Jump to content

Soaps on Late Night?


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I'm always more than a little reluctant to start new threads on message boards - especially, ones that posit wild questions and theories. Nevertheless, lol...

What do we all think about soaps moving to the late-night hours someday? For example, what if Y&R and B&B (forget about ATWT, since I don't hold much hope for their survival past 2010) were to move out of the usual daytime hours and into the post-"Letterman"/post-"Craig Ferguson" shot? Would there be less direct competition or demands on viewers' time? Would you still watch (live, or on DVR)? Would there be lowered expectations on the part of the networks, possibly result in less interference and more creatively satisfying product?

(Why do I feel like I should offer a hotline or something, lol?)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 36
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Frankly, I'd like them to try darker, more racier serials in late night. I think they'd have more creative leeway to accomplish this in late night too. I know they tried it with that late night Valley of the Dolls serial that aired in syndication in, but at a purely network level, its never been done before. But, oh well, that's never going to happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That's just it. I think the current, existing soaps could become darker and racier if they were moved to late-night. For one thing, we wouldn't have to pretend anymore that each new gay character that comes along is a first for the genre.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

^^^LoL, yep. I'm bored. No harm intended with my rolling eye. But I'll contribute to your thread.

I'd love to see a racier Y&R with all the sex that has been going on lately. A naked Vail Bloom may just win over more fans. Then again Braeden may decide to UP the raunchiness in his scenes, so.....

Well what's another 30 more? LoL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I feel like too much of what we've come to accept and whatever is left of these existing daytime soaps identities would be thrown out of the window id they moved to late night and had to revamp their formats with raunchier content. We've seen how easy it is for the soap purists here to complain, even about minor details, I can't imagine how an extreme shift in content would go over with most hardcore fans, but I may be wrong.

I think it's best to start all new serials, without historical baggage, in late night. Hell, I'm pretty sure they'd probably have better production budgets than most daytime soaps.

I've actually dreamt a long time about a new Dark Shadows revival airing in late night. I think they could really push the gothic drama, and it would be creepy and exciting to watch a serial like that in late night, assuming it's not written like a cartoon, of course.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I've seen so many posters over the years who are bright, creative, well-versed in soap history, and who care deeply about the integrity of the genre. I'd put the shows' chances in their hands a lot faster than I would allow any of the "usual suspects" to take control of the dramas they've already helped decimate. When I returned to university in the 1980s, I created a bible for a new soap and presented it in my screenwriting class. It was in reaction to how badly I saw the network shows being butchered at the time. The creative process was thrilling; a total joy, and I still smile when I remember the positive feedback I received from the professor and my fellow students. I was used to seeing written commentary from professors on my work. This one wrote me a long, complimentary note on the final page of the bible, but also graded it 97%, A+. I was beaming ear to ear for days!

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Thanks. I do wonder if Rose was meant to be more given the caliber of actress they hired. I remembered Sara and Peggy staying longer as they were still on when Soapnet started their repeats. I wonder if that was part of the reason they brought Jake's brother in. 
    • Speculation about Missy Reeves' potential evolution on basic civil rights doesn’t change my opinion of her. My view is shaped entirely by her public social media presence—which I find unpalatable—and I have no interest in learning more beyond that. I simply liked Jennifer’s hair and dress. That’s as far as my admiration goes.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Cheryl was gone before Lemay came back but I agree with your thinking that he would rather a character from a family he introduced to the show than a family he did not originate.  I remember reading somewhere in the early 90's probably after DS left as writer, their was an either a writer or a producer who made a comment that their intent was bring the McKinnon family back to AW.  Would have made sense for the newer viewers from the 80's.  Much like Lemay's attempt to bring the Frames back from his writing in the 70's in his 1988 return
    • DePriest left in January 1988. According to the AWHP, Rose last appeared nearly a year before in February 1987 while both Sara and Peggy appeared as late as October 1987.
    • Annie was not brought in as an antagonist for Reva. Reva wasn’t even on the canvas when Annie first appeared in late 1994. 
    • The speculation……….very entertaining. 
    • I had forgotten that several Days stars came out strong against Melissa. Good for them!
    • That would have made sense. Did all these characters get dropped when DePriest left or had they already been dropped?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy