Jump to content

The Politics Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 45.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Vee

    6816

  • DRW50

    5988

  • DramatistDreamer

    5521

  • Khan

    3459

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

Aaron Schock, who annoys the hell out of me as he spends his time posing for beefcake magazine covers and going around the world mugging for his Instagram, has now decorated his office "Downtown Abbey" style. Only for his staff to get panicked at the decorator wanting to show it off, and shoo the reporter away.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/hes-got-a-downton-abbey-inspired-office-but-rep-aaron-schock-wont-talk-about-it/2015/02/02/1d3f1466-ab1f-11e4-abe8-e1ef60ca26de_story.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I have to laugh at melting mannequin Schock recycling old stale Taylor Swift lines (I'm sure he thinks he's being very very "sassy") over his stupid office, only to learn that one of the idiots working for him was spewing racist garbage on social media. What happened to "haters gonna hate"?

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/congressman-aaron-schock-alleged-downton-abbey-office-haters/story?id=28731489

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=28756347

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The President is asking Congress to authoize war against ISIL. It's time. They are a threat to every country in the world. But does this request go far enough? Someone commented on the article in the local paper, Orlando Sentinel, that they "wished" IS would do something to a Russian national, because Putin would not hesitate to bomb the holy !@#$%^&*] outta them.

http://news.yahoo.com/obama-seeks-war-authorization-congress-fight-islamic-state-141751569.html;_ylt=A0LEVjJueNtUVRsAkZonnIlQ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm definitely pro-vaccination, but it does go against my grain to force a parent to vaccinate. I'm not saying I wouldn't support it, if there is truly no other way, but it strikes me as over stepping by the government and I am pretty liberal.

I felt the same way about allowing young girls to get abortions without parental notification. I'm horrified by the idea of my little girl going through surgery without my having the first idea it's happening. However, the bad apples out there who try to force or shame their young teens into having babies they aren't ready for screw things for the rest of us.

This is basically the same situation. Parents should have the right to decide on their children's medical care, but these relatively few are arbitrarily putting other people's children in danger by not vaccinating, so the government is going to have to step in and take over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I certainly don't want to give the government the power to force any medical procedure precisely because I am pro-choice but anti-vaxxers harm innocent people. Not just kids who are too young to be vaccinated but also cancer patients, organ transplant recipients, people who are HIV+, etc... Why should a teacher undergoing chemo be put at even more risk because some granola mom or Ron Paul wannabe rejects decades of proven science? If you choose not to vaccinate you kids for anything other than medical reasons, then those kids shouldn't be allowed in school (or frankly anyplace where large groups gather but that's impossible to control.)

Honestly, I think the forcing of the issue won't come from the government but from the private sector. No workplace is going to accept this kind of risk without pushback. Once corporate America has to start dealing with the liability issues the hammer's going to come down. I already heard a discussion on my local NPR station about how companies are looking at the legalities of asking for vaccination records for new hires. I think vax records are going to become the new pre-employment drug test.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Giuliani is trying to stay relevant even though we are almost 15 years out from 9/11. The only thing I have to agree with Rudy on is Obama's anti christian comments trying to create moral equivalency so everyone won't notice that all these horrible things in the world are being committed in the name of islam. "A Thousand years ago christians did it too, so people who live in glass houses..."

Ridiculous. For starters it was a thousand years ago, the expiration date long expired, and at some point you expect some sort of enlightenment to kick in even in the Islamic world. They are Islamic terrorists, burning people alive and decapitating them in the name of Islam, shooting cartoonists for Islam. Why does Obama want us to pretend we don't know this? When the mainstream media trots out the "everybody does it" moral equivalency BS for republicans benefit it is lame, the same holds true for Obama trying to pretend we have real world christian parallels to Islamic warriors killing everyone in their path. Beheadings, burning people alive, killing people who won't convert...they are all strictly Islamic things in 2015. Obama was not only tone deaf, he was an idiot when he said that comment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But they were Christian things as recently as the 1960s which means people who lived through those things, like my still very much alive mother, can remember growing up surrounded by the very real activities of Christian terrorists.

Look at the number of people lynched in this country by people who were literally burning the sign of God. It's amazing to me that people refuse to acknowledge the real, heinous crimes committed by Christians in the name of God even as the Klan and other more secular hate groups continue to recruit new members. It may be Islam now but they didn't invent evil and given how the right wing, insurrectionist, hate mongering talk that comes from people who love to talk about Second Amendment remedies is still downright common today, Christians - American Christians especially - don't deserve to point fingers.

Obama was and is 100 percent right to remind the American people that we have no right to the high ground when it comes to extremism.

Edited by marceline
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think he's being practical. There are 1 billion Muslims in the world, so he wants to make sure that we differentiate between extremists and the common people who aren't involved in terrorism. We can't and shouldn't go to war against them all.

I agree that the extremists are a branch of Islam, just like fundamentalist Christians are a branch of Christianity. However those are questions of religion and philosophy and only get in the way of politics and a practical result, imo. Plus. he even has a real point, in the sense that these extremists have probably killed more of their fellow Muslims than they have anyone else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Please register in order to view this content



Georgia 12-year-old becomes internet hit as he brands Obama 'unwilling to protect America'

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2964747/Twelve-year-old-YouTube-hit-BACKING-Rudy-Giuliani-s-claims-Obama-doesn-t-love-America.html

Former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani may have come under fire for saying that President Barack Obama does not love America, but he has at least one 12-year-old backer in Georgia.

Middle school student CJ Pearson made a YouTube video in which he said that the commander in chief had a 'downright hate for the American values our country holds'.

The video, posted Saturday on his channel, has garnered more than 112,000 views as of Sunday night.

He said in his video that if Obama really loved America he would call Islamic State 'what it really is, an assault on Christianity'

The student added that the president, who has ordered airstrikes on ISIS and asked for approval to send limited ground troops, was 'not willing to defend our country against the evil of terrorism domestic and abroad'.

The student said that the president 'wouldn't try to take away what hard working Americans have worked for their entire lives' and 'wouldn't take away the rights of the American people'.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

rolleyes.gif Really?

What in the hell does all this mean, anyway? Nothing. The right purposefully uses these ambiguous phrases to make headlines. It's all smoke and mirrors as far as I'm concerned.

