Jump to content

Downton Abbey: Discussion Thread


Sylph

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 180
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I get that in a way, some of it is "period drama porn" but I *love* this show--I checked it out immediately cuz Julian Fellowes was writing it. It seems like the kinda show PBS woulda snapped up in a heartbeat back in the day--I wonder if they'll try (or can afford it...)

I admit I only first heard about it because of a friend of mine who lives in Bristol told me how excited he was that one of his tv crushes, Rob James-Collier was playing gay. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

A term I picked up somewhere--I think some grumpy UK critic. It means something they know will get a certain audience merely because the period details--design, manners, etc--are so well done and appealing, no matter if there's any actual quality otherwise. (Similarly I've heard fashion porn used a lot). A lot of the lesser UK remakes of classics would prob fall into this category--there's a built in audience no matter the actual quality of the adaptation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Enjoyable show. We are just three episodes in so it is still early days but ITV have clearly invested a lot in it, so there is much biting witticism (thanks, dame Maggie Smith -- worth the price of admission alone), sumptuous decor, butler rivalry, moments of tenderness, repressed passion (including gay passion) and whatnot. And because it is set in 1913, you know that mega-tragedy is looming.

If it continues in its current vein then I will be glad that ITV ordered more episodes. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I dunno, for some reason I wasn't too surprised... I think the UK realizes that these kinds of shows are watched by a lot of gay men (and perhaps even more to the point that a lot of the female fans watching like such storylines). I wonder if it would affect PBS trying to pick up the show in this day and age--I'm sure they've shown gay kisses in their dramas more recently, but the last one I can remember was in the mid 90s with Tales of the City and we all know how they were pressured by various groups not to air the followup series (partly due to the light nudity as well)--and that was back when American tv was experimenting with pushing more boundaries than they do now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ha, I did hear about that. But I think ITV primetime is quite different--I identify the channels more from the Summer I spent in London and then Autumn in Dublin--which was '99, so ages back. But ITV back then showed FAR more risque programming than the BBC it seemed (BBC2, which showed This Life earlier, and the other BBCs were edgier). Of course 4 had already screened the first season of Queer as Folk. At any rate I do think ITV feels this show ahs to compete.

Thanks for the link BTW. I was a massive Upstairs/Downstairs fan when it was rerun on W here in Canada when I was a teen--even tracked down the spin off series. But I really don't have much hope for this new one for some reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
  • 3 weeks later...
  • Members

Here I was all excited to tell friends (well and my Grandma :P ) who I knew would love Downton Abbey about it's premier on Masterpiece Theater on PBS this weekend, only to find out that--even though not mentione din any reviews I've read yet) it's been cut down by over an hour to make it more understandable to American viewers and faster paced. OY. The irony to me is that it's already one of the quicker paced costume series I can think of, and this is PBS, isn't it meant to be home to people who don't like what they usually find on network tv? They've also been advertising it for fans of Upstairs/Downstairs (partly to tie into the premier of the new Upstairs/Downstairs coming in April to PBS), and it certainly moves MUCH faster than that. I also wonder if, being PBS and their squeamishness about a lot of gay content ever since they got in so much trouble mid 90s for Tales of the City, this means they'll easily cut away the few gay scenes?

Anyway, I'm pretty disappointed, and feel far less guilty about downloading it and watching it online instead of waiting for PBS. A good article on this:

Its intricately detailed plot and sumptuous production values, with lingering shots of the magnificent stately home, made Downton Abbey the TV hit of last year.

Unsurprisingly, the lavish period drama has now been snapped up by an American network - although it seems the beautifully nuanced portrait of pre-First World War upper-class life could prove just a little too complex for the trans­atlantic audience.

For in the land of the notoriously short attention span, TV executives have taken a knife to the artfully crafted series, slashing its running time and simplifying the plotline for fear viewers will be left baffled.

Rebecca Eaton, an executive producer for the PBS network - which will be airing it from next week - admits that American audiences demand a 'different speed' to their shows.

As a result, Downton, which ran for eight hours on ITV, has been slashed to six for the States, while the story­line about the inheritance of the Abbey has been downplayed.

The show's ten million British viewers will be well aware that much of the drama revolves around challenges to the 'entail' - the legal device which determines how the estate should be divided up - after Lord Grantham's heirs perish on the Titanic.

But Ms Eaton said: 'We thought there might be too many references to the entail and they have been cut. It is not a concept people in the US are very familiar with.'

However, that did not seem to faze British viewers, who would have been similarly unaware of the term before watching the series.

PBS also believes its audiences will need an American to outline the key themes of the show.

So before the first episode, actress Laura Linney will explain the inheritance principle.

She will also inform viewers that the idea of a wealthy American heiress such as the fictional Cora Countess of Grantham coming to the rescue of a hard-up aristocratic British family is rooted in fact.

On ITV, the series, which starred Dame Maggie Smith, Hugh Bonneville and Elizabeth McGovern, ran with advertisements, while PBS - the Public Broadcasting Service - is free of commercials.

Nonethe­less, Ms Eaton admitted cuts had been made to fit Downton Abbey into four 90-minute episodes.

'American audiences are used to a different speed when it comes to television drama and you need to get into a story very quickly,' she said.

'We also wanted to get to the point where Matthew Crawley [the family's middle-class cousin and unlikely heir] arrives on the scene much faster than in the British version. He is a pivotal character and his arrival brings with it drama and conflict.

'In the British version he doesn't arrive until episode two. In our version he is there in episode one.'

Ms Eaton insisted that any changes were minor and did not affect the quality of the programme. It will, however, be released in its entirety in the States on DVD, billed as the British original.

That may not be enough to please some viewers, who have taken to the internet to register their displeasure. One wrote: 'Americans are getting the short end of the stick and PBS doesn't seem to care.'

Another said: 'It is not complete... I fear for the reputation of this [version] over in the States.'

Julian Fellowes, the show's Oscar-winning writer, refused to be drawn into the debate. 'This is not one for me,' he said last night.

He also declined to speculate about the show's likely reception in America, saying: 'I have been in this business long enough to know you should never try to predict the fate of anything.

'I do know Americans are very responsive to new drama and they have a powerful television drama tradition.'

The image of formal, refined English life has already won some fans in the States, with one website describing it as 'transcendent television, extraordinary and intoxicating'.

http://community.livejournal.com/ohnotheydidnt/54752776.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I don't think they were the biggest factor, but I do think there's a specific style to Dano's work that wasn't helped by how pointless her character often felt (and later on the various writers clearly saw the character as a joke).
    • I think Evie came in mid 1976 after Rita broke up with Tim because she realized she was leading him on.  And Evie became upset with Rita because she didn't tell her that she had previously dated Tim before she came to town.
    • Please stop, you were wrong, and you know it, now you're trying to back pedal. You even got called out by the DAYS actors/actresses on Twitter for that sh*t. It was disgusting and vile and IMO the family should have taken action against you It was clear the general public did not know about his illness and it was NOT your place to "spill the beans" just because you run a Facebook group, period! TBH IMO @Errol should have banned you ages ago Donna 
    • Who went bowling? JFP & Anna? Is there any more to this?  
    • Another character driven show with interconnecting plots that make sense. I like that we go from one character, like Sarah, learning that EJ wants to buy the hospital, casually mentioning it to Xander who now has that intel. The only down today was not seeing Steve and Shawn breaking into the lab. I wonder if Dr Poofy Hair will inform EJ about Xander's call. I loved Abe talking to Chanel about losing Isaac and giving her comfort. And helping her voice her fears about Johnny. Kayla standing up to EJ is great. Kayla, freed from Ron, has been great. I am loving all her air time. And Sarah telling her that EJ must be up to something if he wants the hospital is very smart. She would probably clue in to the sepsis research being the big thing if she wasn't choking to death. I assume Felicity messed up the scones and dropped in cleaning fluid or something. Sarah said it tasted weird. They are never getting that honeymoon, are they? Xander has no clue what job Johnny can do. Johnny knows this too. Xander wants to legitimize his takeover by hiring a Dimera. Johnny wants to stick it to EJ. The honesty is refreshing. I want to like Cat and Chad but they are just so awkward. And none of their scenes work for me. Marlena and EJ was very good. I like her wanting to help him but also scared to death for Belle. Makes perfect sense that she is conflicted. I also liked her softly asking Johnny if he needed her to stay once EJ walked in. Ron never cared about this relationship either, but now she is acting like his granny.
    • Sorry, catching up, and the bolded part, yes! Should have been sued by DH's family for that nasty sh*t too   Anywho, back to the show, Kristina is freaking nuts, she needs to be committed ASAP
    • Angry Dante was hot; sorry, but I'm not going to pretend it wasn't awesome seeing Dominic Zamprogna act his ass off in a way that was not crying.
    • Thanks, interesting and so believable (no Lonatrat or Clones...)Instead of the Lewis family he should have made the Oil family Granger...even if the audience didn't remember that one off character it would have been interesting to tie it into the fictional GL world.
    • Dante needs stick removed from his butt
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy