Jump to content

Daytime's DVR Threat


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 9
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Fascinating! It only goes to show that the future is OFF television, in a classic way. Business models need to shift to habits that are on-demand, and often internet-delivered.

I very much like the low-clutter ads on online streaming programs...ads that CANNOT be avoided easily. Also, the streaming shows are often housed in an 'envelope' that also includes a persistent ad.

The question is whether next-generation DVR-delievered on-demand shows can use a similar "mandatory ad' format (or a for-pay option for those who wish to avoid ads). I think that is the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I dislike the ads on streaming content. I watch EoN at aolvideo and to be honest I would rather pay a nominal fee than constantly being subjected to Geiko ads or whatever. But anyway, the way the networks measure viewers is woefully outdated. Even their timeframe to measure views on DVR is unrealistic. I watch DOOL and sometimes save up 10 episodes to watch in one sitting. I have movies saved in my DVR for months queued up, and theoretically they are not counting me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't know why SoapNet hasn't reserved a Soaps On Demand channel on cable. To be able to to SoapsOnDemand and watch Monday's, Tuesday's, Wednesday's, etc episode of OLTL and then slide over to the Y&R column and pick up last Friday's episode would be SO convenient and I would think the On Demand stations should be able to track views and selections EASIER because it's all our button selections per-episode. On Demand doesn't really have ads, though, but if you go like HBO or Showtime as a premium channel that you have to pay for, they can all get their piece of the pie that way.

Options to watch any number of Soapography episodes, Night Shift, four or five Sunday Night Movie selections, or even those fall premiere catch-up episode things they were doing this season, and you have a GREAT On Demand channel.

I think it would stand to reason that those who subscribe to the On Demand SoapNet would still be viewers of the regular SoapNet channel, but this would be a backup to the backup in terms of catching up on soaps, if you can only sit down to watch on a Sunday morning, when all SoapNet wants to play is Beverly Hills 90210 and One Tree Hill.

I don't have DVR, but subscribe to OnDemand for HBO, Cinemax, Showtime, and HereTV. I don't always tune into those channels, but I pay monthly for the option to have them to fit MY busy schedule. Shouldn't soaps jump on that bandwagon? It would also put the soap viewing back in the hands of viewers, while SoapNet continues to erode its schedule with non-soap programming.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

quartermaine, I am watching EoN on Trueveo...no ads. Although truthfully, I'm not as bothered when it's one 30-second commercial every ten minutes or so as it is when there's a slew of them every five (think Oprah). You would think researchers would look into this. It's far easier to remember that one commercial for Geico than to remember all five that aired in between episode acts. Ads used to be almost a whole minute, but now they are down to 15 seconds.

I have DVRed everything for the past three years. When people ask if I've seen the commercial where...I have to stop them, because I don't watch commercials.

Product placement is also the wave of the future. Not in an embarassingly Campell's Go Red Fashion Show way where Babe is propping the essential vitamins and minerals in a can of chicken noodle, but in an Ugly Betty Amanda Opens a Drawer full of Healthy Choice Dinners and Says Not Another Word kind of way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • And I'm here for it.   Also...YES, PLEASE. 
    • Also, someone knocked over the head (usually in the D Mansion) and imprisoned in the secret tunnel room or whatever it was. I swear that must have happened at least a dozen times the last few years, and each time it drove me crazy! 
    • HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! And here I am rewatching and...

      Please register in order to view this content

    • 5-9   Honestly? There's nothing going on. And yet unlike Y&R, I'm not bored. But I just think that's because of the acting going on as they play the beats in this Liam dying storyline. Well, that and the outfits.   If there's anything I'm liking it's the continued drama of Daphne going after Carter and not letting anyone get in her way. Not Brooke. Not Katie. NO ONE.    And while I love TK in those glasses, I am not here for a Brooke/Ridge/Taylee triangle.    And of course, Luna would try to use this Liam mess to get closer to Finn.   Okay week.
    • The acting during those Sarah scenes on Friday was horrific.
    • So true. Their hypocrisy is on another level. When Anita called Ted a coward because he used Bill as a fixer, I almost choked on my Ritz. And Dani calling Ted worse than Bill as a husband because Bill never pretended to be a good person? Then why stay with him for decades and continue to kiss up to him, Dani? I was glad when Bill told Anita he wouldn't be her punching bag. Not for me. I can think of 100 other actors who would have smoking hot chemistry with LB. Lindstrom does not. I see zero chemistry. None. Joey isn't sexy or scary.   -- Mona was awesome today. -- Why was Eva playing cards in the back room of the casino? -- Can they make Anita any more sanctimonious and self-righteous? -- Dani said Anita had Ted shook. LOL. Really?       No. But I see what you're trying to do. This is a SOAP OPERA. Characters HAVE to make mistakes and sin and screw up and cheat. That's the deal. I understand the concern that we have 2 leading Black men who have cheated on their wives. I do. But I also understand that this is SOAPS 101. Are we going to hear complaints every time a Black character messes up???    
    • Gone are the days where at least once every week, a character would pull a gun on someone (Ron you really turned gun violence into a joke on this show)
    • Oooooo I like these. I like we are on the same page about Little Brownie Man. And I hope to remember this at the end of June to see how much of it came to pass. I definitely feel that the Eva vs Kat story is about to reaaaally get going.    As for the B/C stories, it's funny you mentioned the Joey/Vanessa/Doug story first. Because out of all of those, it is the only one that has enough structure and build to it that it could keep going as a B story that could eventually climax. I think the only POV we don't have in it is Joey's at this point because Month 2 put in the work to give us Doug's and Vanessa's and they are now circling each other and their relationship. And we still need to know Joey's endgame.   Why we gotta pick on Jacob and Naomi? We need that goody good couple. lol. They talked about how they got together. Mind you, very briefly. But we do need to know a little bit more about both. Something I was hoping we were getting by having them in their own stories....him with the crooked cop, her with the lawsuit...but it didn't turn out as hoped. Hopefully, that won't be the case with June though.   Yeah, I want to see more of THAT Ashley.  I finally had to break down and explain to my manager why I keep laughing every time I see the bottle of Febreze at work. The product placement definitely be working.
    • I’m one of those people

      Please register in order to view this content

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy