Members EricMontreal22 Posted March 2, 2013 Members Share Posted March 2, 2013 That's what I was thinking (wrong thread?) Please drop the GH Alcazar stuff... I forgot all about the fact he even had a son... Though I'd love seeing more of LaChanze. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members hsfolk Posted March 2, 2013 Members Share Posted March 2, 2013 I'd think Michael Park would be a great recast of Dr. Dan Wolek Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members jfung79 Posted March 2, 2013 Members Share Posted March 2, 2013 I don't think the shows need a P&G invasion (as that's how it might be perceived) .. I don't want backlash. There is a strong P&G influence already behind the scenes and with some of the new cast, and I'm happy with that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members dragonflies Posted March 2, 2013 Members Share Posted March 2, 2013 I think GA would be all wrong for Cord and that's a role that doesn't need to be recasted I love GA and I am wondering if he's playing a character that's it's probably someone for Blair especially since Ted King said it didn't work out him coming to nuOLTL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members EricMontreal22 Posted March 2, 2013 Members Share Posted March 2, 2013 I know crossovers are largely not popular, but I wouldn't mind seeing minor ones at all. And as I think has been discussed, I don't see the jump in years being an issue whatsoever--it's not going to be aknowledged what year they're in exactly--time is such an ephemeral concept on soaps that it doesn't really matter (the only real difficulty is if you do something like Dallas/Knots where a character closely tied to one show by family connections, or whatever, is aknowledged as dead on one and then that's dropped on the other. IMHO even with the "dream season," if Knots hadn't aknowledged Bobby's death--though they were in the right to do so--it wouldn't have been an issue.) ...or Joe Riley... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cBr5LmgbGHc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members alexisfan07 Posted March 2, 2013 Members Share Posted March 2, 2013 Those were the ones I already have I was looking for a few different parts of the clip Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members EricMontreal22 Posted March 2, 2013 Members Share Posted March 2, 2013 It's funny--I don't think of GA as a P&G actor, simply because I grew up with him as Alec first. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DRW50 Posted March 2, 2013 Members Share Posted March 2, 2013 I don't think a handful of actors would be a P&G invasion. Besides, some of these people were also on ABC shows. P&G's older actors (older as in over 40 and up - a lot of those under that age I don't care about seeing again) were some of the finest on TV, and they would elevate any plotline. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members hsfolk Posted March 2, 2013 Members Share Posted March 2, 2013 Why is Tea's arm locked together with Cutter's? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members jfung79 Posted March 2, 2013 Members Share Posted March 2, 2013 I think it would depend on if it made sense to a character. I don't think people would like characters being essentially created to bring on a P&G veteran. Of course I agree with you that there were many fine P&G actors, and I would add many in the younger generation as well. I think Kim Zimmer would be a candidate to return to OLTL since she was just on it. How do you feel about that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members hsfolk Posted March 2, 2013 Members Share Posted March 2, 2013 I don't want KZ & it makes no sense bringing her back since Rex & Shane won't be around Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members jfung79 Posted March 2, 2013 Members Share Posted March 2, 2013 Yes, I wasn't proposing it ... I have a feeling Carl would not like it either and that's why I mentioned it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members EricMontreal22 Posted March 2, 2013 Members Share Posted March 2, 2013 I suspect because the photographer suggested they pose like that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members hsfolk Posted March 2, 2013 Members Share Posted March 2, 2013 now that I think about it, they would be a sexy couple Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Ryan Chamberlain Posted March 2, 2013 Members Share Posted March 2, 2013 Tuc is staring so hard at Josh. Look at the 2nd pic again. Ya'll. He's staring Josh up and down. LOL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.