IMHO, President Obama "loves America" (whatever the hell that means) a lot more than the warmonger G.W.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I can't believe that discourse in this country has gotten so dumbed down that people are even debating whether the president loves America. That's such a simplistic way of looking at the world. Does loving America mean ignoring the awful things in our history? You've got Oklahoma wanted to change AP History classes because they aren't "patriotic" enough. All that's going to do is make people in this country less competitive in the global job market. When did this country get filled with ignorant fascists? We can't discuss real issues because six years later right-wingers still can't grow up and accept the fact that they lost the election.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • It really is ridiculous how happy episodes from 40 years ago make me. God, MKA is so young!
    • Holy sh.it. THAT was a damn soap opera. I’m at a loss for words for how good that was.
    • A private elevator penthouse with a spiral staircase to the primary suite.  Sign me up! The only deficit was that various riff-raffs seemed to have easy access to the elevator.
    • April 2025 Episode Rankings A total of 22 Episodes aired this Month Thanks as always @jcar03!  1.) Peter Bergman (Jack Abbott) : 13 2.) Michael Mealor (Kyle Abbott) : 12 *.) Zuleyka Silver (Audra Charles) : 12 4.) Hayley Erin (Claire Newman) : 10 *.) Michelle Stafford (Phyllis Summers) : 10 6.) Eric Braeden (Victor Newman) : 9 *.) Sean Dominic (Nate Hastings) : 9 8.) Courtney Hope (Sally Spectra) : 8 *.) Jason Thompson (Billy Abbott) : 8 *.) Susan Walters (Diane Jenkins Abbott) : 8 11.) Christel Khalil (Lily Winters) : 7 12.) Beth Maitland (Traci Abbott) : 6 *.) Nathan Owens (Holden Novak) : 6 14.) Sharon Case (Sharon Newman) : 5 *.) Amelia Heinle (Victoria Newman) : 5 *.) Joshua Morrow (Nick Newman) : 5 *.) Jermaine Rives (Damian Kane) : 5 *.) Melody Thomas Scott (Nikki Newman) : 5 19.) Michael Graziadei (Daniel Romalotti) : 4 *.) Bryton James (Devon Winters) : 4 *.) Christian LeBlanc (Michael Baldwin) : 4 *.) Cait Fairbanks (Tessa Porter) : 4 *.) Connor Floyd (Phillip "Chance" Chancellor IV) : 4 24.) Melissa Claire Egan (Chelsea Lawson) : 3 *.) Mark Grossman (Adam Newman) : 3 *.) Allison Lanier (Summer Newman) : 3 *.) Christopher Cousins (Alan/Martin Laurent) : 3 *.) Eileen Davidson (Ashley Abbott) : 3 *.) Valerie Pettiford (Amy Lewis) : 3 30.) Tracey Bregman (Lauren Fenmore Baldwin) : 2 *.) Melissa Ordway (Abby Winters) : 2 *.) J. Eddie Peck (Cole Howard) : 2 33.) Camryn Grimes (Mariah Copeland) : 1 *.) Kate Linder (Esther Valentine) : 1 *) Greg Binkley (Elliot Matthison) : 1 *.) Elizabeth Hendrickson (Chloe Fisher) : 1 *.) Judah Mackey (Connor Newman) : 1  
    • Same here.  Anyone who voluntarily left Margo's penthouse set (except to go overseas or to Heaven) was immediately on my blacklist.  lol.  
    • https://x.com/MicheleValJean/status/1919575319146856657  
    • The penthouse was my favorite set... and it changed hands from Margo to Draper/April to Miles/Nicole then to just Miles... before he opted to give that beautiful place for that drab house with the even more drab Beth.  That was a jump the shark moment for me LOL
    • The storyline April and Draper are involved in during the summer/autumn of 1979 seems fairly "benign" but soon turns very serious.  April has a VERY intrusive, wealthy mother (Margo Huntington Dorn).  Margo knows that April and Draper (who've recently had a miscarriage and are theoretically never going to be able to conceive another baby) want to buy a house.  Margo hoodwinks them into buying a house they can't afford.  The house is listed at $100,000 (about $400,000 in today's dollars).  Margo pays the first $35,000 and leads Draper to believe the asking price of the house is $65,000 instead of $100,000.  If Draper finds out his meddling mother-in-law paid 1/3 of the cost of the home and tricked him, he'll be mad as hell.   Meanwhile, Draper has received a job offer from a prestigious New York law firm.  Margo pulls some strings and has the senior partner in the firm rescind the offer, to keep April in Monticello.  If Draper finds out about THAT, he'll be even angrier with Margo than he will be about the house trickery.  All of that is "bubbling under the surface" in the fall of 1979 but will be the next major story, as everything begins to spiral out of control.   Yep, you've got the Karrs and their very basic middle-class house, the Victorian-themed place where Miles and Nicole live, April and Draper's old craftsman house with the exposed beams, the Madisons & their Mission revival house, and Margo with her 1970s-chic penthouse.  Each of the sets is completely different.  And their budget was like zero, lol.  
    • It felt weird and out of place.  I get it. While I agree with those on here that say he's gotten better, it's still really bad. I'm not seeing the "good" acting some see...but I'll give him a B for being better than when he first started. There's potential. I'll leave it at that. 
    • It's like watching paint dry at a slow-ass pace. It's bad acting. Entirely. Excellent? With Claybon? Never. Ever. 

      Please register in order to view this content

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy