Jump to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Soap Opera Network Community

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.
SON Community Back Online

An Open Letter from Ken Corday to Marlena De Lacroix

  • Members

I read with interest your article on "JFP", as you referred to Jill Farren Phelps, in your column about a revival on Another World (Critical Condition, Vol 6 Issue 50) While I congratulate Jill.who happens to be a friend and an excellent executive producer, I noted that throughout the article no one else is given credit, or even mentioned. This may be a subtle point, but subtlety is often the focus of those involved in dramatic serials, and i have always felt the success of any show in our genre is, and must be, a team effort made up of quality producers, directors and, of course, writers.

You even refer to how "Phelps has started to tool and retool most of her stories". No writer was given any credit, not even the head writer. I found it equally interesting that you ended the article by saying AW "should garner better ratings since head writer Jim Reilly's high rated days of Our Lives is providing great lead - in numbers." I must take issue with your giving all of the credit for Days' high ratings to the head writer, while completely ignoring the enormous team effort. You chose not to mention either my involvement,(co-executive producer) Tom langan's superb leadership and vision,nor our other wonderful producers, directors and writers who have taken Days from its position way down in the pack to No 2 in the demographics and overall household ratings.

It was certainly as much Tom Langan's vision and execution that brought our show to where it is today as it will be Jill Phelp's, should her show make the climb we all hope it will,

To sum up, i was simply surprised to see the credit for what is such an enormous team effort all go to one person wearing an executive producer hat on AW, and then see all of the credit go only to the head writer, and in possessive terms as though Days was his show, Jim reilly is a wonderful head writer, and we are very lucky to work with him, but without all of the other equally talented people the fans would have to stop by Jim's house each day to read the show.

Ken Corday,executive producer, Days of Our Lives.

Edited by Paul Raven

  • Replies 55
  • Views 7.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Featured Replies

  • Members

True Blood taps into what spirit? :blink:

The spirit of obsessive fandom. The way it sounds like many 60s soap fans were--where it's almost as important as their real life. True Blood and many other shows, just not daytime soaps much anymore.

(I know you dislike Alan Ball, Sylph, but surely you can agree with that statement?)

  • Members

So is SPW in fact the "proper" abbreviation these days? If so, gee, I wonder who was behind that. (Follow my eyes...)

In fact, no, it would not be a gramatically proper acronym. But acronyms are sometimes subjective, and people take liberty with them.

Whether someone says "SOW" or "SPW," we generally know what they're talking about. It's not that big a deal to me, one way or the other. (Not something I'd care to debate - the soaps haven't become THAT boring yet... have they? happy.gif )

I was just explaining why they didn't consciously use SOW. The mag's original publisher may have even been involved with that one.

  • Members

Well, Ball does it rather lousily.

Does what? Gets fans to obsess over his shows? I'd say he does that tremendously well! Otherwise I think you're arguing something that hasn't been mentioned or discussed here :P

Edited by EricMontreal22

  • Members

As I have naturally become the ditz of this board, I feel I can freely ask, in SPW, where does the P come from? (confused, :blink: )

  • Members

Last letter of soaP - this is done with acronyms sometmes when the next letter normally used would be a vowel. Don't ask me why...

Edited by EricMontreal22

  • Members

Does what? Gets fans to obsess over his shows? I'd say he does that tremendously well! Otherwise I think you're arguing something that hasn't been mentioned or discussed here :P

Precisely: he has his fans, he doesn't really draw new people in.

  • Members

The fact that True Blood more than doubled its audience in season 2 says nothing? -_- Or that Six Feet Under gained viewers in Season 4? :huh:

At any point, I just meant that primetime can still get people to become absorbed in the drama and characters in a way daytime no longer seems able, for a myriad of reasons.

Edited by EricMontreal22

  • Members

In fact, no, it would not be a gramatically proper acronym. But acronyms are sometimes subjective, and people take liberty with them.

Whether someone says "SOW" or "SPW," we generally know what they're talking about. It's not that big a deal to me, one way or the other. (Not something I'd care to debate - the soaps haven't become THAT boring yet... have they? happy.gif )

I was just explaining why they didn't consciously use SOW. The mag's original publisher may have even been involved with that one.

Oh I was just asking YurSoakinginit, please don't think I was trying to start a debate. :D I've just always used and seen "SOW" and I didn't know that "SPW" was also widely used.

  • Members

So is SPW in fact the "proper" abbreviation these days? If so, gee, I wonder who was behind that. (Follow my eyes...)

It always was their official abbreviation. I was never sure if it stood for "Soa Popera Weekly" or "Soapo Pera Weekly." I've always called it SOW, though.

It was SOW's Mimi Torchin who made spoilers mandatory in our little corner of the television universe, and I blame those for killing soap opera. SOD always used teasers to make you want to watch next week, or the week after (it was bi-weekly). When SOW came into being, spoilers were a way to get readers to buy SOW instead of the more sedate SOD, by telling them exactly what was going to happen next week. And they only got worse over time, moving onto the cover in 72 point (at least) type.

Mimi and her spoilers spoiled the soaps for me, permanently. I haven't been a serious watcher since AW ended in 1999. I gave up ATWT after Marland died, went back to it, and quit it again when Carly came to town.

Then I tried OLTL. The week before Easter in either 2000 or 2001, the issue of SOW that was on the racks at the grocery store gave up some essential plot point about a train wreck involving Bo and Nora and Will Rappaport as they were taking Will to Statesville Prison. It happened to be the same week the Elian Gonzalez story was coming to a head. I knew what was going to happen on OLTL, so I tuned in Fox News and CNN to see the latest Elian developments. I like not knowing.

I never watched OLTL again except for a peek at the gay characters.

I know some people actually like spoilers, and I'm not seeking to pick that fight again. You win. But it was the end of the thing for me. I'd been watching AW and ATWT from 1988 and 1989, and I had a mostly good run with those shows. I didn't watch anything for about five years after the Elian/OLTL weekend, and then started up with Y&R in 2005 or so. I never liked those people, but Kevin and Gloria made it mostly watchable. I didn't mind LML, either. But this latest bogosity made me give up entirely some months back. Especially with spoilers, there's no reason in heaven or earth to watch this show.

I watched Luke and Noah on ATWT at first, but realized CBS or P&G wasn't up to the task of presenting an authentic gay relationship on that first, kissless, New Years Eve, and gave up on soaps again. I picked World Turns up again when Reid came to town. How sad they couldn't have done this story 20 years ago, when soaps were better written. OTOH, it may be that whoever's in charge of things there now just doesn't give a [!@#$%^&*] about the Religious Wrong, and that's the only reason we're getting this very decent storyline. And there's not a whole lot of "what happens next?" tension, so I just watch my boys. [!@#$%^&*] the rest of the show. It died circa 1995.

But once ATWT's done, then I'm done. No more soaps. And I blame Mimi Torchin and her spoilers for setting the stage of my discontent. When a parasite like a soap magazine takes "what happened next?" away from the creator of the thing it purports to love, support, and promote, something is very, very wrong. It destroys what it nominally supports. And it's been that way for a good long time. For this reason, if for no other, the thing deserves to die.

I'm glad I got to see a gay love triangle on a daytime drama. I had hoped it would star Steven Frame on AW, but Luke Snyder is really the next best thing. And that's all there is.

Bravo and adios, daytime.

Edited by Jay

  • Members

It always was their official abbreviation. I was never sure if it stood for "Soa Popera Weekly" or "Soapo Pera Weekly."

:lol:

That was a great post Jay, I find your point of view very interesting (and agreeable). And I admit to doing a bit of a silent cheer when you referred to the soap mags as "parasites". I've enjoyed great interviews and featurey stories they've done over the years, but I've been turned off by some of the behind the scenes goings on I've read about and in some cases I think the only thing separating some of the staff members from your stereotypical kooky soap fans is the paycheck.

The worst spoiler moment I've ever experienced was watching Tammy hold on by a thread on GL and at the commercial break an ad for SID plugging their article on Tammy's shocking death. WOW.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.