Members Y&RWorldTurner Posted April 11, 2010 Members Share Posted April 11, 2010 I think it was definitely the character identities on the show that made Designing Women come off as a cheap knock-off of the The Golden Girls. Julia was definitely the Dorothy of the group. Charlene was the Rose of the group. Mary Jo, though younger, was the stable and sharp Sophia-like figure. And of course, Suzanne was the Blanche of the group. We won't even get into those hideous replacements for Charlene and Suzanne in the later seasons. The character similarities were just uncanny, especially since Designing Women debuted, what, a season or two after The Golden Girls? Though, The Golden Girls was definitely the more intelligently written and acted show. It set the template for the other female friendship shows that followed, which I guess, Designing Women can be labeled as the first "follower." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members SFK Posted April 11, 2010 Author Members Share Posted April 11, 2010 I don't know enough about MC's work to judge, but I will say that his The 5 Mrs. Buchanans couldn't touch DW regardless of its excellent cast. His work on TGG was hilarious but imho that '90s penchant for ironic humor he introduced to the show in its later seasons hasn't aged as well as the character-driven wit and humor of the earlier seasons. And I mean, come on, Bernice and the Christmas tree skirt, Suzanne and the baby wig, "BLACK MAN, BLACK MAN, WHERE DO YOU COME FROM!?", that was some great stuff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Y&RWorldTurner Posted April 11, 2010 Members Share Posted April 11, 2010 Let's not forget, Cherry was also the show runner for Delta's flop Designing Women spin-off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members SFK Posted April 11, 2010 Author Members Share Posted April 11, 2010 TGG and 227 debuted on the same night and they both had that character set up. Dorothy-Mary Rose-Rose (though 227's Rose wasn't a ditz) Blanche-Sandra (both ladies found their feet and took off like rockets after the pilot) Sophia-Pearl Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members SFK Posted April 11, 2010 Author Members Share Posted April 11, 2010 Woman of the House! 'Twas awful indeed. Oy, iirc, Suzanne lipsynced "And I Am Telling You I'm Not Going" from Dreamgirls in the first episode. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Y&RWorldTurner Posted April 11, 2010 Members Share Posted April 11, 2010 I guess the difference was 227 was always marketed more to African-American audiences, though it had tons of White fans. Also, the women weren't living or working together on the show, at least from what I can remember. I guess if we want to get technical, The Facts of Life even had, though on a more primitive scale, this character set-up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Soapsuds Posted April 11, 2010 Members Share Posted April 11, 2010 I didnt feel 227 was anything like GG. The show was totally different. Mary was married and Dorothy wasnt. Mary had a daughter...Dorothy didnt.....Dorothy had a mother.....Mary's mother wasnt on the show..etc..... DW should have ended once Delta Burke left show. The show totally sucked once she left. At least the GG ladies stayed together till the end until the spin off happened. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members All My Shadows Posted April 11, 2010 Members Share Posted April 11, 2010 I always thought DW was very romance novel-ish, like if Danielle Steel wrote a sitcom. Definitely a compliment coming from me, though. I discovered DW before GG, so I always drew the parallels backwards, but GG had an explosion in popularity all over again in the 00s that DW will probably never get, unfortunately. If DW was airing at a decent time today, I'd watch it as much as I could. OT, but I always thought the template of 4 female characters is kind of a funny one. If you get vague with it, you can apply it to many, many TV shows and movies based around four females. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Soapsuds Posted April 11, 2010 Members Share Posted April 11, 2010 FOL...nah......I actually liked FOL and 227 more than DW. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members All My Shadows Posted April 11, 2010 Members Share Posted April 11, 2010 And Living Single as well. Jo - Dorothy - Julia - Khadijah Blair - Blanche - Suzanne - Regine Tootie - Rose - Charlene - Synclaire Natalie - Sophia - Mary Jo - Maxine Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members SFK Posted April 11, 2010 Author Members Share Posted April 11, 2010 Yeah, I don't think any of the shows we're talking about were similar beyond some very basic character archetypes. This is weird, but when I heard that Julia Duffy and Jan Hooks were coming to DW, I though they were playing recast Charlene and Suzanne. I think the concept of uppity Yankee-assimilated Allison was interesting, it just didn't work out. I love Jean Smart and would have preferred that she stayed, but I think Jan Hooks is damn funny. Judith Ivey is a great actor, but I found her B.J. to be a bit of a bore. She drew an interesting character, but I think she would have been more effective on the stage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Soapsuds Posted April 11, 2010 Members Share Posted April 11, 2010 Blair wasnt trampy like Blanche or Suzanne....lol Tootie as Rose...haha..nah Natalie was more the Rose part than Sophia FOL had no Sophia Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Adam Posted April 11, 2010 Members Share Posted April 11, 2010 Oh no! This is terrible news... I never really saw Designing Women, but I absolutely loved Dixie Carter on Desperate Housewives as Gloria Hodge. May she rest in peace! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Soapsuds Posted April 11, 2010 Members Share Posted April 11, 2010 All those ladies were awful on DW. I never got the appeal of Julia Duffy at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members SFK Posted April 11, 2010 Author Members Share Posted April 11, 2010 I don't think DW's humor is as obvious, as "easy" as TGG's. DW was not a "badumpbump" kinda show, not as colorful and OTT, and therefore, not a show I first think to turn to when skimming the sitcom selection for a good laugh. I have warmer feelings for DW that have everything to do with my mother. The reason why I'm on a soap opera board for that matter. As for the four women thing, you could take it as far as Knots Landing and of course SATC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.