Jump to content

Doctor Who


DRW50

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Looks like I spoke too soon on the Doctor meeting Clara as a girl not being on the show, LOL.

"Rings of Akhaten" was okay but a bit too weird for me. Did the god have its hunger satisfied forever? I liked all the singing and seeing Clara's parents.

Next week - "Cold War"

Edited by jfung79
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

Watched the premiere...it was OK, if low-energy. This reminded me more of the RTD era than anything else. My favorite part was Celia Emrie as the villainess. jfung, you may want to know that she played Doris Speed in the TV-movie about the early days of Corrie (Doris played original Rovers landlady Annie Walker). Celia was great in both roles.

I'm not a fan of the Doctor watching over Clara - those scenes actually made me feel a little uncomfortable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That's interesting, thanks for letting me know! Did you hear they're going to make a TV movie about the behind the scenes of early Doctor Who too? Must be the "in" thing over there for anniversaries of long running programs, LOL. GL also did it on our shores with the 70th anniversary.

The Doctor observing these future companions who then end up having romantic feelings about him as adults does seem a bit skeevy. The Moffat era has been full of that. I don't mind it as much anymore since it's been so common and Clara's not as smitten (yet).

Edited by jfung79
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I heard a little about it.

It's not just seeing her as a child - it was all the stuff keeping watch outside her house, standing over her as she was passed out at the table. I think Moffat sees this as a fairy tale aspect (which the fifth season emphasized quite a bit in the early episodes). At the time I wasn't bothered but this is the third time, and it's not the charm for me. I just think it makes the Doctor seem weird.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh, you meant keeping watch over her as an adult. I didn't find that weird, as she had just been threatened by a spoonhead. He was just guarding her. But the Doctor is supposed to be weird, LOL.

I also want to say, I can see why you felt "The Bells of Saint John" was like an RTD-era episode. To me that's a good thing. The present day setting, the reference to pop culture and the Internet, the old enemy, UNIT, the grounding of the companion in some of the people she interacts with in her normal life.

I think with RTD there would have been more of an emotional connection by the audience with the new character though. None of these Moffat-era female companions have been people who you could be like, "I relate to this woman." I'm thinking of Amy, River, and now Clara. Too much complicated backstory and not enough real life.

I think Moffat finds women too mysterious to write as relatable rootable figures that the audience identifies with, although I think he tries. There's a thread in his writing, not just for Doctor Who, where he has characters making comments like women are a foreign species. It's offputting. The only time I think he's ever pulled off a contemporary audience identification female figure who seems real and intelligent in "Doctor Who" is Sally in his RTD-era story "Blink."

Edited by jfung79
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's the tone of the scenes, more than anything else - it's all very dreamlike and how she is this precious creature he must unravel. She has no person. I'm getting a little weary of this, and things like River saying the Doctor only wants you when you're young and pretty. I'm not as into the "RTD wrote awesome women and Moffat is a sexist" as some fans are - in the long run I think Amy was the most progressive female companion of the revival, tied with Martha. But I want to see women as people, not as puzzles, or broken dolls.

I did like UNIT's involvement. I'm glad they are back as a force for good instead of the whole self-righteous lecture Ten gave them about how they love war. Stuff like that made me grow to dislike him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'd be interested to know more about what you mean regarding Amy and Martha being progressive, as to me they've been the least defined new companions. Martha was little more than a generic doctor, and Amy I don't even know where to start with how all over the map she was.

The Third Doctor would lecture UNIT too about their military mind, especially in "The Silurians." It's part of the nonviolent, anti-authoritarian ethos of Doctor Who to do that. UNIT is made up of well meaning people but the Doctor has never been lock step behind them, and there is a strong streak in the old show, not just the new, of making sure war, violence, guns, and military solutions are not glorified.

Edited by jfung79
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Amy and Martha made their own choices. They were both infatuated with the Doctor but over time stopped allowing themselves to be defined by him. Martha left and didn't look back. Martha did what she had to do to keep the world, or the galaxy, safe, whether the Doctor liked it or not. Amy was torn between "normal" life and time travel, but this was because of love of time travel as much as her bond with the Doctor. When Amy had to make the choice, she chose her husband, and was very happy and fulfilled for the rest of her life, instead of clinging to the Doctor's memory as a security blanket.

Donna's choices were ripped away from her and she was seen through the sad, patronizing eyes of the Doctor and her grandfather. Her "happy" ending was being reset back to zero and finding a good man. Rose's entire identity was about the Doctor, with the dubious reward of a knockoff of The Doctor. Not even getting into River.

The Third Doctor gave some lectures but he was also very fond of UNIT. Ten mostly just lectured with no real affection or complexity, and when he was reminded that he used people as weapons far more than anyone else ever could, the most we got was the trademark David Tennant sadface, all quickly forgotten.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Good points about Amy, Martha, Donna, and Rose. I wouldn't say the Third Doctor was fond of UNIT. He was fond of the Brigadier, Sergeant Benton, and Mike Yates, the people he worked with, who he got to know because he was exiled on Earth. If the Tenth Doctor had been talking to the Brigadier, he wouldn't have been as harsh.

I think it's not so much that it was forgotten that the Tenth Doctor had fashioned people into weapons, as Davros said, as that the Doctor knew Davros was right and there was nothing he could do about that hypocritical outcome anymore. The Doctor also murdered the Daleks and the Time Lords in the Time War. He knows he has blood on his hands. The fact the show brought it up though is a testament to their wanting to emphasize that this is morally problematic.

Edited by jfung79
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

No I didn't ... I don't think I'll be able to, as I already have so much that I'm watching and needing to watch. I don't know how you're able to watch everything you do, Carl, are you a Time Lord? LOL.

But thanks for the suggestion. Was she good in Emmerdale? I do like her acting so far in Doctor Who. It's not her fault her character has such a complicated, unrelatable, Moffat-grand-plan history so far.

The good thing about "Rings of Akhaten" is at least we know how Jenna feels about her mother, that's something to latch on to (more than Amy ever got - Amy may have made a "progressive" decision, but I still feel she was not a real character like Rose and Donna).

Edited by jfung79
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I never felt like Rose was a real character, I thought she was a huge Mary Sue. Amy's parents were not used and she was given too many stories where she was used and abused (the infertility story was especially unnecessary) but somewhere in season 6 I began to see her as real.

I watched JLC on Emmerdale when she was on the show. 2008, 2009. Her last story, a tense murder mystery and romantic reunion with Debbie, was very well done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Just saw this past Saturday's episode, "Cold War." A good one!

"Doctor Who" at its best! Strong moral elements. Great new twist on the Ice Warriors. "My people are dusssst" ...

Next week's episode: "Hide," by "Rings of Akhaten" writer Neil Cross but looks like it will be better than that story was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

"Hide" was indeed much better! Scary, good ideas, good characters, and at its heart, a love story. We also found out a little more about Clara (or found out there may not be more to find out), and we saw the TARDIS throwing a tantrum LOL.

Niggling issue though -- Matt Smith does NOT know how to pronounce Metebelis 3.

Next week -- "Journey to the Centre of the TARDIS"

Edited by jfung79
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
  • Members

"Nightmare in Silver" and "The Name of the Doctor" ended the season well! I'm satisfied with the mystery of Clara having been solved. "The Crimson Horror" wasn't bad either. I think the Cybermen were used well and I liked the Emperor who didn't want the responsibility. I also like that Angie and Artie were in the last three stories -- grounds Clara -- and that they even got to take a trip in the TARDIS. It was kind of irresponsible of Clara to take them into danger like that though without really warning them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • OMG! Yes!! Best of the episode and double so after my rewatch. She got Anita ALL...THE...WAY...TOGETHER. I can't wait to get caught up and see Sharon.   Now you.  re: Samantha.   Same. I was so annoyed with Month 2 for stalling on Martin's Secret, but in hindsight...that was perfect because I got used to their characters and their lives so NOW I feel so much more invested when the Secret comes out. And how it's been done as a slow burn during May Sweeps with Bill toying with them keeps Bill in villain mode while giving organic conflict for Martin and Smitty due to what's been written for them building up to this month. Bonus...it's clear the actors are soooo much more comfortable with each other.    The one thing that I looove about Vernon is that while that is very much true what you said...when need be...he shows very brief moments of an edge. CHOOSE SILENCE...like BE STILL...lives rent free in my head. lol. I can't wait to use that on someone. 
    • The last thing I want on a new soap -- or on any soap -- is an actor thinking she's a kid in a candy store. I know Cady has plenty of fans, but I'm just not fond at all of all these accents (and accent changes) and tics. The show should INSIST she settle on a consistent character for Pamela -- now. The idea that these established soap actors get to play around like it's a game is bizarre. I don't like what she's doing at all, and the fact that I can't tell you what she's doing makes it even worse.   The hour does fly by, and I do enjoy the show. I'm no longer on a high with the show and screaming "I love this show!" though. That's not a bad thing. We can't forget we're still in the first 6 months and every soap had to deal with first-year struggles and changes. I'm willing to give GATES time on all of it. In the meantime, though, I have to call out the stuff that isn't working. Yo're exactly right about the editing. Those "sudden drop offs to commercial"? I hate them. I think they're awful and poorly executed in all phases -- the timing, the music, the fade itself. I have no idea what they're doing. I've said this before: I think it's intentional. It's not just one director, and it's clearly a production choice. I think they want to be "the different soap." Sorry, this ain't the place to do that. They have not only ruined scene endings galore with these fades, but they have ruined cliffhangers. Ending a show with something dramatic followed by an "Oh, well" fade makes no sense to me.
    • I'll say this much...for the most part...soaps WERE giving this Sweeps...LOL. I'm looking at you, BTG, DAYS, and YES GH.

      Please register in order to view this content

          But knowing that, I really want to know...especially since I'm behind on at least two of those soaps lol due to work and faulty technology...how would you all grade May Sweeps this time?   A     B     C     D     F       To paraphrase Dani Dupree...the hottest level of Hades...?   How did you like Sweeps?    
    • 5-26   My system went down, but thankfully is back up. It's a shame that if I missed something, I just don't care. So May Sleeps indeed. smh.    That said...I found this episode intriguing. Yeah, it had a LOT of the characters that I didn't care about. And I know @slick jones probably glared seeing his man around that girl,

      Please register in order to view this content

       but I will give credit where it's due.    It must be a sign there is about to FINALLY be story movement when we start to get artistic camera angles again...something that has been absent for a while. The overhead sweeping into the scene at the start of the episode? LOVE. Good to see Ed Scott is still around somewhere. And I loved what Phyllis had on and Amanda in the red. Claire continued to have her own style and Holden continued to look hot. And I continue to be in awe that the designer is trying her darnest to get Kyle from looking so stuffy but still keep him suited.    Everything Audra continued to intrigue. And I continue to feel that Kyle is totally going to fall into her trap because he is much too cocky. Holden is a great wild card, but I don't like him hinting that perhaps Audra actually have feelings for Kyle. THAT boat has sailed and would have been better used when Summer was around. Besides I love Audra with Nate.   Phyllis vs Sally will always be awesome. And they were both giving great lines.    I could care less for Billy. 
    • invitations received during May 30 US (May 29 CDN) episode

      Please register in order to view this content

      You are cordially invited to join ARISTOTLE  DUMAS for an extended stay at his summer home in NICE, FRANCE Departure June 13, 2025 Travel details to follow
    • -- I agree that the vibes are there, but I can also make the case that it's a pale imitation. That Neil Winters Lounge is already a pretty classy place, but the decor make it look tackier. Those Happy Birthday signs are tragic in design and color. The tablecloths look like they've been chosen by Helen Keller. Where is Claire? We hear stupid reasons for her lateness, but we all know it's because this show is too cheap to pay for too many actors in any one episode. It makes NO sense that Victoria has that toast to Nikki without Claire's presence. And where is Cole? Off coughing somewhere? -- The rest of the show was watching people open their black invitations from Alexander Dumas -- for a party on June 13...TWO WEEKS AWAY. So we got through the entire sweeps and still no Dumas? The big sweeps reveal is a party in France in 2 weeks??? Why anyone thinks this is good soap is beyond me.  
    • Chandler Massey smirked in EVERY scene in which he appeared. He's not a good actor. He cannot get into character, ever, and plays every scene like he's Chandler running into an old friend on the street. I hate it because actors should take their work seriously and respect it and everyone around them.   It's all so real, to the point where there's no sense trying to separate Drake from his character. I snarked a lot over the years about Drake Hogestyn's acting -- very arch, lots of tics, over-the-top at times -- but I also think he was a great soap star. There was so much humanity in everything he did, and he was always a comforting and stabilizing force on screen. Flashbacks on soaps are almost always special and fun, but does anyone come across as more loving and filled with humanity than John? I don't think so. DAYS has suffered a lot of loss in the past few years. For me, this one hits the hardest.
    • “I’m not a lifelong soap fan, but I sure am now,” Wolf tells PEOPLE about creating the documentary Soaps, which includes deep dives into the biggest and most successful soap operas in the industry, with a strong focus on The Bold and the Beautiful. “It reflects, in a broader way, the cultural significance of soap operas and the incredible task involved in bringing these stories to the screen every day.”
    • I have this for the 4th act on 11/9/88, which per my files, is the first time John and Stefano are in a scene together: Limo (Roman, Diana, Stefano, Milo) Then their second time together is 11/17/88 in the second-to-last act: ON LOCATION: Beach & Cliff (Diana, Roman, Stefano) I'd have to check the 2016 logs, so I don't know who shares scenes as easily in this year, but these are the last 4 episodes that John and Stefano were both in together: 1/8/16, 1/11/16, 3/1/16, 3/2/16.
    • I'm going to respond to you about this show. I've been accused of hating on it for some reason or another. But as a 53-year-old black man I do not hate this show at all. It heavily represents people like me, but I want it to be treated well and not just pushed with half-assedness, which is what I feel has happened on several occasions so far. Bad editing, bad cliffhangers, or no cliffhangers at all, disappearing characters with dropped storylines, etc. I can understand shows no longer wanting certain characters or  storylines, but why the "Judy Winslow" effect? I'm really finding it weird that Jacob doesn't mention his father or his detective partner. Jacob was smack dab in the middle of them both.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy