Jump to content

Edge of Night (EON) (No spoilers please)


cct

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

The "youth mandate" hurt TEON (and most soaps, IMHO). Since the very beginning of the genre, fans of all ages have made it clear that they love soap characters of all ages. I have never understood how TPTB can be unaware or (just as possibly) indifferent to this fact.

Replacing Maeve McGuire with Jayne Bentzen was a serious blunder. Not only was she a whopping 18 years younger that McGuire, she was a painfully wooden performer. Rona Barrett's Daytimers magazine posted a comment: "Although well liked by her cast-mates, most feel she should have remained a model." Ouch. Nicole never again attained the immense popularity the character has garnered under McGuire. It was like replacing Jacquie Courtney on AW with some of the dreadful actresses who somehow ended up in the role of Alice.

Lisa Sloan was a better thespian that Bentzen, fortunately, but neither Bentzen nor Sloan ever felt like the "real" Nicole to me.

Getting rid of Mandel Kramer as Bill Marceau was another slap in the face, but at least the character of Bill was hitting a believable age to retire from the police force.

As you pointed out, some of the "model hunks" hired by the show simply weren't well cast. I personally found Derek Mallory to be...icky and completely unappealing, but the majority of the performers hired over the years I watched the series were quite good.

The original leading man, Mike Karr, was recast twice, and the show really lucked out there. All three of the actors chosen for the role were fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Nicole's character needed to be retired after Maeve quit the second time.  It was a perfect opportunity bring in someone new for Miles.  Erwin Nicholson had guts hiring Dennis Parker. Henry's material for Derek was uneven although I liked the Jinx story with the former Somerset actress. I thought she shouldn't have been killed off. She fit great on the canvas. Dennis Parker did his best but he was a 70s porn star and once known it was hard to watch his straight love scenes. Erwin hired so many out gay actors though. Good for him.  Henry was absolutely right to keep Raven on and front and center.  The problem was that, in the name of story and mystery, he killed off her mother and she had no other family.  In my mind, the main thing Lee Sheldon should have been forced to do was write additional backstory and bring in character related to Raven.  Alicia Van Dyne and/or Shelly should have been related to Raven or one to Raven and the other to Geraldine.  I thought the actress who played Shelly had potential and loved Chris Weatherhead.  She was Lee/Erwin's best actrees/character and she was never put on contract!  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes, it would have been interesting for Raven to discover a brother or sister tied into a mystery plot.

I've always wondered about Nicholson -working at Edge for many years, how he adjusted to Search. After that he must have retired. 

And the fact that there he was never replaced. No other P&G show kept a producer for that length of time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
  • Members

Thanks for the link, @daysgoby.  I'm always eager to dive into more of Henry Slesar's stuff.  He was such an amazing writer, capable of writing just about any kind of story, but always written with real intelligence and wit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
  • Members

That excerpt stated that upon leaving Edge, Slesar went to work on Somerset, a blatant mistake.

Henry worked on SOM and EON concurrently.

That sort of falsehood permeates a lot of texts about soaps and allows for these sort of errors to be accepted as facts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This is GREAT! Thank you so much for alerting us to this material.

Plus, Slesar worked on TEON until 1983, and Somerset was cancelled in 1976, sooo no. HS did not go over to SOM "after" he left TEON.

The endless errors we find everywhere are so annoying. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thank you. I thought I was misunderstanding the author and perhaps he had left EON at some point and worked on Somerset and had come back to EON. I was hoping the USA thing was correct because I hold out hope that those episode will show up at some point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I always remember what Henry Slesar once told Soap Opera Weekly: "[After EON, I went to work at OLTL], with the caveat that I not turn it into a crime show; yet, at the time, they had two murder mysteries running simultaneously, with two different murderers."

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Yes. I don't know if Lenore was ever asked. Then it became a nun. Thanks. I didn't realize it was in 1987. That timeline doesn't make a lot of sense even if she would have had Ed to interact with. If they didn't ask her back in 1989 and she was willing, what a stupid error. The attempts at these feuds, or even the whole families tied together stuff like Maryanne Carruthers, never had any real impact because of how depleted the Bauers felt even by the mid '80s. And instead of expanding them, which would have been common sense, various producers were just too lazy, or too ashamed, and kept bringing on other families, or bringing in too many people at one time and not knowing how to write for them (the Spauldings in the McTavish era - as SOD said at the time, everyone in the family had the same personality).
    • Wasn't there talk of them bringing back Rita as Gus' mother at one point? Or something?
    • I think they are a part of the same family, although Carla was never really scheming for the same reasons, and once her double life was exposed, she stopped. 
    • Rachel/Ada, Mona/Erica, a mother/daughter at LOVING, these are all examples of the Agnes Nixon "troublesome daughter/put upon mother" trope. Are Carla/Sadie by any chance one of the pairs that make up this trope? Another thing that these 2 shows might have in common. OLTL had a very strong thematic approach to socioeconomic differences between groups of people. Class differences. AW at an earlier point had this too but to be clear it was not as much as OLTL. So that is a similarity but marginal.  Besides that, I see no other comparable things. Paul Rauch was a very different EP at different shows. Oh, I've thought of one more thing. Using actors from the Broadway stage.  But, realistically that was something all of the NY shows had in common. So I don't think it has any uniqueness between AW & OLTL.  
    • When you look at the period between Sweeps, it's as if they tried to maintain a kind of pace where they had a lot of plates spinning in the air & on their fingertips & the whole goal was nothing but to not drop any of those plates. A version of spinning one's wheels. They're not getting anywhere but they give the appearance of a whole lot of activity. I believe it's all about this appearance. At moments they accidentally hit a chord & something resonates but it is a false event.
    • He found the hidden camera and removed the card 
    • Please register in order to view this content

    • I’m not speculating anything, but I admit, I’m getting a little worried about James Reynolds. 
    • I feel like this is what they're doing by creating lots of storylines but their biggest weakness for years is the inability to properly pace these stories and give resolution. A good example now would be the Gio story which has been simmering for months with very little movement. I went from not caring to being invested to not caring again because of how long it's taking for the secret to be revealed. One story like that would be fine but it seems like everything moves at this snails pace on GH. They need to do a better job of rotating the stories so everything isn't in that same treading water phase.
    • However, those of us who watch DAYS have been spoiled. On Peacock there are no preemptions. Not for anything & not in or about any show.  I read somewhere that we Baby Boomers in a way invented instant gratification but then we realized that it was not fast enough.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy