Jump to content

Was another Nixon soap really necessary?


Recommended Posts

  • Members

As great as Doug Marland was, and he was fantastic, you didn't want to cross him. He went to bat for his shows and his actors. The reason he quit Guiding Light was Allen Potter basically truncated his Carrie split personality story and fired Jane Elliot. BIG mistake on GL's part. Marland's writing and the wonderful stories were a huge reason why GL was a strong second to GH during the early 1980s.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 64
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

OK, this is an equivalent of a supernova exploding somewhere in the universe. Bill Bell, Khan, Bill Bell? I thought you were so Nixon. Or, better, so Douglas Marland. Why him?

Just like someone said, yeah, they did, and it didn't work. And it wouldn't have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You know, I remember seeing Agnes Nixon's archive interview and I was disappointed. It's not really a fun interview to watch as this woman who has created two of my favorite soap operas and some of the most memorable characters comes off a bit flakey...but come to think of it, show me a genius who isn't. Nixon sort of gives the interviewer heck during certain points of the interview. I can't tell if the interviewer wasn't prepared or Agnes was having a bad day but it's not like all the other interviews that were pleasant and interesting to watch like Erika Slezak's or Ruth Warrick's. Has anyone else seen the interview?

If I recall too, I think EricMontreal22 shared this with me, doesn't Windser Washam say the reason Agnes and he got along well was because she offers the romantic, fanciful side to the character, while he offers doses of reality? Maybe she was too "romantic" for Douglas Marland, who I think was able to balance fantasy/reality with mastery in his own writing.

And what was the theme of Loving? All My Children is the "brotherhood of man", and One Life is something to that effect just told through various diverse characters...what was Lovings theme?

Erik

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh Lord, and when the government decides to finally tear the old place down, the kids chain themselves to the front steps. "It's the only place hwere we have a voice!!"

I always figured Loving's theme was the simple and generic "old-fashioned soap opera." Old-fashioned soap opera about what, Aggie?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Because, Sylph, if I were the head of ABC Daytime, it would make perfect financial sense to court the man who was responsible for huge successes with CBS (with Y&R) and NBC (with DAYS). Charlie Sheen: "Duh!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes, but Agnes Nixon (and by the way, her nickname is "Aggie," not "Nessie") already had her hands full with AMC; and while a soap created and head-written by Marland alone would have been tempting, the truth is, even then, Y&R was a juggernaut. Sorry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

No need to apologize. And I'll call Agness whatever I want to call her. Aggie goes on my nerves, both as a nickname and as a person. ^_^

Plus I agree with you, they should've asked Bell, who hasn't really had his hands that much 'free' in those days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Erik and I discussed this privately--and it's also been covered a lot in the Loving thread in the canceled soap folder, though that thread is pretty huge now, but...

Remember Agnes did that with ALL her soaps. She liked to own them herself for their first 5 years before even soncidering selling them. I believe her two production companies were Dramatic Creations and then Creative Horizons but I can never remember which name owned AMC and OLTL and which owned LOV--but the belief was (she discusses this in All Her Children :lol: ) that after that time they would have some sort of foundation. She said she hated the business aspects, and was always relieved to sell them to the network, but wanted to have some footing established. For whatever reason--prob low ratings, Loving was never sold (nor was The City, prob one reason it was given such a short chance).

ABC wanted a 30 min soap there. *They* approached Nixon--I get the impression from her insanely long youtube interview that shw was happy not doing another soap.

Some interesting points though--originally the show was to be created with Dan Wakefield, the uber fan/author of All Her Children (who was an acomplished novelist and had created the late 70s teen drama--a big influence on Dawson's Creek apparently but a flop--James At 15/16). For whatever reason he got scared off nad backed down, and it was only then that Doug Marland came in and got co creation credit. When Marland left after his year again (for whatever reason--but he was the first HW not Nixon) he asked that his name be taken off of the credits. In its first year or two the show garnered big critical praise but it never caught on. And yeah it did feel very much like AMC--actually AMC was getting bigger and more big city/business oriented at that time, and I think on purpose Agnes wanted ot have a soap that felt like the 1970s AMC. Of course at the time this was against the fasion of nearly all other soaps--established and new ones.

Agnes Nixon was official HW on AMC only a few times--when Marland left was one, and in 1994 (a very good year) was another--but in the late 80s especially it really had a hard time finding an identity and went through a huge roulette of staff.

I do think Agnes' request should have been taken by ABC--which was to air it between AMC and OLTL where it could have established an audience.

But, in Nixon's defence, like I said it wasn't her idea to do a third show, and it did make sense for ABC to approach her for a new soap seeing how massive AMC and OLTL were at the time (Agnes served as well as overall ABC Daytime consultant back then).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I never knew AMC was a conservative soap ;) I get what you say but... I mean when Capitol came out, critics all complained they barely took advantage of their setting.

While I do think soaps back in the day were more sitinctive, sometimes I think modern fans put too much stock in this. It was more about the actual style--but really most of the major plots on early 1970s ATWT were similar to early 1970s AMC--it was more about tone, AMC had more comedy and was less conservative, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Right, I think she felt bad about Ellen being let go on OLTL but by that time really had no power over Rauch, but did control Loving. Ellen saw it as a dig. (and of course before angie joined they did have the big Carter Jones AMC story's climax air oon Loving--the crossover that as a kid made me a fan, I had never even HEARD of Loving before lol).

I like this idea actually. I do think LOV's early time slot hurt it (it did do a bit better when they exchanged its slot with Ryan's Hope a year in something Hope fans never forgave it for). West coast it aired before noon--not a good time for soaps IMHO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy