Jump to content

ATWT: Whatever happened to the Lowells?


Recommended Posts

  • Members

When "As the World Turns" premiered back in 1956, it was a 30-minute soap originally focused on the lives of two closely related families in the fictional town of Oakdale: the wealthy Lowells and the middle-class Hughes.

As the years went on, the Hughes had become one of daytime's most beloved and most prominent families.

But the Lowells were kinda phased out and we don't know the reason why.

So my question is: Whatever really happened to the Lowell family? :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, the Lowells are still on the show, in the form of Emily and Dani (great granddaughter and great, great, grandaughter.) The Lowells really faced a problem from the start as Ellen was the only child and there were no male characters to carry on the name. However, Ellen was a Lowell and the Stewarts were the core family right along with the Hugheses for most of the last 30 years (during the Dobson era they overshadowed the Hugheses.)

I think the Stewarts suffered a lot of problems in that they killed off the two sons so there were only females and the name eventually, except for Emily and Susan ( a Stewart by marriage) died out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The Lowells didn't really die out...there just weren't a lot of them to begin with. With the Hugheses, you had Chris, Nancy, Grandpa, Bob, Don, Penny, Edith, even John. With the Lowells, you had the Judge, Jim, Claire, and Ellen. Two times as many Hugheses as there were Lowells. Jim died, the Judge was phased out with age, Claire died, and Ellen was phased out in the 90s (which was a shame because they started treating her as a contemporary of Nancy when she was really in the Bob, Lisa, Kim, Susan age range).

Honestly, the Lowells just gave way to the Stewarts in the 1960s. Ellen married David and the Stewarts became the new second core family. Which is why it aggravates me that on Wiki someone wrote that the Hughes family is "the only core family that remains." They were the only core family to begin with, dumbasses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Irna Phillips and William Bell can be traced to the root of the problem for Ellen Lowell.

I am a firm believer in that even if I love someone I can look at their faults. I love both Irna and Bill but they made one big mistake - a mistake that cost the show big time in the long run.

They were the ones who started the aging process that aged Ellen too fast. They started it but the later writers in the mid to late 60's really impacted it.

No way in hell should Ellen's son ever been made the same age as Bob. Ellen was just a few years older than Bob when the show began. Even with the casting of Patricia Bruder in 1960 they still weren't that far apart. But suddenly in the late 60's Ellen was old enough to be Bob's mother. There was no way then that the writers could portray Ellen as Penny's contemporary anymore. They had to push her to Nancy's contemporary to make Dan's age work.

I have always found it funny that on many shows mother and son are portrayed by actors who are not too far apart in age with the actress usually older. In the case of Dan and Ellen, John Colenback was actually a few years older than Patricia Bruder.

The writers at AMC have done the same thing with Erica. And that is the reason I am sure we don't see Tara on the show. they have made Tara a grandmother of a teenager while making Erica consistently younger. Jeff was always the older brother, but they deaged Jeff to fit Erica's age recently and so Tara has to stay offscreen. I know that is not the only reason but it sure makes it hard for the writers to bring her back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


  • Community Posts

    • OMG, YES! I'm going to have to download the extended mix for sure with this single. I love all sorts of high NRG music. Actually, I love music in general but I'm more into underground dance stuff. But yeah, she's so hot it's sickeeeeniiiiing. 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I will never watch that show again. 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Until the show brought him back and ruined him anew in the early 00s, the character of Craig Montgomery was definitely put on the road to redemption in his friendship with his ex-wife Betsy Androupolos during mid 1980s ATWT. There were other factors that also helped redeem his character, like his tortured, at times star-crossed romance with Sierra Esteban but his friendship with Betsy (over the vehement objections of Betsy’s husband Steve) and the reaction to it exemplified Craig’s struggles to shed his reputation. Betsy’s insistence that her ex-husband is indeed a changed man and her steadfast loyalty to their friendship got almost everyone who held a harsh judgment against him to reconsider their judgments about Craig.
    • Looking at that cover, did Tristian Rogers and Emma Samms ever have a real life relationship? I know it's the National Enquirer and all...
    • There's going to be a certain amount of freewheeling behavior in any creative space no matter what. It certainly exists in the places I work. A fair amount of it is not okay with me. How you engage with it or don't based on what you feel is right or wrong to tolerate or participate with is down to the individual. But the work I do also isn't nearly as claustrophobic or high-pressure a closed-in environment as the writers' room of a network TV show from 20 years ago. Most of the work I do as a writer is remote and has only a few points of direct contact; if I don't want to engage, I simply don't reply. Most don't have that luxury. I do think you can chalk some of what went down onscreen at Lost to the times generally being very different in the culture in general - the network and creative focus on white leads, white love triangles, etc. above all. But the offscreen frathouse mentality, while also exceedingly and drearily common, reaching such wild heights at a show that prided itself on headlining media criticism courses before it went off the air, on being 'the thinking man's hit' just because it named characters after famous philosophers is... well, also unsurprising. I never thought anyone at that show was a creative genius. I have generally made it a point to avoid following most of the creatives' work since, though some are genuinely talented. I also watched a great deal of the latter half of Lost when it aired once it was given a clear end date, in a period in my life where I had very little to do with my time lol and because I wanted to see if they could possibly square the circle with all the mystery boxes and empty hype they'd built themselves around (I'd watched bits and pieces of the first several seasons). It was hatewatching, and the answer to my above question is they couldn't. Watch it again; for the bulk of the run of the show they simply go back and forth from Point B to Point C, learn nothing and continue to have circular 'character building' flashbacks. It was a formula and it was for treading water. But Lost is still venerated today. Everything it is credited as having done for popular entertainment and storytelling was done first and much better by other shows, Twin Peaks among them and most noticeable. Yet Lost gets the lion's share for making this kind of storytelling marketable and broadly commercial, because it is a show led predominantly by bland white leads embarking on a series of Legend of Zelda fetch quests while propped up with savvy mid-late aughts viral-marketing tie-ins and charismatic showrunners. To me Lost is a how-to manual for making a certain kind of successful four-quadrant hit, not any kind of artistic legacy. This is what always enraged me about the show. Even Ryan's (very well written) excerpt suggests it is settled fact that Lost was well-written and elevated drama. I never felt that way and I still don't. It was poorly done but passed off as high art. Which, fine, you can sell art to the general public by packaging it a certain way onscreen, I understand that and I champion it - but other people have done it better and smarter, to say nothing of more inclusively. It was clear they were winging it in so many ways, yet to this day they claim that ending was some true north for them all along. Come on.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy