Jump to content

Y&R: Week of May 18, 2009


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Murphy was excellent. That was an alchemy of casting and writing. I liked him from the FIRST SCENE, with that distinctive dialect, and I thought FROM THE FIRST SCENE "Oh, maybe we have an interesting romantic pairing for Kay...how novel".

Ana/Tyra has been a disaster. Mac was introduced BRILLIANTLY -- best introduction in years -- if all would remember how much they enjoyed her wedding cliffhanger appearance. In the time since, her introduction has been lackluster both due to performance, but also because they have kept her in this narrow orbit. Yesterday--with some manufactured flashbacks (where she connected to happier days with Billy) and with a truly inspiring scene partner (Kevin!) she was better. So, it too long for the writing and the direction to support her...but the introduction was fabulous.

P3's reintroduction was brilliant...the shot heard round the world. We now know, for secrecy reasons, that he is going to be light in story for at least a month...since they didn't want to spoil the coup. So no judgments can be made.

The introduction of Chloe was fabulous. She established a full presence when she was a nobody...totally an original character who commanded attention. And then, in the passage of time, they linked her to Esther...but here was a place where actress and writing were in such harmony, she could have remained unrelated and it still would have worked.

The introduction of Eden has been a disaster. The aborted story, contractual falling out with Michael Gross, and two unsuccessful castings of Eden all derailed this.

Noah, on the other hand, is the triumph of casting OVER writing. Not nearly enough has been given to this talented, appealing young man. He's going on a YEAR of being on the show! But Kevin G. Schmidt is such a delight, he's still won a place in the heart with minimal writing.

So, when I put this all together, what it tells me is that new introductions have been MIXED. Some have been successful, others not.

It ONLY works when the writing and the casting and the direction are harmonious...and THAT is a weakness for this team.

ETA: Mary Jane LOOKS like she is a good confluence of writing (mystery story) and casting. While the slow build is sometimes great (it is perfect for Rafe right now), for Mary Jane I think it has been too slow. We haven't been given reason to care...or to think she's *interesting*...until the last few weeks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Excellent episode today, loved those character moments. I loved! loved! loved! Phyllis convo with Nick, this part of their dynamic I can really grow into. It was very genuine; this big sister /little brother complex was adopted during that scene. Loved that as his wife she told him he can open up to her and was very genuine about it, and I loved that Nick just let so much out after that (JM & Sc were great in their respective scenes today).

Loved Chloe giving it to Mac!! She was fed up and EH brought it. "If it was just me I'd say to hell with the both of you" great scene. CF did well again in today's epi she's getting much more adapted in comparison to prior performances.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Clementine was much better yesterday and today and even looked better. In her scenes yesterday with Rikaart she was very comfortable and then today she seemed to step up her game with her scenes with Chloe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Rikaart and Ford are reportedly long-time friends. Therefore, they should have a naturalness, from their real relationship.

It would be customary for them -- especially Rauch, but also her directors -- to give her performance notes. As EP, one would imagine that MAB is also trying to shape her performance (if only from a distance).

One would also assume the writers are watching the show, and trying to [ a ] write more to her strengths/performance style, and [ b ] give her better subtextual notes, so she has a better sense of when to be animated, happy, etc.

If you are seeing growth, then I am hopeful...because it means the "system" (including the actress) can respond to the need for change.

Let's see if this keeps up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I have to agree that his acting always left something to be desired for me... I thought he has a certain strong presence, but he was kind of dead behind the eyes most of the time, always disappointing me. Honestly, I only wanted him around for his looks. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It is about time that Nick acknowledged how he failed Sharon when Cassie died. Of course, everyone continues to gives him a pass his horrific behavior. It is so sickening. At minimum, I am glad that he is no longer consoled by his replacement wife and daughter. Peter Bergman and Sharon Case were really good today. They have a good brother/sister vibe. There is no sexual chemistry there. This triangle is about out of gas and has to end.

I liked Chloe confronting Mac, but damn I am sick of Billy and Mac. Put them together and free Chloe before they make her boring also.

For soaps' sake, Y&R stylists please straighten CF's hair or update her hair style.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Oh so they did sleep together. The retcon was just the medical boards? That makes sense. I think Susan Pratt, while a good actress, was just an unlikeable presence onscreen and soaps wrote to that most of the time. There was some potential for more with her when she returned in that stint, as Pratt was at least interesting to watch and caused some conflict for the stifled Bauers. Instead of pairing her with Alan and then disappearing I might have had her hook up with Danny. I think there was a lot of flirtation with Bolger's Philip, but they never crossed the line.
    • I haven't seen Melchior in the role, but it would be astounding if she's worse than Linn. Her rivalry with Stephanie was sidelined IMO because Linn was one of the few actors who didn't have chemistry with, nor raise her game, when paired with Susan Flannery. To be fair, she did show some signs of life in scenes opposite Darlene Connelly, but way too little too late. It feels like Bell finally woke up after the Thorne switchover and sidelined the Kristin character with Mick to 1 or 2 appearances a week. As a result, the show improved by leaps and bounds after she was inexplicably at the center of the show for most of 1989. Margo is so much more enjoyable when not tied to that albatross. Even Clarke is watchable with less Kristin interaction. She can't exit stage left soon enough. As for the new Thorne, I agree that Norcross feels like a Forrester a lot more than Thrachta, even if the latter is a better actor.
    • The cast said that scenes were filmed over a few weeks, with a preplanned hiatus in the middle, and it was all out of order.  I would *guess* that they used Chandler when they could get him? They also had to work around Leo Howard getting married around the time these episodes were filmed, but I guess they worked it out since Tate appeared.
    • Maybe there was a scheduling conflict or something. He still has the full time 9-5 in Atlanta, right? Julie was there. Idk if Maggie’s gonna be a part of it though 
    • At this point, the best nonpaywall coverage of Los Angeles (and anything political)  is in...the Tennessee Holler https://bsky.app/profile/thetnholler.bsky.social And as always, emptywheel continues to be consistent https://bsky.app/profile/emptywheel.bsky.social
    • Today Monday was the start of people arriving at the funeral, but the service hasn't started yet.  I know this is the nonspoiler thread but I think it's okay to say (in nonspecific terms) that the funeral episodes span a few days.  I won't detail it more here. Just sayin' keep watching.
    • Why am I only now hearing about what happened in L.A., lol?
    • While I agree that Reeves is Jennifer, I honestly do prefer Cady McClain in the role, as I feel she had/has a wider range of acting capabilities than I feel Reeves has. It's the strength of an actor, ultimately, for me, regardless of how I feel about Reeves' political/social views (which I widely disagree with). Plus, not to mention, they costumed Reeves like an old-fashioned frumpy farm/Moron wife, while McClain had some fashion-forward moments.
    • Wait - so no Will, Jack, or Jen at John's funeral? That’s just weird. What was the point of bringing them back then? Did Julie and Maggie even show up? I mean, seriously.
    • From the comment section of this IG post: theonlydaphneeduplaix Over 70 National commercials over my nearly thirty years career and some how I only have my hands on five

      Please register in order to view this content

      . Thank you @cityofllanview for digging deep and finding this @longjohnsilvers commercial from 2000. If anyone feels inclined to dig deep and find more, I’d greatly appreciate it!!!!   https://www.instagram.com/p/DKX9m3ytGIw/ cityofllanview and theonlydaphneeduplaix Now we know Thursday ain't here but here is a Flashback to @longjohnsilvers commercial from 2000 featuring the amazing @theonlydaphneeduplaix make sure to catch her as Nicole on @beyondthegatescbs Weekdays at 2pm on @cbstv and streaming on @paramountplus.                    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy