Jump to content

OLTL: Discussion for the week November 24-28, 2008


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 67
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I definitely think RC is going back to what he has done well if last week's smart character stories were any indication, but I get the sense that the unsteady balance of the Todd and baby stories could fall apart and be boring again at any moment. Or worse, the Todd story could get more offensive. And we haven't gotten to the Montez story, which sssuuuuucckkksss.

I loved last week but I hope that can be sustained and the show continues being that thoughtful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The last week and a half or so have been so amazing on OLTL that I just hope they can even kind of sustain it during this short week. The fallout from the hideous "tarty" s/l has been amazing. I wonder if there's any plans in the works to bring back Marty's "dead" husband Patrick. It seemed for a while that there were rumblings of that. Anything would be better than putting her with John. . . so boring. It might be interesting . . . if in her amesiac state, that Marty returned to her promsicuous ways . . .would be a nod to history and not out of character. I just hope the good writing and acting continues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I finally caught up a week and a half on a Sunday afternoon LOL.

There was more drama, definitely. And I do love how much better Bree is in her scenes, as I've always liked her as a distraught Jessica than a demented gloating Tess (although a distraught, imprisoned Tess was great last Thursday and Friday). I wish Ron had incorporated her motive more, and thus her humanity more, in her scenes with Natalie and Jared. Back when she was completely one-dimensional.

I also love love love how Ron decided to show Todd's reaction to this. That was pretty genius. I like to sympathize with crazy people. It not only fleshes them out but makes great television.

The only thing is, I don't see where Marty can go from here. She's not interesting at all, even with the possible storyline of finding her memory and joshua's supposition that Patrick isn't really dead. (Wasn't that Thorsten Kaye in the picture shown on Friday?) I wish she'd leave the canvas already. She has nothing to offer. And as much better an actress Susan is to Christine, I'm really annoyed at the guttural sounds she's made since she found out the truth. I suppose it was purposeful but dang it, it was really gross.

I don't see the drama in John as a civilian. We all know he'll be right back where he started a few months from now and any PI work he'll probably do as a rogue cop doesn't seem that interesting.

I wanna see Vicki face Todd. That's pretty overdue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I enjoy how the show is building a backbone with it's young characters while shifting the focus back on the vets. They seem to positioning Rex and Brody to end up as tight friends, which is needed for Rex considering he and Michael (both actors) have never had that best bud chemistry. I also enjoy that we'll likely be seeing a square of Gigi/Rex/Brody/Jessica. Keep those four away from Natalie/Jared and the whole of the Vegas and RC is doing his job as far as I'm concerned.

I think John could be more interesting not as a cop for awhile, struggling to decide between Marty and Blair. I hope they eventually pair him with Blair but in the same breath I really don't care either way considering I find John a bore 90% of the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I really don't mind the triangle stuff, but days like today where we have one woman sitting around talking about John and another woman sitting around talking to John and it's all about John bore me to tears. I hope I didn't miss much because after the second segment I flipped the channel. The story isn't even that different.

I am really looking forward to MORE interaction with Rex/Gigi and Jared and Natalie. It just makes so much sense given the great sibling vibe with Rex and Natalie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Today Monday was the start of people arriving at the funeral, but the service hasn't started yet.  I know this is the nonspoiler thread but I think it's okay to say (in nonspecific terms) that the funeral episodes span a few days.  I won't detail it more here. Just sayin' keep watching.
    • Why am I only now hearing about what happened in L.A., lol?
    • While I agree that Reeves is Jennifer, I honestly do prefer Cady McClain in the role, as I feel she had/has a wider range of acting capabilities than I feel Reeves has. It's the strength of an actor, ultimately, for me, regardless of how I feel about Reeves' political/social views (which I widely disagree with). Plus, not to mention, they costumed Reeves like an old-fashioned frumpy farm/Moron wife, while McClain had some fashion-forward moments.
    • Wait - so no Will, Jack, or Jen at John's funeral? That’s just weird. What was the point of bringing them back then? Did Julie and Maggie even show up? I mean, seriously.
    • From the comment section of this IG post: theonlydaphneeduplaix Over 70 National commercials over my nearly thirty years career and some how I only have my hands on five

      Please register in order to view this content

      . Thank you @cityofllanview for digging deep and finding this @longjohnsilvers commercial from 2000. If anyone feels inclined to dig deep and find more, I’d greatly appreciate it!!!!   https://www.instagram.com/p/DKX9m3ytGIw/ cityofllanview and theonlydaphneeduplaix Now we know Thursday ain't here but here is a Flashback to @longjohnsilvers commercial from 2000 featuring the amazing @theonlydaphneeduplaix make sure to catch her as Nicole on @beyondthegatescbs Weekdays at 2pm on @cbstv and streaming on @paramountplus.                    
    • Full statement from city of Glendale https://www.glendaleca.gov/Home/Components/News/News/9293/16
    • Has anyone ever totted up how many women on GL slept with both father and son(s)? Reva gets a lot of crap for it but she's far from the only one: Claire Beth Blake Olivia Dina Did I miss anyone?  Also, did Reva ever sleep with Phillip? They always had some "closeness" thing, but I don't know if they ever actually did the deed. If they did, then Reva's the clear winner, with TWO families covered, lol!  
    • I think Long was probably planning to have Claire suffer from Post Partum, but she left the writing staff shortly after Claire had Michelle so that element didn't get explored. And I always assumed that when Claire returned in the late 90s/early 00s.. that she was realizing that she messed up by not staying a part of Michelle's life and became resentful/bitter over her previous choices.  That was my theory.  
    • Jenn was a huge part of the success of Days back in the day, and that contribution shouldn't be dismissed.  With that said, I do think her and Jack's time on the show should remain as occasional visits/drop ins. When Missy returns to play Jenn, Jenn is back to being Jenn.   Jenn in her glory days was head strong, fiesty, and was a live wire.... and her scenes with Jack on Friday was classic Jenn with Jack being the voice of reason.   It was the foundation of their relationship back in the day.    
    • Claire was always tightly wound, I think what Long was going to do is to throw the three into this impossible situation with no bad guys, Mo, knowing how to take care of kids from growing up but unable to conceive and Claire, who didnt know how to take care of kids and was totally focused on her career, gets knocked up.  Ryder took Claire off the deep end as a convenient way to make story for characters he wasnt interested in (though Pratt blames McTavish) with little effort. It was later explained to be a brain tumor (though why was she a bitch again when she returned?) \ Claire did sleep with Rick, she was his first!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy