Jump to content

GH: Classic Thread


Max

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 7.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

Ive always remembered that cover but never seen the mag. Thanks for the pics. Was that Katherine popular as a character and/or with Robert? I dont remember her but read about her in his bio. How long was she and and why did she leave? I dont know why they created another unrelated Katherine so soon after she left

Hugo Napier looks like Bob S Woods in that pic

Edited by Cheap21
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

She was on for about a year and a half or two years. I'm not sure if she was a big fan favorite but I think they were popular - a lot of fans never wanted Anna/Robert together and preferred him with Katherine (or Holly) and Anna with Duke.

She left when Robert turned down her marriage proposal.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=78j7ckF77NU&feature=relmfu

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TtVS_IX-ET0&feature=relmfu

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s9UTi5zQkwI&feature=channel&list=UL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Is it safe to say that Robert Scorpio is the most successful GH leading man of all time? (This isn't a declaration, but an honest question.)

I ask because it seems that he is the only male whose pairings were all hits - so much so that each sector of Robert fandom will fight to the death (even 25+ years later) over which pairing was his best and actually have a leg to stand on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

How long did Robert/Cheryl last? My impression of Robert was that he was a one-woman man whose relationships lasted a good while (well, at least in soap time).

As for Luke? I can't agree with that because I honestly don't believe that any of his non-Laura relationships ever came close to touching what he had with Laura (from what I've seen). Robert, from what I've seen, has had great chemistry with all of the women that I've seen him with. As much hoopla as Luke received as a leading man, I honestly think that Robert trumps him when it comes to having the great romances.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Luke and Laura were iconic, so it's not quite the same scale as Robert. Luke had fairly popular relationships with Holly (the first time around) and Tracy. His relationship with Felicia had some popularity before the show botched it. I think the only woman he was really really unpopular with was Jackie Templeton.

Robert and Holly were very popular. Robert and Anna were very polarizing, and were only a couple for about a year, onscreen, I believe. Robert and Katherine seemed popular but I guess not the test of time. He was with Tiffany but I don't know how received that relationship was.

Cheryl and Robert weren't together that long - I think they broke up because of her secrets (she'd been involved with Victor Jerome). The character was written in and out and in and out, and was not very popular. Even the actress disliked her role and felt like she was being conned by the show as they sort of treated her as a yo-yo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Luke/Holly were popular? I was under the impression that viewers were resentful of her because she wasn't Laura and that she didn't really start to take off as a character until she and Robert entered each other's orbit. As for Felicia, I guess I am in a minority because that whole idea was just a ball of suck.

(Was it Jackie herself that wasn't popular or the fact that she wasn't Laura?)

Robert was with Tiffany? Was this before Sean or during a break? (I vaguely remember Sean and Tiffany, as I started watching during their last year or two.)

Thanks for the background on Robert and Cheryl.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't think Luke and Holly were a big big couple but they were popular, just not on the level of Robert/Holly. Geary claimed that most of the audience anger went towards Jackie.

I think Jackie suffered from not being Laura, and Demi Moore being very abrasive in the role.

When Tiffany was on the show in the early 80's, and Robert was first around, the characters were lovers. I'm not sure but I think I read that Rogers and Wyatt did not get along. This was all before Sean.

Cheryl's main contribution to the show was invisible gay Lucas, and the Bobbie/Tiffany custody battle that some felt kept GH from sinking in 1992.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Would Jackie had taken off if she'd have been recast following Demi Moore's departure? Or was her character such a dud that she was better off being the distant memory that she became?

I didn't even know that Tiffany was on that long. (I just assumed that she came around the same time as Lucy Coe in the mid-80s)

I'd ask how Lucas' coming out was depicted on this show, but your reference to him as Invisible Gay says it all. Such a shame because I honestly believe that if his young adult character was around 5-7 years before that he'd have gotten a decent (and visible) storyline. SMH

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm not sure if recasting would have made a difference. The character had no real ties to Port Charles once her boring sister Laura left.

Tiffany first showed up during the Ice Princess story - she was in the jungle with Robert, Luke, Laura, etc. She was an actress, and romancing Victor Cassadine at the time, I think. Then she stayed around for a few years until Sharon Wyatt left. Sharon returned a few years later.

I think Lucas' story was seen for six months or somewhere around that. He came out, Bobbie had some issues, Tony died after a tearful scene with Lucas, Lucas was gay-bashed, he went out on a few dates (offcamera I think), he disappeared.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I agree.  Rena doesn't seem to mind the lighter workload and seems happy. Strangely, a lot of the veteran cast are without viable love interests-Sonny, Nina, Lois, Jason, Tracy, Alexis, Carly (Brennan doesn't count).  The show lacks serious interest in romance.
    • I just can't wait until next week when we can go back to a full weeks worth of episodes. 3 episodes and a mid-week gap has been so difficult to deal with, especially in light of how good the show is.
    • I always hoped they'd change Parker's paternity back to Phillip.  I guess it doesn't matter since Chloe is off the show currently.  I don't recall Holly or Maggie mentioning Parker, so it's not they are close to him. 
    • I’ve reached the summer of 1998.  Until now, my impression has been that the show has steadily improved since the great quality dip of 1994, reaching as high as 8/10 in 1997. Sure, I could complain about a few things in 1997 (Claudia got wasted after her initial storyline; Thorne’s feelings for Taylor were a bit too sudden; the storyline where Sheila lived with James and Maggie while pregnant got rather boring; Mike periodically revisiting Sheila despite being on the run from authorities), but overall it was a very strong year.  I liked the Thorne/Taylor/Ridge triangle, the mystery plot about who shot Grant, the sham wedding to trap Sheila, Stephanie/Eric/Lauren, and Clarke manipulating his way back to working at Forrester. I even liked the Greenland storyline with Eric/Lauren/Rush, although I had expected to hate it. Maybe 1996 tops 1997 in raw soapy excitement (especially as Sheila got a chance to interact with a larger canvas of characters), but certain problems with overall storyline cohesion puts it somewhat below 1997 for me. Unfortunately, 1998 has turned out to be a bit of a speedbump, perhaps on par with 1995 levels of quality: - Maggie’s character really got trashed after James left her to be with Sheila, and the early 1998 storylines where she imprisoned Sheila in the house from Psycho, or installed those wires and mikes and such in her house to make her think she’s going crazy, were total GARBAGE. So much so that the latter storyline (and Maggie with it) pretty much disappeared into a limbo.  - I have mixed feelings about the twins plotline with Lauren. No way did Rush survive being shot with a crossbow through the chest, and the romance between Lauren and Rush’s good twin brother Johnny was rather dry to me. I did however enjoy the camp aspect of Rush taking his brother’s place to be with Lauren, and Eric rescuing her. But it doesn’t appear like Bell cared too much about the Johnny/Lauren romance beyond the twin storyline gimmick, and it too disappeared in an unsatisfactory manner (come on, why not hire Johnny’s actor for just 5 more episodes for an arc where he realizes Lauren is not over Eric, or JUST SOMETHING?) - Clarke wormed his way back to FC in late 1997, which had exciting storytelling potential, but then he disappeared almost entirely. Sad to see my favorite character wasted in this manner. Does he get anything interesting to do between now and the Morgan saga of 2000-2001? - The Thomas saga was entertaining in 1997, but it got stretched out too much, and made some of early 1998 tiresome, with Ridge having to decide YET AGAIN which woman he wants to be with. On the plus side, I like the plotline of Thorne being neighbors with Macy and Grant, and we’ve finally been introduced to the SORASed Rick/Amber/CJ crowd. The Stephanie/James/Sheila triangle is also starting, and it makes me excited (I remember seeing some if it in my childhood). I know Sheila, Grant, and James are all leaving soon, which I honestly kind of dread - between them and Clarke’s near-absence, it feels like herd is going to get culled too much in the near future. But I know there’s the familiar 1999-2002 to look forward to.
    • LOL - this is a perfect description, and that's what I loved about it! May be a bit campy, but it immediately caught my attention in a good way.  I'm not familiar with the Fishing Trip storyline, I'll have to look that up. I've noticed that about Josh, which has made him less attractive to me overall. He just yells a lot when he's not happy. Wow, Reva was married to HB!  LOL - "Always... eventually, and again"
    • I love your ideas. I would love to see Jack grown up this confused unhinged individual. He should hold a grudge against both Brooke and Taylor.   
    • @chrisml

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Lois's return has been a bust. So disappointing that the writers have never written for her. As with Tracy, the pool of GH vets is so thin, there's no one to pair her with. Doubtful they would go to the trouble of properly recasting a legacy character and then sticking  him with Lois; they're obviously not that invested. If she wants to be on this show, it'll be as a noisy grandma who stays in the background. 
    • I love me some Anita and TT. They need to give her a good storyline and I know that it's coming. 
    • @Franko Thanks for tagging me. A few days ago I was talking in another thread about the rise of "snarky" critics for TV shows in the '90s online recaps, but this is just more along the lines of a mauling. There's also the unspoken reality that films like Steel Magnolias were seen as movies for women, so therefore they sucked. Pauline Kael also had her share of blunt, at times incredibly nasty remarks, but the vitriol is often balanced by her love for film. I'm not seeing that here.  With that said, the comment about Field's work becoming unbearable describes how I felt when I tried to sit through her and Maura Tierney on ER. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy