Members Contessa Donatella Posted April 4 Members Share Posted April 4 (edited) This is kinda funny. Since when does "nosy" Aunt Liz need wiggle room? LOL! I'm kidding, of course. Edited April 4 by Contessa Donatella 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members chrisml Posted April 4 Members Share Posted April 4 I can't seem to find the posts, but I remember someone talking about Another novelisations. Has anyone read them? Do you recommend trying to track them down? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Contessa Donatella Posted April 5 Members Share Posted April 5 By any chance, is anyone here in touch with Mona outside SON? I don't know personally. But the information about them can be found here http://anotherworldhomepage.com/public2.html 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Efulton Posted April 5 Members Share Posted April 5 I didn’t recognize David Bailey as Russ in 1989 but I was still excited that he was brought back. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Xanthe Posted April 5 Members Share Posted April 5 There are two main sets of novelizations. There are the "Soaps & Serials" set, which were part of a whole line in the late 80s and covered the history of a lot of the soaps that were on the air at the time. They were slim paperbacks, each about the same size as a Harlequin Romance. They cover 1967-76 storylines only. The other is the two books by Kate Lowe Kerrigan. I believe we talked here about how publicity for these novelizations annoyed Harding Lemay who thought it gave the impression that she and not he wrote the actual show. These were published in the 70s as well. I bought the Soaps & Serials when they were released, and the Kate Lowe Kerrigan books second-hand sometime later. None of them are books that I would reread for pleasure, but I use them for reference when I am looking for more detail than the AWHP synopses provide -- with of course the caveat that the books are wrong or vague in spots or omit characters and entire storylines. They are interesting for the history such as they are. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DRW50 Posted April 5 Members Share Posted April 5 And Josie was at a real low then - her baby had recently died, her marriage had ended, Sharlene was not in town. Rachel was also alone. Plenty for him to do, even just for one episode. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Wendy Posted April 5 Members Share Posted April 5 I finished watching the first episode of The Pitt (excellent show, by the way!), and the credits had AW alum Joanna Going in the guest roles. Was surprised that she played the sick mother of a suspicious teen son. Time marches on, but I didn't even recognize her! She doesn't look bad, just very different/older than how I remembered her. Inevitable for all of us... Please register in order to view this content 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Paul Raven Posted April 5 Author Members Share Posted April 5 Yes and just a nice nod to the origins of the show and to a time when it was a creative and ratings success. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Reverend Ruthledge Posted April 5 Members Share Posted April 5 (edited) If I remember correctly, the Soaps & Serials AW book series skipped over A LOT of the show's early material. Edited April 5 by Reverend Ruthledge 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Xanthe Posted April 5 Members Share Posted April 5 The first book starts with Missy on trial for the murder of Danny Fargo. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Reverend Ruthledge Posted April 6 Members Share Posted April 6 That's right. Which was 1967. The first three years were completely ignored. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Contessa Donatella Posted April 6 Members Share Posted April 6 (edited) 3 years for something like this, is truly insignificant. It's not like they were some scholarly text. They were pop culture & product tie-ins, and yes, there was history involved but certainly not to be considered an exhaustive study of the show. Edited April 6 by Contessa Donatella 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Reverend Ruthledge Posted April 6 Members Share Posted April 6 Yeah, but for someone like me who is only interested in the first ten years of the show, skipping three years of that ten years is pretty significant. I was interested in reading the origins of the show. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Contessa Donatella Posted April 6 Members Share Posted April 6 Have you read "The Creation of Another World" on the AWHP? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Reverend Ruthledge Posted April 6 Members Share Posted April 6 No. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.