Jump to content

Y&R: Shocking Role Recast


Recommended Posts

  • Members
Posted

No one can explain to me exactly why Chris Engen is a special little snowflake who must be coddled and protected at all costs, whereas every other actor in daytime deals with on-the-fly and sudden writing shifts everyday. Why is Chris Engen more important and entitled to special treatment than Erika Slezak?

What's more, we have no proof the gay storyline was sprung on Engen - in fact, his co-star says they were told well in advance. Given what we're hearing, it seems obvious Engen was told, brooded on the matter for weeks and then began to call out sick to avoid it before finally quitting. That is completely unprofessional behavior.

And no, Engen should not be accommodated to change a story on his behalf based on racial or religious issues. To say "I won't kiss Male/Female X or a person of color" is something where a soap is always going to say, "okay, bye, we'll find someone who will." Television cannot be dictated to by closed-minded viewers or actors.

It doesn't matter whether you like or hate Maria Arena Bell's work, or Paul Rauch. The creative team is not the issue, how they handle the set is not the issue. The fact remains that Engen refused to play a story for unprofessional reasons that do not add up to anything in the daytime industry - where, like I said, people deal with new stories and love interests every day. Coddling his ignorance because of a fan beef with Y&R management is ridiculous.

  • Replies 899
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members
Posted

Because people are regularly applauded when it comes to "taking a stand" against the evil gay agenda. It's the only prejudice still deemed acceptable in today's society. That's not to say Engen is prejudiced or homophobic, but the fact that society is so willing to overlook those two things certainly explains why they're also willing to overlook the un-professionalism of the situation.

  • Members
Posted

Can you point me in the direction of the facts, because I haven't seen any facts. All I have seen are RUMORS and WHAT HE SUPPOSEDLY DID. Did someone get the facts and the truth and not tell me.

So unless I am totally stupid then no you or Cashton or anyone else don't know the facts. You know the gossip but unless you were on the set and saw it all - you can't say you have the facts.

  • Members
Posted

We now have multiple reports on this incident, and there's clearly more to it after 20 pages. I'm sure your standard of proof for whether or not Engen is a bigot is if we can provide grainy webcam video of Chris Engen personally crucifying gay teenagers on a country road. But there's more to homophobia than the most extreme actions. As many have now said, including some actors from the show quoted anonymously, he was dissatisfied with "dark" storylines for a dark character, and the gay turn was the last straw. He's crippled and possibly destroyed his career over something most working actors in this economic climate would not blink at playing as a performer. That is a bigoted attitude.

I don't believe in being Perez Hilton, always taking the most vicious approach to any delicate situation. But what makes me angry here is watching people defend a performer when the evidence is against him, simply by virtue of "those gays can be uppity."

  • Members
Posted

You're right, but then again, everything we hear these days is strictly rumor. The magazines are too afraid to confirm the who, what, when, where and why, and very often the actors are advised not to say anything. We'll probably never have any sort of confirmation regarding this situation. I certainly don't expect CBS to provide video of him walking off the set, and I also don't expect Chris to twitter: "Yeah, I hate homos." If that's what you're looking for as confirmation, I don't think you're gonna get it. I mean, there comes a point where we can figure out that 1 + 1 = 2 without needing the horse (as in: straight from the horse's mouth) to come out and make the obvious even more obvious.

Personally, I tend to believe the story is true. I sincerely doubt that MAB would agree to do an interview with Nelson if he lied about something as huge/controversial as this just for sh!ts and giggles. Who knows, though.

:lol::lol::lol:

  • Members
Posted

Some people always need to hate somebody. It gives them a meaning in their lives. It can be a gay guy kissing his boyfriend, or a soap actor leaving his role as Victor Newman's son. The one who needs to hate, will hate.

  • Members
Posted

Elsa, I think the one who needed to hate was Chris Engen. He seemed to need it more than his paycheck.

  • Members
Posted

Oh, yes, I forgot. When it's everything else, it's unprofessional bigotry. But when it's a gay storyline, that's just about "artistic integrity."

  • Members
Posted

And what day exactly is MAB interview with Nelson? I am interested to see what she says about the whole matter.

Yup, I read that as well on another board. Co-stars are speaking out about the situation.

  • Members
Posted

I'd be curious to know how everyone would feel if Engen quit his job because he refused to kiss a black woman. What if it made him uncomfortable to kiss her either because he's not attracted to her or because it goes against his belief that interracial relationships are wrong? Would it be as easily overlooked and/or applauded, or would people call him the biggest racist [!@#$%^&*] to ever walk the planet? I'm legitimately curious about that.

I don't care if he's not attracted to guys or if his personal beliefs stand in disagreement of homosexuality. He's not being paid to make out with hot chicks he thinks are attractive. He's paid to act what's on the page, and forgetting everything else involved in this story, the bottom line is that he acted very unprofessionally -- allegedly.

  • Members
Posted

Heath Ledger and Jake Gyllenhall had a plausible reason: they were actors paid to do the job. Sean Penn and James Franco too. And gay men who probably would be revolted at kissing a woman in their spare time have kissed women in film and TV for decades. As for getting a stunt kisser or discretely panning away as they embrace, I would love to see this 1940s style of filming applied to all of Joshua Morrow's love scenes with his scene partners, and then I think we would see just how unnecessary his fans think kisses are.

  • Members
Posted

Did I ever say these things? I must have forgotten. I as a viewer find the story of a straight character seducing a gay man for his own crazy reasons, a far more interesting storyline than 20-year old Luke Snyder becoming the Florence Nightingale of Oakdale. I am not sure if Adam is the right person for the story though, but that's another story.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


  • Recent Posts

    • Vernon is an idiot. Why would he have Sharon in the same hotel that Leslie is staying at?
    • Yes, that out of the blue return was odd. Maybe GG found a forgotten clause in the contract he signed when he was wooed to ABC and they were forced to take him back! Like George Reinholt he talked about the contract that promised him primetime roles. But it was loaded in the networks favor. I think it was Gloria Loring that re-signed at Days on the promise of primetime opportunities, but that was all it was- she was put up for guest spots and TV movies but not necessarily guaranteed that she get the role.
    • I still am baffled by why Monty brought back stunt hire Gerald Gordon in the early '80s out of nowhere for like a year. I haven't found anyone who can come up with a thing he did in that second stint of note.
    • It's interesting to watch this having watched The Doctors. I'm not sure I'm seeing that much of a difference in the characters Gerald Gordon and Anna Stuart played on The Doctors and what they're playing here.
    • I keep forgetting a huge chunk of that year was written by scabs. You're probably right, because by the time the strike was over, they were likely planning an exit for Alan's character as it must have been obvious by then that Bernau was not going to return. If he was still there, it's also doubtful they would have approached MZ and MG about coming back. Wild.
    • And to think the original plan was for David and Lesley to have an affair.  Not only would that have made no sense - Lesley wasn't THAT stupid, lol - but it also would've ruined her and GH.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Week ending March 5 1978 Second season shows are tested CBS finishes first week in March with stronger than usual 1 9.5, but not enough to beat ABC The prime -time ratings pattern continued to hold steady for the week ended March 5, and attention increasingly turns to second season entries as the networks probe one another's weaknesses or cover their own. As usual, ABC -TV won the week, scoring a 20.5 average rating. But CBS -TV was closer than usual with a 19.5 average garnered with the help of several strong specials and movies in addition to some of its dependable series regulars. NBC followed its habit of plummeting when its "évent "entries failed. In this case it was the miniseries, Loose Change, which scored only 24 and 22 shares on Monday and Tuesday, leaving the network with a 16.9 average rating for the week. Looking at new series and new time slots, ABC's Six Million Dollar Man on Monday (8 -9 p.m. NYT) continued to falter with a 22 share, while What's Happening, in its new slot on Saturday (8 -9 p.m.), also remained shaky with a 23 share. Starsky and Hutch is still healthy with a 38 share in its new slot following Charlie's Angels on Wednesday, and How the West Was Won also had a 38 on Sunday (8 -9 p.m.). Against West CBS's Rhoda and On Our Own came in poorly for the second week in a row of face to face competition, with each pulling 25 shares after a 41 share lead in from 60 Minutes. ABC's special two -hour presentation of the upcoming series tryout, Having Babies, scored a 27 share on Friday (9 -11 p.m.) against strong competition from both the other networks (the movie "Ski Lift to Death" on CBS and Rockford Files and Quincy on NBC). For CBS, its new Monday night leadoffs, Good Times and Baby I'm Back, scored so -so 27 and 28 shares respectively. But the second half of the night had its best performance since the new line -up came in- M *A*S *Hwith a 45, One Day at a Time with a 41 and Lou Grant with a 36. Celebrity Challenge of the Sexes and Shields and Yarnell showed no signs of reviving on Tuesday, with 16 shares each, but the new Tuesday movie slot held up with a 41 share from Clint Eastwood's "Magnum Force." The network's entire Saturday line up continued to limp in, as Bob Newhart Tony Randall, The Jeffersons, Maude and Kojak all scored sub 30 shares (with the exception of Newhart's 29, in fact, all scored sub -25 shares). NBC premiered its new Chuck Barris Rah Rah Show on Tuesday (8 -9 p.m.),when it pulled a 24 share. The second episode of Quark had a 27, three points down from its premiere. There might be the temptation to conclude that the 29 share turned in by the National Love, Sex and Marriage Test on Sunday (9:30 -10 p.m.) proves the appetite for "sophisticated" subject matter is not insatiable after all, except that its competition was not only CBS's strong comedy block but also ABC's rerun of "The Way We Were," which pulled a 35 share. Of NBC's other midseason entries -CPO Sharkey, Black Sheep Squadron, James at 16 and Class of '65 -CPO Sharkey turned in the highest score of the week, a 27.   *NBC were in dire straits at this point relying on movies and specials which could hit or bomb in equal measure.  Fred Silverman had his work cut out for him when he arrived that Summer. He favored sitcoms and series as the schedule's foundation and NBC had no sitcoms to build on and few solid series. He also had a big backlog of specials/mini series that had been committed to air. Also NBC had a long standing relationship with Universal so he was forced to work with that studio. He struggled to get quality producers on board as they were either tied into deals with ABC/CBS or were wary of having their shows on the 3rd rated network. He still felt variety had a place on the schedule however and that lead to duds like Susan Anton, The Big Show and Pink Lady and Jeff.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I spent years hoping we would get an oral history like the OLTL book, but it’s too late now with so many having passed away.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy