Jump to content

Guiding Light Discussion Thread


Paul Raven

Recommended Posts

  • Members

In a quick search, it must be between April 11th 1989 when Josh and Reva take Marah in for another DNA test, and the 28th when Josh tells Will that he is indeed Marah's father.

The German episode dates it as the 4/14 episode. It seems to be the same episode where Meredith miscarries Phillip's baby.

https://youtu.be/lp-rGkdEyQU?si=A86cxHUdIBL-kXGl

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 17.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

LOL...it's strange how your perspective changes. I know when I really started getting GL, I was into the romance of Kelly/Morgan and Quint/Nola. And honestly, I didn't remember a lot of early Vanessa. But in rewatching now, I can identify with Vanessa's more cynical assessment of love and romance. (see also Van showing up in black to Ross and Carrie's wedding...)

While I love Billy and Vanessa, I do wonder what Marland would've written for her, or what would've happened to her if Reva hadn't taken over the damn show.

re Reva: other then her momma and sisters, I can't think of a female friend she had. It's always a guy--Philip, Fletch, Hamp, Billy. Ooops...I suppose Abby. but I generally hated Amish Reva so...

It was great that GL built up Bill/Michelle/Ben from the time they were kids. Though it's a little weird that no one refers to Ben and Bill as cousins.

I do think Vanessa runs the Spaulding Foundation in 86, so they might have crossed there, and the kids' connection makes sense (not only Bill/Michelle, but a little during the Rick/Mindy years). It's just jarring sometimes when you rewatch an earlier era and don't see the interconnectedness that developed later. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think Marland would've given her a redemptive arc in the style of Nola's though. She almost seems like a Lucinda-esque prototype.

But I agree---I don't think Vanessa could've lasted as the neurotic mess she was before Billy much longer. It took her three years to get a viable romance. And other than Ed, I don't think any of her entanglements truly cared about her. Ross of this era is mostly just using her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I can't even remember that "romance" they just threw every diva at Fletcher and it never worked...I think he was like Frankie D, he must have had blackmail pics of execs at P & G to stay on the show for that long. 

They should have never recast Alex and let Van go back to her more controllling ways as rich matriarch of SF. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

What did surprise me in Vanessa's return is how hard she goes after Ross again. She tries manipulating him back into Spaulding, making a deal with Phillip (agreeing to back his idea to give WSPR to Blake in exchange for offering Ross a VP position.). Vanessa sure believed in work place romance. 

I think overall, Vanessa's return was handled well. There are times I wish OG Vanessa could've come out and dealt with her adversaries more, but when she did, it was awesome. 

 

The only women I thought Fletch ever worked with were Claire and Alex, and even with Alex he comes off as a lecturing dweeb.  He is so suffocating with Vanessa. Who intends to throw a rock on someone's finger after three months? Sure, they've known each other for a while, but he doesn't really understand what makes her tick. There's a wonderful moment where she tells him that a lot of what he admires in her now is the result of her having loved Billy, and that Fletch wouldn't have even looked at her then (which is so true, early Vanessa is just slightly less self-destructive than Blake.) Y'know, back in the days when shows actually did their homework instead just inventing character history to suit story.

Personally, I do think they needed Alex on canvas. And I'd certainly rather deal with Alex than Alan (all apologies to Ron Raines). But I certainly rather have dealt with a more controlling Vanessa than the Matt years.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I did watch a snippet of an episode from the fall of 1987 when Mo was still hospital Admin... and she was preparing to go to war with Alan over something he was pulling on the hospital and Ed.  So I don't think Van and Mo were going to interact as friends.. since it appeared they were on opposite sides in 1986.

Plus, I think Maeve was Mo's friend in 1987/88 until Maeve passes... and Vanessa was off canvas from January 1988 until around mid 1989.

I was surprised Vanessa had set her sights on Ross when she came back in mid 1989.. and she instantly disliked Nadine for being beneath her.  There was a scene where Vanessa came to see Ross as Holly left.. and said 'oh... she's attractive' to Ross.   Vanessa always viewed women as either competition or beneath her.. at least back in the 80s/early 90s.

In fact.. Billy/Nadine started because the two were in cahoots to keep Vanessa and Ross apart.. and then they fell into an affair themselves.

Fletcher was best with Claire.. both were head strong and full of passion/adventure.  

However, I did like his opposite attract relationship with Maeve.. she kept him in line and he helped her to loosen up.

Attempts to pair him with Vanessa and Holly didn't work... I always wondered why the show didn't test him with Nola or Nadine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I've been watching some GL episodes, and I have little memory of the character of Rose. I like the actress (Alexandra Neill) but I can't think of one storyline of hers. Also, was Elizabeth Dennehy really fired because she looked like Glenn Close in Fatal Attraction? Some people online indicate that it is so. In the episodes I watch, Ed is upset because he feels Maureen is in love with Fletcher. I like this storyline and I wish it had been fleshed out/continued. Also, Carl Tye Evans was such a cutie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think they needed what Alex should have been, but sadly even with the divine Beverlee there I don't think the Alex of the end of her run was needed, let alone how she was written under Marj.

I did enjoy McTavish's Alex and her banter with Hawk, mostly because I thought that material suited Marj.

I liked Fletcher more than most here, but that was down to just finding him a likeable support character and everyday figure. Other than Alex I was never invested in his pairings. 

I don't think Fletcher/Holly was a terrible idea, especially with their media jobs, but giving them a child was a very bad idea and just an example of trying to fit an issue story onto characters.

If they were going to tell that story then it might have made more sense to me with Nadine (Jean Carol would have stayed if she had been given story, IIRC), or even Nola. Nola would have loved that child, but I could see Quint struggling, possibly wanting her to have an abortion (especially after learning the baby would have Down's) and that being a more believable cause for their split than an affair. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I've read Elizabeth Dennehy was hired during a strike period, and the writer (at the time) was unhappy with her as Blake, so she fired because she didn't embody as Roger Thorpe's daughter. And supposedly, Sherry Stringfield was whom they had in-mind prior to the strike, so when the time came, they pounced in hiring Stringfield.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I know some of y'all really like Brooke Kerr, and so I've tried to give her a shot, despite her frequent flat line readings and distracted "did I leave the front door unlocked?" facial expressions. But lord, she is so bad at playing a tough-talking badass that I was actually rooting for Brad today to spill the beans to Drew. 
    • Googling does tend to ruin it.  For those of us who were teens in the late 1970s and early 1980s, you can't imagine how much fun it was to watch the show in the afternoons.  (It came on right after school.)  There weren't any "spoilers" at the time.  We would always try to anticipate how each crime and each mystery would be resolved, and we were ALWAYS wrong, because the stories are filled with so many weird twists and turns.   The head writer (Henry Slesar) and his dialogue writer (Steve Lehrman) invariably toss genuine clues directly into your face in the most unlikely ways, but then they provide a host of "red herrings" to completely confuse you and send you off on the wrong path.  Once the story reaches its conclusion, all you can think is Why didn't I figure that out weeks ago?  lol
    • Does the vault have the original scene and not the short flashback?
    • I appreciate that you are using AI with the knowledge of it's limitations. Some posters take everything it produces as fact.
    • And of course Mama Ru herself appeared on All My Children.
    • The Saturday 8pm slot usually had the lowest rating of the NBC 4 sitcom lineup for some reason. NBC let Saturday night fizzle, They used 9.30 pm to launch 227 and Amen, both of which moved to earlier in the evening but they  kept Empty Nest following GG for several seasons.  Empty Nest should have moved to 8pm with their strongest new sitcom at 9.30, anticipating that GG would eventually falter. Instead they left them there and stretching the sitcom pool too thinly on other nights. When Grand talk over at 9.30 Thurs maybe Night Court and Wings could have been used on Saturday.
    • @Maxim Great to see your mini-reviews again. There are a number of clips on Youtube of Janice's slow mental breakdown, especially as we go into January 1980. Christine Jones is just superb. She played the hell out of that role. Something which isn't referenced as much later on is how Mitch pushed Janice's doubts and mental instability for his own ends...until suddenly he didn't want to anymore (I guess he caught on with the audience and the show became wary). I don't want to post a bunch of clips, but this one has a very good confrontation between Rachel and Janice.

      Please register in order to view this content

      This has a good scene around 7 minutes in where you can see Janice struggling internally with her need to identify herself so much by the men around her, all of which helps lead to her crackup.  
    • It really made Oscar the Doorman seem like an imbecile.   I think the show's unusual format & subject manner is what makes EON often seem less "dated" and "old-fashioned" than other shows from that time period.  It never attempted to be especially "trendy" or "modern" -- and its film noir style is pretty timeless.  
    • Dallas, Dynasty, Knots and Falcon Crest all had good runs but by 85 they had seen better days. I think they were a victim of the format. After several seasons seeing the same characters front and center viewers were bored. What was once fascinating grew predictable. JR, Alexis etc had to be front and center and after a while their schemes and shtick grew repetitive. JR remarrying Sue Ellen, Alexis constantly trying to get he better of Blake etc Unlike daytime, there wasn't the flexibility to bring in other stories and characters and maybe let the likes JR go backburner. That same mentality also invaded daytime with characters like  Sonny and Victor still peddling the same stuff after decades. I guess the same could be said for MSW eg every week Jessica encounters a crime and solves it,but I think viewers come to that format with a different mindset.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy