I agree but... I think sometimes it is fair to ignore history--is that the same thing? I remember in (the book I always bring up) All Her Children, and this was 1976, Agnes Nixon talks about how you have to know when to cut your losses with a character's backstory and, if not ignore it, no longer reference it (I think she specifically was talking about Ann Tyler's backstory when the show started, but I might be mis-remembering.)
This isn't quite the same thing, but that's one reason I didn't mind the retcon of Erica/Kendall on AMC although I admit ultimately the years and ages of the characters were ridiculous (due to many factors.) Certainly I think it does make sense (in a soap opera way, but also to an extent in real life) for a character to be so upset by the trauma of rape and having a child when they are young that they never bring it up again. And on the other hand, with the "unabortion" that does NOT make sense, partly because it goes into sci fi that it would have even been a possibility and because there would have been some awareness of doctors involved, etc, for Erica at that stage in her life.
By
EricMontreal22 ·
Create an account or sign in to comment