Jump to content

Y&R: Week of May 18, 2009


Recommended Posts

  • Members

It's a classic soap tale (terribly overused): someone uses someone else for a scheme then falls in love. The fact that it would be two men isn't something that would make it a bomb of a story. All the more because of the reasons I've just outlined.

Who on Earth suggested this absurd tale of Adam being gay? Now that he's been recast, maybe they will go in that direction. But with Chris Engen, that would have never been a plausible story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I'm sitting here and for the last few days look at and read in sheer puzzlement these posts about this possible gay storyline on Y&R and can't believe what I'm seeing. So much blabber and empty talk about something that hasn't even begun. And people already have ideas about it and what they should do. Zero talk about what's actually happening.

With this pace and these kind of comments people are going to run these kinds of tales right into the ground.

Someone said in another thread unrelated to Y&R, it was said in general, stories about gay people on US soaps do not work. Fans will always be disappointed. Someone has yet to prove that statement is false.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think you're both right, at least vis-a-vis Cara Mia's theory, based on what we have seen so far.

To be clear, my assumption (and that of many others, it seems) is actually that Adam is NOT gay or bisexual. My assumption is that he is using someone else's sexual attraction to him as a benefit (like J.R. Ewing, Abby Cunningham...). My assumption is that Adam has no genuine feelings for ANYONE. So, for me, the "unique" part is that he is a sexual user who is "equal opportunity"....he preys not just on heterosexual attraction (Heather), but homosexual too (Adam).

As for the "falling in love" bit...well...that is a stretch. Right now, I agree, it seems implausible. But the recast offers new opportunities in this regard...plus the story is only beginning. So I can't fully evaluate how ludicrous this is until I see what they lay out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Whereas falling in love is totally divorced from reality, this part of the story isn't really good either. I have just told you: yes, Adam is scheming and all, but does he really look like a person who would pretend to be gay? Not in a million years would I believe in that. With Engen. With this new one, it's gonna suck too. No build up, no nothing. And I'm not talking six months build up. For such a tale to work, you would need years...

:D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Sure, Adam might just be using Rafe to get what she wants... but if a man has any interest in another man (and doesn't cringe while doing it) he is at least bi. Unless, of course, they go with the "this is a soap" routine.

Hmmm.... but who else tried these days? We only have the horrible Passanante pissing all over that storyline; and at least with GL it works. So who is to say that it might not work...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

ATWT and AMC both bombed horribly with this storyline. GL is still building their's and since the show is canceled, it won't come into fruition.

They can barely do romance with their straight couples, you expect better with a possible gay couple?

Maria is not a socially-conscious writer either, so who knows what the hell she'll do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

They can do romance... they just chose the wrong couple to give all the attention to. So yes, it sucks...

That's where Hogie and Scottie jump in! :lol:

I don't know what to say; let's just wait and see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Agreed. But he could hide his cringing. I mean, actors do it all the time. So if Adam is an 'actor'...sufficiently focused on getting his goals that he'll now do anything...then he could kiss Rafe, but not show his revulsion. That wouldn't make him bi. The actor would have to very carefully play the revulsion with his eyes and body and when other characters aren't looking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That's too much work for a story. Too much work for a person to make himself/herself believe in it.

Best stories are those organic, simple ones where you Wow! at how uncomplicated yet terrific they are. E.g. people were trying to get off the Island on Lost for several seasons then comes your brilliant twist: We have to go back! That's a story. Not I have to force myself to believe they have to go back.

And yes, I've just quoted Lost as an example. B)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thank you, Elsa. I think I quoted a very nice example.

People probably thought The end of this show will be: they finally leave the Island. But nope. That would be disastrous and would make the show stale: Again on the Island? One more season trying to get off the Island? You are not serious?!?! :rolleyes: Damon & Carlton did a very clever thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Cat herself will be a stumbling block all her own as she vowed to Chad to stay away from him, thus redeeming her of her crime morally. Classic DAYS would have them gazing longingly at each other at Doug's Place or Blondie's, while Liz is serenading the room with a song aptly chosen to represent their feelings of emotional turmoil.
    • From what I just recently watched, they were setting her up to go into future stories. She was Emmy nomination worthy in the material I saw. If some viewers did not like her, the character could have been rehabilitated after that sick storyline. It feels like they destroyed a character for fun and then tossed her to the curb. Spencer had chemistry with everyone. I'm just retroactively angry on Spencer's behalf.  You're right about how Cheryl was often forgotten and pushed aside and I would take Cheryl over Josie. I think soaps need characters like Cheryl. Characters like Josie are way too common. Josie always got on my nerves.
    • CBS was back in third place in 1994/95. That was the season CBS lost NFL broadcasting rights which also cost them several established affiliates in major media markets. 1995 CBS was sold to Westinghouse and Les Moonves arrived. 1995/96 CBS was trying to be young and cool to compete with NBC and Fox, but it was an epic failure and CBS was once again in third place.
    • I tend to think that Chad will actually listen to Jen (this time). And that will be the next stumbling block in their relationship, which will open the possibilities for Cat to seek another member of their love triangle... To iterate my earlier thought, I am also not a fan of the person Melissa Reeves, but the character of Jennifer looks so chic this week, especially in comparison to Hope (and Gabi).  That blunt haircut is a winner.   
    • I think Cheryl was essentially replaced by Josie, and it seems likely that Lemay wanted to bring the Frames back into the picture and for a variety of reasons that it would be McKinnons who would make way for them. Cheryl didn't really get many layers -- she was pretty and kind and sweet and faded into the background so that Scott could participate in the AIDS storyline with Dawn. Looking at the AWHP, other than (not very) shockingly being in love with her mother's adopted son Scott, Cheryl apparently went out with Sam and flirted with much-too-old-for-her John Hudson and MJ's ex-boyfriend/pimp Chad. I know MJ told Mary that she had been a prostitute, but did she tell Cheryl and did she tell anyone about Chad's pimping?   
    • I feel the same way about Melissa Reeves' Jennifer. She just makes the show feel like home by her presence alone. I am perfectly okay with them coming in every once and awhile, which probably fits Reeves' schedule better anyway. Their connections to Salem are still there: JJ, the grandkids, Jack still owning half of The Spectator ... they're perfect recurring characters. All this talk of Jennifer being in the wrong regarding Cat is absurd. Jennifer is not being villainized in any way, shape, or form, she's just being allowed to actually be human, which adds odds to the obstacle of Chad and Cat eventually getting together. All inner conflict. Keep it coming!
    • Hahaha. Jean Hackney, Angelica Nero, and the Falcon Crest henchwomen were all straight out of a James Bond movie.
    • My hunch is what you've described. JFP is likely back working on transitioning the show to a new studio and embracing new technology for its production model.
    • The woman who was the co-chair of Latinas for Trump is now complaining about his targeting immigrants that she thought were "safe." I also read a puff piece from yet another "insider" journalist who lives to normalize fascists - this one with a tech bro who was venting off the record because he thought voting for Trump was cool and would show up the Democrats and maybe we'd get Greenland, but now he's getting upset.  These people still support Trump, and Republicans, they just want to make sure they get credit for being respectable. And they will get it.
    • I really do wish someone could. Just a few characters in very simple backdrops, with very real problems that are just a little larger than life, like the '50s and '60s. All the characters having a level of dignity or respect. And their inner lives are what dominate the story, even if there are outside forces at play.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy