Jump to content

Survivalist soap


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Watching some of the early episodes of Survivors, I was thinking about how the premise of that show could easily be put into a soap format. Some sort of disaster or worldwide catastrophe, followed by showing the social classes destroyed and focusing on people trying to get through day to day and trying to find out if anyone else still exists. Strong female characters, presumed death of loved ones and attempting to find them, coping with the loss of many friends and family and trying to take over what they once helped you get through, gender conflicts, a disease which could take hold over a number of episodes, trekking from one location to another, relationships which develop over a long period of time -- this could take up 4-5 days of episodes for many months.

With all the paranoia out there now, over 2012, and over the messages from people like Glenn Beck, and the general unease over the economy and over what might happen tomorrow, the show would probably have a strong potential audience, as long as they didn't get too political or get too caught up in their own hype, or in some big mystery (when you focus too much on a mystery the answer is never going to satisfy a lot of viewers -- if the show even bothers to try to explain the mystery).

So do you think this idea would possibly work as a soap?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes Carl! That's a fantastic idea.

I really like it a lot. It could definitely be a soap to appeal to many audiences. Very good idea. It would provide a lot of depth for the characters too. Especially having all classes of characters stuck in this one setting. The attitudes of the rich still flare, but they arre brought crashing down to reality when they realize that they are trapped in a place where they have equally as little as the poor. Enemies would obviously be trapped together, and rivals would form. The fight for survival would tear some couples apart, and put forbidden ones together.

Great idea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah, I've heard the second season (which I haven't watched yet) is sometimes described as "Emmerdale Farm" and that the third season has a lot of starcrossed love material The early episodes have some of the best of the serial format, they build, and they slowly introduce characters and we watch them adapt. That's what soaps should be about. Seeing people who are very well defined and we can care about them and watch how they grow. Abby Grant is such a classic character, she could be a match for a lot of the strong females on soaps. Then you have her romance with Jimmy Garland, two charismatic, gorgeous, complicated, scarred people who are just a little larger than life -- that's good soap.

The idea of so many different people coming together to form some type of a family is also what I like about soaps, and of course,

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


  • Community Posts

    • This will drag into the primaries. His NY trial isn't until March of next year. I suspect the same will be true for his federal indictments and whatever Georgia hits him with.
    • I'm kind of sorry that it happened now for Trump. I hoped it would drag on well into the primaries so that he'd tear all of them apart.  Now, there's too much recovery time for them.  And I still hold to what I've always said - if we ever have a female as President, it will be Republican.   A huge % of women do not really like strong women.  They like stupid subservient ones.  Like Palin.  Like Haley.
    • agreed that the writing for craig was atrocious in the final years. funny thing, though,  about hunt block is that i really like him as ben warren on gl, when he did play the emotional layers. so i wonder if something else was going on. maybe what he was playing was closer to the vision chris goutman had for the character. after scott bryce was fired in 2008, he gave an interview to michael logan and described his relationship with goutman as “odd, and disconnected,” then talked about how dark the show had become and suggested that maybe he “didn’t fit into that vision.”   
    • Nothing in our elections will ever be a breeze. The truth is they never have been. It's just that too many people took progress for granted and threw it away because Bernie told them that their student loans were more important than our civil rights and bodily autonomy. This was a damn fine week. Chris Licht fired, Trump indicted, Pat Robertson and James Watt both dead. (I don't know how many people here remember James Watt but he was a monster.) and SCOTUS actually protected voting rights for once. The election is 18 months away. It's counterproductive to worry about it now. People love to point out Biden's age but then turn around and act like Hamhock is some kind of supervillain. Trump is dying right in front of us but Joe Biden tripped on a sandbag. This is a marathon not a sprint. Let people celebrate the good.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy