Jump to content

AMC: Wednesday, July 16th


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 44
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

McTrash didn't write Carly/Bobbie, Guza did.

And since when did Kendall let go and move on? She's meddling in Ryan's life right now! Like Carly, Kendall's always got to have things her way or the highway. Ryan can't be with any women other than Greenlee until she gets her seal of approval, Sound familiar? <_<:rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yep she sure is. Also Carly doesn't wear her emotions on her sleeve the way Kendall does, and Carly would NEVER beat herself up over hurting people she loves the way Kendall does as well.

I mean can we really see Carly feeling she deserves to go to jail for framing someone for something(the way Kendall did Greenlee)? Not in a billion years

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And to think I was worried Pratt would turn her into Carly when B&E have already accomplished that. I agree that Kendall should STFU because all Annie did was tell the truth to the cops.

I hate how TIIC are treating alcoholism like a character trait in the Chandler family. By now, everyone knows its a disease but it doesn't inflict every single offspring of a family.

NuColby still annoys me.

Call me crazy, but I actually saw some chemistry between Aiden & Greenlee for the first time in this episode. Maybe it's just the contrast after seeing so many chemistry-free clips of her and Ryan but with Aiden at least she seemed to spark a little. I love her with Jake, though, and I'm disappointed the show doesn't seem to be going there.

I thought Cassandra and Dre were great in this episode.

Erica/Samuel were boring.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

1. Annie 'told the truth to the cops' to cover her own ass because she killed her brother. That's not honesty, that's selling out a friend to save yourself. And if I were Kendall, I'd be pretty ticked at her too.

2. Kendall was extremely supportive of Ryan's marriage to Annie when she thought it made him happy. Now she thinks (quite rightly, BTW) that Annie's a raving lunatic - AND she knows that Ryan loves Greenlee. Why on earth should she tell him to stay with the crazy lunatic?

3. What shady people has Kendall been involved with? The Cambii, but that is clearly genetics, since they all go for those Kane women in a big way.

4. She seemed pretty thrilled yesterday that Ryan wasn't in love with her anymore, and she was genuinely happy that he'd gotten back his memory. She even assumed (at first) that he'd regained his feelings for Annie and was, again, happy for BOTH of them. Then she figured out he was still into Greens, and she knows that Greens still has some Ryan issues. She wants them to be happy. Is it her direct business? Probably not. But this is KENDALL, for heaven's sake. She gets involved.

I don't think this is going to end particularly well for Kendall, but I don't think she's doing anything wrong or maliciously. She thinks Annie's lost it (and she's right), she wants Zach to watch out for her, and she wnats Ryan and Greenlee to be happy. Why, exactly, is Kendall the bad guy?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't believe Annie said flat out, Zach killed Richie. She just told Jessie what Zach did to him, and he did, so she was just telling the truth. Even if it was to cover her own ass, it was still the truth.

Oh really is that why she made sure no one knew Emma was Ryan's kid, or why she and her mother constantly bullied Annie to get her to stop seeing Ryan?

So what she's still been involved with them. Doesn't matter if everyone in her family has too.

Whether she's Kendall or not, it's still none of her business and she needs to stop meddling in peoples lives.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Motive matters to me. And, I imagine, to Kendall. Annie told the truth to throw suspicion off herself and on to Zach - and given what a good friend Zach's been to her, I don't blame Kendall for being ticked off.

And their relationship changed since then - dramatically. So much so that Kendall was a big supporter of Annie and Ryan marrying. It started changing during the SS story, when Annie joined Fusion and put herself on the line, too.

What kind of soap would this be if people didn't meddle in each others' lives? And do you really think Greenlee wouldn't do the same if the situations were reversed? I don't. Kendall has always gotten over involved with the people she cares about. It's a defining characteristic. I do think she's in kind of a no -win here, but her motives are good. She wants Greenlee and Ryan to be happy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But she still told the truth, it's not like she made any of it up. Kendall's just mad cause Zach could of actually killed Richie. Plus Zach wasn't bothered by it so she should of just called Annie out and leave it at that.

Doesn't change what Kendall did to her and Emma. Whether they made up or not

Doesn't matter if Greenlee would do the same cause this isn't about Greenlee. It's about Kendall, and how she needs to back off, and let Ryan decide what he wants to do. And her motives are not good, she just wants to get back at Annie, she basically said it herself in todays episode.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I agree. Especially after SilkPress got back to her apartment and started to mock Nicole. Her dislike for Nicole and seeing her as a threat to her getting Teddy Bear is growing worse. So I could see her pulling a kidnapping on Nicole at some point. If anything she was going there to poke the bear and got pressed (pun unintended) when the bear gathered her.   Completely understandable. 
    • Beyond The Underwear Oops I mean Gates!

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I swear this entire time I thought Roman knew about the Phillip/Vivian letter lol.  I do like how mature Roman/Kate are as a couple.  It makes me sad the new writers never got a chance to write for John/Marlena. I agree with @AbcNbc247 that the Felicity stuff is a bit after school special-y.  I am pretty sure that (most) of the viewing audience is aware that a grown man should not be shouting at any teenage girl especially one with disabilities.  Just let Xander apologize and move on. Linsey Godfrey was in her Sarah baby voice mode today and it irritates me to no end.   I know it's a cutesy thing her and Xander do but it's annoying. Bringing Kevin back is strange, but I do like the use of history.  I do think Rex probably could have been used instead, but whatever.  I don't care about Rex much either lol.
    • I mean over the past decades. But I do agree that in recent years now, the writing is not working for them as well as it used to then. It's same old, same old...which is what made the Damian storyline refreshing. At least for me.   
    • Did Denise give any interviews where she talked about her first few years on GH... '73-75? I wonder if she had any regrets leaving Days for GH, as from what I've read, the show was in the dumps writing-wise, so am thinking she didn't have great story? Any Leslie story highlights I've seen always start with '76, after Gloria Monty took charge.
    • I know! It's like second verse, here we go again!  Agreed. Certainly there was concern maybe even fear at the highest levels for the very good reason that what they had was so economically successful, so of course this risk was scary but if anyone was brave she was. Yes, he was. I have seen her associated with getting it on the air one other place but no details nor official title. Not the writer or creator so it made me wonder if she functioned as a kind of uncredited ad hoc producer, but then maybe she just supported it. At any rate that is nothing but supposition on my part. No data! Yes, not a surprise anymore but still so frustrating! On one hand I am appreciative that she is included in this book, but scholarship where are you?!
    • that wasnt her point. She wanted to further demonize Ted; that was the main focus of their talk. She wants to ensure that Nicole leaves him so that he's free and single to be with her. At this point, I dont think she really cares what Nicole thinks of her; she just wants her out of the way Eva is Nicole's stepdaughter and is a Dupree by association. If Nicole takes Ted back then its reasonable that she would accept his daughter and i that happens, Eva will have welcomed to their country club, be invited to their parties, have access to their resources, etc....much like Andre whom also isnt a blood Dupree but is accepted by them via Nicole. Eva got what she got from Anita bc of Hayley. I think its important to remember that context bc they just dealt with an interloper that infiltrated their ranks and hurt her daughter in the worse way. Now you have another unfortunate girl positioned to do the same to her other daughter. The feelings are still too fresh and she doesnt want Eva to get the idea that she would ever be allowed the opportunity to play them again
    • Oh I've seem this! That's part of why I'm curious! The show could put EastEnders to shame on the gangster Aspect! Oh I've seem this! That's part of why I'm curious! The show could put EastEnders to shame on the gangster Aspect!
    • Eve was one of those characters that had the "Jessie Brewer"role. They had heavy storyline, they burned through it and now they are there for support and a touchstone in the community (Marland wanted to give Jessie story, but I agree with Monty...she best served in her connecting role, and keeping that damn Amy Vining busy so she keeps her nose out of things) So charcters are important and why they should have kept characters like Bridget around (even as she is more volatiles then Eve) who didnt need a big storyline but could have been behind the bar making connections and expostion, but Rauch wanted JEVA/JEVA/JEVA and DRAMA (which to him meant a lot of yelling and stupidity.)
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy