Jump to content

Gone Girl


dm.

Recommended Posts

  • Members

tumblr_nggi47hV9k1qaho1po5_250.gif

GONE GIRL
A wife goes missing and her husband is the main suspect in her mysterious disappearance.

What did you think of the movie? I've personally loved it. Was going to read the book, but my cousin took me to see it at the movies, and now I'm not sure I'll make time to read the book, lol.

Loved Rosamund Pike as the main character!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 11
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

The movie stuck pretty close to the book and I loved them both. There was only one minor character I can recall who wasn't in the movie. What made the book interesting was that Amy's diary entries were every other chapter, so you had her version of events interlaced with Nick's, but once you know the shocking twist midway through the book might not be as fun to read.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I've seen it 3 times. That sh!t stays with you. Definitely my favorite movie of the year; it was just spectacular. WHEN THE STORY SUDDENLY TURNED I DIED AND CAME BACK

My absolute favorite thing about it though was the score. Perfection. I'm so grateful they made it available for purchase. I listen to it all day.

Please register in order to view this content


"I am so much happier now that I'm dead.

Technically, "missing."

Soon to be presumed dead.

Gone."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrator

I so wanted Amy to get her comeuppance!!! I can't believe she got away with it. Nonetheless, I really liked the movie. Poor Nick and poor Neil Patrick Harris (what a death scene! My jaw dropped at all that blood on Amy). Rosamund Pike was so good in this role and can see why she's nominated for all these awards.

What was different from the book? You can put it in spoiler tags in case someone wants to read the book.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I finally got around to watching this. It thought it was a nice bit of noir. Obviously it was filled with a million plot holes but this is one of those movie where you have to decide that you are going to go along with it or not watch at all. It's not meant to be realistic, it's meant to be a dark, twisty sort of urban legend. ("Once back in 2012 there was a guy named Nick Dunne who was accused of muuuuuurder....").

The performances were great. Rosamund Pike was wonderful. One minute she's Meg Ryan in "When Harry Met Sally", the next she's Barbara Stanwyck in "Double Indemnity" and for some reason Ben Affleck excels at roles like this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm not sure I exactly see what you mean here. I didn't feel like I had to make myself go along with it otherwise it wouldn't hold ground at all.

That is very true. Pike was phenomenal in the role. And Affleck excelled at this role because it called for him to be exactly like he appears in real life: Arrogant and smug. :lol: I'm not saying he truly is (I wouldn't know) but that's how he often comes across in many of his roles and it was a perfect fit for this character.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But it actually doesn't hold ground at all. There's a whole thread devoted to plot holes on IMDB. The biggest mainly concern everything that happened at the lake house and after. (I'm not going to go into detail for those who still haven't watched.) There are just too many ways Amy couldn't have accomplished what she did. It was easier to hand wave in the book but seeing it play out on screen really highlighted how improbable it all was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah, that's always the advantage of books over movies. I'm never sure if it's better to read the book before or after seeing a movie made from it. Purposefully or not, memories of the book always fill in the weak holes in the plot so I wonder what it would've been like to see this film unspoiled. Still I really enjoyed it. I was curious how they would show the diary version of things and I thought it was very skillfully done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Days of our Lives S60E204 – Thursday, June 5, 2025 Okay, today’s episode was kind of boring. It was nice seeing Jack and Jen back, but they wasted an entire episode on Jen chatting with Julie - one scene would’ve been enough. Also, why didn’t Jack and Jen go comfort Marlena? And wouldn’t a flashback with Jack, Jen, and John have been great? Maybe something from the Cruise of Deception era? Bottom line - it feels like once John’s memorial is over and the returning fan favorites leave Salem… the show’s going to be dull again.
    • Everything with Elon and Trump is a stunt. If people, and the sycophantic press, are talking about their "feud," they are not talking about Republican plans to gut Medicare, Medicaid, and the ACA. 
    • I can't fully remember, but I don't think they tried to get Beth Chamberlin back. I think Laibson/McTavish likely saw Beth as old news and wanted to move Philip on; either that or have her return only when Philip was closely tied to a new woman. Thanks as always for these recaps. I think I had stopped watching around this time and mostly kept up by reading in the soap magazines. Bridget's degradation was horrible to watch, as the character had grown so much over the years and was clearly regressed just to be a foil for a "hot" couple viewers had zero investment in. 
    • Having the majority of the cast on those low numbers is no way to tell story. And just 2 dayplayers for the month. So sad for the #1 soap.  
    • I believe it was. And this is actually one of the cases where I wouldn’t mind some dumb soap opera bringing back from the dead. They gave Mishael, Amanda, with all of Hilary’s connections but none of the personality except for fleeting moments. Hilary absolutely should’ve just left town. They decided to kill her and the baby. Just baffling,
    • That was Mal Young right? He thought a tragic death was a better option than crafting a story where Hilary leaves town. Was it a case of punishing someone who wants to leave? And then they have to jump through hoops to bring the actress back.
    • Ooo @TaoboiI will say I just watched Amanda give it to Abby and I loved it. Honestly just made me miss Hilary more. I will never understand or get over that decision to kill her off. Also call me crazy but I could definitely see the Damian actor playing NuTed on BTG. Very much still enjoying the Lily attraction.
    • I rewatched these episodes---they broke my heart. Somehow, Nola had seen Vanessa leave the hospital, and follows her home, and Maeve just lets out this primal scream---chills went down my spine. And knowing the history between them---never quite liking the other and always getting on each other's nerves (to put it mildly)---makes it a much richer to have them put it all aside in the moment and be family to each other. I've never seen/heard what Maeve thought of the story itself, but she did want a break, so it's not like she was fired and then brought back. Yes, Vanessa could be this stubborn and unwilling to ask for help. She'd pretty much always been an "I can do this on my own" type of woman, although when she first came to town, she would still run to Henry. But after she met Billy, she stopped relying on her father. It's part of the reason she (briefly) got addicted to pills after Bill's birth---she was determined to take care of him all by herself and became obsessed with the idea she was the only one who could. Of course, nothing before to this extreme. I should say, there's no way (IMO) they could've told this story---Vanessa letting her loved ones thinking she'd died---if her father Henry had still been alive. She never would've been able to do that to him. And it does chafe that she's letting Bill believe it, when her mantra had been all about protecting him since the day he was born. I honestly don't recall what I thought about it at the time. But now I'm thrilled she's free of Matt at least. LOL.
    • I had no idea Peter Reckell was 70. He doesn’t look or feel it and I guess I thought Bo and Hope were closer in age than 9 years. Wow even the new writers had to have Jack praise Leo. Melissa Reeves continues to slip back in effortlessly as Jennifer. I like Ari and Holly being old friends. Holly learning about John’s death reminded me of how John used to call her Nikki if my memory is serving me right. Doug who happily sleeps in high school Holly’s room shirtless and in his underwear is now asking about birth years. How old is he anyway?    The Cat and Chad romance is insulting. 
    • Her husband is Marty Levy. Chocolate Fortunes (her company) was started in 1987.  So that explains the mystery of 'Whatever happened to Pam Peters?' She had been running a successful business for decades.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy