their opinions in order to expose their hypocrisy to the public.   Which is the opposite of what Nora O'Donnell did.

However, the argument for abortion restrictions are inherently illogical.  Firstly, states like Florida are saying that abortion is OK under certain circumstances, which would never appease religious conservatives.  Secondly, restrictions should be overseen by the American Medical Association.  For example, there is no federal law prohibiting breast enhancement for minors, because it is unnecessary due to the fact that it against the ethics principles of the AMA.  Third, we all know this is a smoke screen to create a precedence to evade other civil rights.

I get annoyed that the political argument stops at Tim Walz's stance on privacy.  I think they should use similar rhetoric to the immigration policy and ask how would these federal laws be enforced.  Would they want to arrest the mother or the doctor?  If the doctor is found innocent, they can go back to practice.  But, if there was an ethical concern that was handled by the AMA, that is a lower threshold would inhibit the ability to practice, because those found to be unethical cannot be insured.  And finally, why does the federal government have more of an interest in regulating medicine than other professions?

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I read on X (formerly Twitter), that Tucker Carlson's entrance music at MSG for the Trump event was "Son of a Preacherman."  Which is ironic on a number of levels.  Firstly, it was sung by Dusty Springfield, a lesbian who would have hated Tucker and Trump.  Second, he's the son of a newspaper man (and the adopted son of a Swanson's Frozen Food Heir).  Third, much like Trump's VP pick, he made his mark in the media initially as an anti-Trumper, but later found that MAGA are the only ones who will pay his bills.

If it all wasn't so tragic, it would be funny.

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

To their credit, the media with the exception of USA Today and Fox have been full throated in calling the MSG Trump rally what it was: A racist sideshow.

In other news, more of this is happening at the Post. Per Dana Milbank, of all people:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Jason, just let me say that it was not my intent to any way impugn any of your data  or research. I'm very sorry if it came out that way. Obviously the person I got these 4 November episodes from has mislabeled files, multiples, which I was certainly unaware of.  When I am editing it is all about what I see & hear. Later, I find time for greater reflection.  Of course, I was suspicious from the very first instance where what I saw & heard did not agree with what it should have.  I'm very glad to know why.  If you find you are no longer interested in the edit, that is fine. I have no ego in this. I did it only to share it.
    • I feel like Vernon and Anita need to not be hypocrites and try and take the heat off Bill in this case. It's clear that the family used him as a fixer and especially knowing he helped with Martin's situation, they need to either be quiet or support him. BTW...with Vanessa being in the hospital for food poisoning, am I the only one who thought Shanice was gonna say she's pregnant or had an STD? The only reason I say STD is because she hasn't had any memorable sex partners, but I definitely don't believe she just had food poisoning.
    • Yeah, I mean I know that the name still pertains. I just laugh at it not now being called Arizona Dust, but, I admit it simply does not have the same ring to it. Above, that is interesting that Arizona had already come up before the crisis. 
    • Leslie and her family are from Chicago? Anita's background also includes being a former Chi-Town native? Might they connect this and go somewhere with it?
    • Honestly who's to say Leslie even birthed Eva, I mean she's a liar, I wouldn't believe a word she says about Eva being Ted's(or hers)
    •   1. 11/1/83 cast/set list:  

      Please register in order to view this content

          The "11/2/83" video you posted of Ruth Buzzi's scenes includes Roman and Hope in them, meaning the video you posted is actually 11/1/83, since Roman and Hope aren't in 11/2/83.   2. The video you posted of "11/2/83" has scenes with Roman and Hope. As you can see from my cast/set list, Roman and Hope are not in the 11/2/83 episode (see above note):   4573...11/2/83: Cast: Mickey, Julie, Doug, Maggie, Neil, Don, Marie, Alex, Liz, Andre as Tony, Gwen, Chris, Eugene, Sandy, Letitia, Charlene, Mrs. Whiting, Wanda/Guard, Dave, Delia, Saleslady # 1, Saleslady # 2, Figure in Dark, Raven/animal, Cats/animals, Birds/animals.   2.  11/3/83 :My video collection starts with 11/4/83. so I don't have the 11/1/83 or 11/3/83 video, but in addition to the cast/set list for 11/3/83, here is also the parking clearance call sheet for that day, showing Ruth was not only in the cast/set list but did work that day:     They even had hired the animal trainer and all the animals for the day, so It's sort of a certainty that her scenes were not cut that day, or it would have been a big waste of the budget. 3. As for 11/7/83, I just fast-forwarded through that whole episode myself. Letitia is in it from start to finish. It's her big final episode where she is killed. She starts the episode saying "Eugene, are you there?" In the next act, Marlena shows up and meets Letitia's lion. Later in the episode, Letitia is killed by "Eugene" (the Salem Slasher in a Eugene mask).   So, as we can see from your own post, the 11/2/83 date you have listed on that video is incorrect, since Hope and Roman are in that video but not in the 11/2/83 episode.It seems the dates you have on all your early November 1983 episodes are incorrect.   When you post videos and suggest that my data is incorrect, do you not first compare who is in the scenes and see if that matches who is in the episode? You didn't do that with the "11/2/83" episode, which based on Roman and Hope being in it means that is actually 11/1/83. Best to do something like that first before suggesting my data and research is incorrect.
    • Within the Dupree family, I predict Vernon/Anita will be conflicted about what to do about Bill and his role in the whole Ted/Silk Press Sheila situation... especially since Bill knows where the particular bone about Martin is buried. Dani, Chelsea, and Naomi's reactions to what Bill possibly did isn't hard to guess.. but Hayley's reactions will be interesting to hear.  Especially given her recent pregnancy scare.. she might not be so much on Bill's side, or she'll totally surprise us and be totally on Bill's side.   Either way, I think Martin's secret will be the main focus in May sweeps.. with the fall out of the Eva secret playing out in the background... while the Joey/Vanessa/Doug thing continues to boil/develop.
    • Hotel was The Love Boat on land but a little soapier. I will forever maintain that Hotel was a time slot hit. I don't believe that 1983/84 Hotel was a better show than Knots Landing.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy