"Dammit, I told you not to watch Y&R unless you got that caffeine IV. WAKE UP! WAKE UP!!"

+1.

God that interview was painful to read. Just tons and tons of offensive, lying, boring, ridiculous self-congratulation. And that little point where she says that she does not do everything they fans suggest? I almost though she'd namedrop Mark afterwards. And Rauch mentioning how Walton had not gotten what the scene was about and he had to "instruct" her? Honey, Walton would find a way to play a scene were she rapes Chloe and you still would be clueless.

I guess Maria and Paul no longer need toilet paper, given the rimjob Fairman gave them.

God, these people are so pathetic.

And Sylph basically sums up everything that needs to be said about how utterly pathetic Maria and her hack writing is.

Gotta love how they are basically lying through their teeth about bringing Phillip back or doing a gay relationship on the show. LOL. I guess some people out there are still buying it.

Bullshyt.

I wouldn't call bullsh*t on that. I mean, all you have to do is look at who trolls here and everywhere else and you can tell these idiots love stealing the most ridiculous and inane ideas from cheerleader fans. Or even better, use and manipulate fans into feeding spoilers and optimism to disgruntled, unhappy offliners.

I wonder why they didn't call on Miss Nellie for their latest interview?

Walton would find a way to play a scene were she rapes Chloe and you still would be clueless.

DON'T GIVE MARIA IDEAS!

And Rauch mentioning how Walton had not gotten what the scene was about and he had to "instruct" her? Honey, Walton would find a way to play a scene were she rapes Chloe and you still would be clueless.

What was it he was saying, that she didn't play Jill as being grateful enough that Tucker was somehow debasing himself by offering her a company? So he didn't think she was playing Jill as enough of a fool?

Edited February 10, 201015 yr by CarlD2

God that interview was painful to read. Just tons and tons of offensive, lying, boring, ridiculous self-congratulation. And that little point where she says that she does not do everything they fans suggest? I almost though she'd namedrop Mark afterwards.

I think she would have only namedropped him if she would have mentioned the Patty/Jack romance as being some sort of symphony of colors, light, mixed with a dash of Vanna White.

And Rauch mentioning how Walton had not gotten what the scene was about and he had to "instruct" her? Honey, Walton would find a way to play a scene were she rapes Chloe and you still would be clueless.

The notion that he would instruct an Emmy Winning Vet, a team player, a professional on how to "get" her scene is just laughable to me. But not surprising. She probably turned him down for sex back in the day at some post-Emmys party.

He's such a pig. Someone should torture him by shining a floodlight in his face and making him wear pastel colors.

DON'T GIVE MARIA IDEAS!

Oh don't worry. She'd only have Jill adjust Chloe's collar. It'd be very ambiguous and it'd be left up to the viewer's imagination.

Edited February 10, 201015 yr by bellcurve

Not to say anything about how Jill/Tucker relationship is all kinds of wrong. Jill is made to look like a total foooool, a woman with no brain. Pathetic.

Not to say anything about how Jill/Tucker relationship is all kinds of wrong. Jill is made to look like a total foooool, a woman with no brain. Pathetic.

We're lead to believe that THIS is Jill. The same Jill that can seduce Phillip Chancellor, Victor Newman, John and Jack Abbott?! The Jill we know and love would never cling onto a man like this or be beholden to him.

Edited February 10, 201015 yr by bellcurve

What was it he was saying, that she didn't play Jill as being grateful enough that Tucker was somehow debasing himself by offering her a company? So he didn't think she was playing Jill as enough of a fool?

Basically.

We're lead to believe that THIS is Jill. The same Jill that can seduce Phillip Chancellor, Victor Newman, John and Jack Abbott?! The Jill we know and love would never cling onto a man like this or be beholden to him.

Shameful, really. Just a disgrace.

I think she would have only namedropped him if she would have mentioned the Patty/Jack romance as being some sort of symphony of colors, light, mixed with a dash of Vanna White.

The notion that he would instruct an Emmy Winning Vet, a team player, a professional on how to "get" her scene is just laughable to me. But not surprising. She probably turned him down for sex back in the day at some post-Emmys party.

He's such a pig. Someone should torture him by shining a floodlight in his face and making him wear pastel colors.

Oh don't worry. She'd only have Jill adjust Chloe's collar. It'd be very ambiguous and it'd be left up to the viewer's imagination.

:lol:

Yes

:lol: Too true and sad.

Not to say anything about how Jill/Tucker relationship is all kinds of wrong. Jill is made to look like a total foooool, a woman with no brain. Pathetic.

+1

It's utterly sad what has been done to this character.

Oh don't worry. She'd only have Jill adjust Chloe's collar. It'd be very ambiguous and it'd be left up to the viewer's imagination.

Win.

Not to say anything about how Jill/Tucker relationship is all kinds of wrong. Jill is made to look like a total foooool, a woman with no brain. Pathetic.

And Rauch just HAD to give acting tips to Jess but none to her male cast mates.

And Rauch just HAD to give acting tips to Jess but none to her male cast mates.

Don't you know it? SN walked onto the set and was all kinds of sunshiney fabulousness! But Jess just didn't get it. So he had to explain it to her.

And Rauch just HAD to give acting tips to Jess but none to her male cast mates.

At least now we know why so many of the men have never been worse than they are now. Rauch probably just asks them to drag the women around by the hair.

And Rauch just HAD to give acting tips to Jess but none to her male cast mates.

I am embarrassed and offended by the treatment Jess Walton receives. It saddens me. Humiliating.