Jump to content

What is it that you want?


Recommended Posts

  • Members

But see, you also seem to enjoy aspects of shows you watch, unlike some others who still watch shows they hate everything about. thats what i dont understand.

I just... i dont know, if i hated everything about a soap, id quit. Ive done it before, ill do it again im sure. I have too much to do in life than waste an hour a day watching something i hate just to bitch on the internet about it, lol. I like your posts tho Sylph, you point out the bad AND the good.

Really? Wow. Thats....

nevermind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 22
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Administrator

What? It's true. He doesn't discuss any stories or anything specific that is happening on the shows. Therefore, I don't believe he's watching. And I believe his criticisms are fake because, again, he never goes into detail.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrator

I am not sorry if I sound bias. I just want to know Sylph's true feelings and reasoning.

For example, "What is it that you want?"

Well, how about he tells us what he wants. He supposedly watches Y&R, right? What does he want for that show? Of the storylines that are happening, what are things that he doesn't like or like? What would he change? I'm just want to see his POV. If everyone else can specifically talk about a soap, why can't Sylph? I believe my theory is right. I would love to be proven wrong. Sylph, please prove me wrong, dude. What soap(s) are you watching? If it's a soap I don't watch, I will watch that soap for a week and then I'll discuss it with you in the discussion threads. Come on, man, I really want to do this. It's just as the old saying goes, "You have to see it to believe it." Make me a believer that you do watch soaps and can talk about it. LOL I'm not asking for the moon here, I'm just asking for something that every other member here does - Discuss The Soaps. (okay that was a bit cheesy).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

What I want? Soaps with a foot (or just a finger or toe) in the 21st century. That includes:

  • Women who do something other than hootch, cry and get kidnapped. Women who don't get pregnant because they know how not to. Women who actually have jobs and can throw the occasionally punch (even that weak ass one Tea threw at OLTL's Go Red Ball) Soaps are sadly lacking in chick kickassery.
  • The occasional acknowledgment of the outside world. I was really excited by AMC's stories about the Iraq War then they dropped them. I liked the Rinks story but then it became...well we know what it became.
  • Diversity. All kinds and unselfconscious. Two weeks ago, the POTW on House was white and his girlfriend was black. It was no big deal and had nothing to do with the story. It was just the reality of the character's life.

But to the larger question, as a former ABC viewer I finally have come to terms with the fact that as long as Frons is running the network, I'll just have to write off the shows I once loved. I hear about these little flashes of something that gives me hope, then Frons gives me the finger. He did it with Rinks and he just did it again with RJ's non-return. Of course both of those stories were the actors fault, right?

And since were back to demanding viewership credentials from posters, I admit to not taping AMC since Bianca left. However I have watched selected youtube clips of both AMC and OLTL, often to my deep regret.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I want who ever has final say at ATWT (CBS,P&G,Televest,Barbara Bloom etc. etc,) to get off their butts and do something about their show.

* More Character interaction.

* More Cross-story action.

* More then one or two stories shown per day. My mind can handle three or more,LOL!

* Use the vets more before they die or give up and retire.

* Use the HISTORY of the show and not REINVENT it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • The last five or so episodes of season 8 after the Jean Hackney story ended were pretty strong with the Laura/Val friendship breakdown, Ben's PTSD with Val trying to help him, and the start of Jill realizing that Val was as much of a threat to her happiness with Gary as Abby was. I always thought that the Jean Hackney story should have ended at mid season at the latest... and then deal with the fall-out because seeing Ben/Val switch roles with Ben in mental decline instead of Val would have been interesting to explore.  And seeing Val and Laura's friendship suffer also was interesting and should have been explored especially with Karen caught in the middle and Abby both intrigued and amused at the conflict that she didn't cause. However, season 8 was the only Latham run season where Val was well written.  
    • Well, she's not in there sweeping the floors at the end of the night, and you don't bring in an award-winning producer to just sit on their backsides (or hey, maybe you do!). Again, without knowing the specific capacity she's in there working as⏤and it seems as if we are not going to at the present time⏤it's hard to speculate/discuss. I would interpret she's in a role that either would not require being credited, or she's, as others have speculated, is back and not receiving credit for the work she's done. That'd be like saying, per the WGA, all writers must be credited, but as we've seen by those who've worked as fi-core, they don't always receive credit. 

      Please register in order to view this content

       And, if my research is correct, per the DGA, you can request not to be credited for work you do. I could only assume the same would be for the PGA, as well.
    • When Anita read Barbara's letter, it started out with the viewers hearing it in Barbara's voice as Anita read silently. And then Anita saying the next portion aloud while Barbara's voice continued simultaneously. And then ending with Anita alone saying the last part aloud. Excerpt from interview  (link to full interview) The rest may be spoilerish -- Only the nonspoiler part here: I love the idea of reading that letter,” shares Tunie. “And at one point in the script, I think it said that my voice joined her, and [Anita] started reciting the letter from memory because [she] memorized this letter. I suggested to Steve Williford, our director, ‘What if it’s like that moment in Hamilton when Hamilton is writing the resignation letter to George Washington, and then he starts saying it too, and then Hamilton’s voice fades away, and then it’s all George. What if we do something like that?’ And he was like, ‘Oh, my God! I just got chills. Let’s do it!’ So, we did it.” I understood that it worked really well, so I’m really happy about that.”  
    • I think MVJ and Guza made a good team in the launching of the soap, and I'm hoping that the rotation of all stories and characters is maintained once he officially departs from the credits. And so far, Ron C's breakdowns have been decent... but they pop only when he's paired with a good script writer like Jazmin.   I hope once Guza leaves officially... that MVJ is able to reign in Ron C and the dread Jamey G.
    • I read that, but my interpretation was that she is uncredited because it is in a non-production capacity.  In others words, she's not secretly producing, or writing, as some had speculated prior to the confirmation. Her likeliest position would be in a post-production consultant capacity. I assume we agree on this?
    • Errol already confirmed she is back at Y&R and in a non-producing role; this alludes to she is not credited for the role she has.
    • I don't think Lisa served a purpose after the serial killer storyline. The writers never gave her anything to do but be Vicky's nemesis. Joanna Going deserved better. Another example of a character taking over the show and then the writers not having a longterm plan for the character.  Exhibit B: Sally Spencer. Such a missed opportunity. It really angers me how they misused her. She could sing and act and they just threw her away in that sexist nonsense storyline. Once the story was over, they wrote her off. The McKinnons should have lasted for years. I will give the show credit for how they introduced Sandra Ferguson as Amanda. I thought it was expertly done. She comes in and she immediately connected to RKK's Sam. She has chemistry with Matthew and she has realistic conversations with MAc and Rachel. That's how it is done. 
    • Great points, and it has not completely vanished. Leslie on Beyond the Gates fits the trope (she's still not over that Ted lovin' two decades later), though I will say there does seem to be an effort to make her more complex.
    • I understand why people speculate, but I have to say it doesn’t sound very plausible that Jill Farren Phelps would be working at Y&R in any uncredited role. CBS daytime shows are tightly bound by union contracts and corporate oversight, and that kind of informal arrangement would be a major liability in 2025. Before the mergers of SAG-AFTRA and the two WGA branches, it may have been easier to hire someone quietly or off the books. But those days are behind us. With digital payroll, tighter pension tracking, and increased scrutiny from legal and compliance departments, it’s just not the kind of thing anyone can get away with anymore. Most union members, especially producers nearing retirement, would not risk their eligibility or benefits to take an uncredited role. The Producers Guild of America is also very clear about crediting. To even receive the PGA mark, a producer has to be verified through a formal review process. According to their credit certification guidelines (source), "only individuals who performed a majority of the producing functions on a motion picture or television production" are eligible for credit, and those credits must be official and recorded. If someone is functioning in that capacity, they are not supposed to be uncredited. Studios that are union signatories, like CBS and Sony, know better than to skirt those rules. If anyone has a legitimate, primary source confirming that CBS is hiring someone like Phelps in an uncredited production role, I’d honestly be curious to read it. But without that, this just feels like rumor—not reality.
    • I keep thinking about the persistent trend of eroticizing mental illness on Guiding Light. Sonni and Annie were never more compelling, or more attractive to the show, than when they were manic. It played into a recurring theme: strong women undone by their unhinged reaction to sex. The writers were likely inspired by Basic Instinct and the broader wave of neo-noir films in the late '80s and early '90s, where female sexuality was often equated with instability. The result was a crude portrayal, not just of mental illness, but of womanhood itself. Both Sonni and Annie were introduced as sharp, capable women, brought in specifically as formidable antagonists to Reva. They were logical and composed, standing in contrast to Reva’s emotional volatility. That difference made them threatening, but not especially “sexy”—until desire became their undoing. In a very male fantasy, their strength unraveled the moment they slept with Joshua. As soon as they got a taste of Lewis lovin’, they spiraled into scheming lunatics, willing to torch everything to hold on to him. It was part of a larger trend in the culture. Fatal Attraction, Single White Female, and The Hand That Rocks the Cradle all traded on the idea that female desire was dangerous, barely held in check, and always teetering on the edge of madness. Looking back, it's a pretty grim trope. And while it's not completely vanished, I'm grateful we don't see it quite as often today.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy