Jump to content

EastEnders: Discussion Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 8.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

I haven't watch EastEnders in forever ... lol

So, how original. Have the gay boy beaten up. What's with Jay and Ben? Are they ... "going there" with them? I feel I missed some context here.

I see Barbara Windsor and John Partridge [Christian] are returning for the anniversary week. Ross Kemp turned it down. LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ben's latest generic coming out/self-loathing story was supposed to pair him with Johnny Carter, a vastly underwritten character mostly there for a weak attempt at an "iconic moment" when he came out to his Muppet-face father last year. The guy who played Johnny sat around for a year doing nothing and wisely decided to try his luck elsewhere. As a result, Ben is stranded in the storyline, so they took what was likely supposed to be with Johnny and instead had him try to kiss Jay. The actors sold it well enough (Jay is very protective of Ben, and someone like Ben, who is pretty much a walking nerve of need, projected his own homosexuality onto the situation), but it was written on the fly.

This ended with Ben nearly forcing himself on Abi to "prove" he's straight (which won't be addressed, because DTC likely only cares about sexual assault if it involves his favorite chronically depressed Carter) and Jay stuck in the middle.

The sad thing is as much as my brain rejects those types of plots, the actors really do have the chemistry to make that type of Ben/Jay story work (and it would finally give Jay something to do). But I don't think the show is going there.

Edited by DRW50
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

He could, but he seems to be done with the show and is still doing those documentaries.

I'm not sure what Grant would even do (unless he's supposed to get Phil out of the prison). If I was writing the show, he'd come back and accidentally kill Phil, but I'm not writing the show (which is probably for the best...).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

For all the talk of being the new Phil and Grant, Jay and Ben aren't related, didn't grow up together, and Jay is a very handsome guy. The last clip is kind of sad, as Jay spends most of it trying to stop Ben from blowing up and/or getting another pasting. He does it at least 3 times. He's the only person in Ben's life who can even tolerate him. I guess you can see why Ben projected.

The show isn't going there, but as badly as it would end, a part of me kind of wishes they would.

Please register in order to view this content

Edited by DRW50
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thank you so much for posting those! I haven't watched a whole episode in years, so I'm interested to see how Jay's changed. He was a dirty little sh!t just a few years ago, but JB has always been a good actor.

They've been pretty consistent with the general look of the Ben character over the years. Charlie Jones should be proud of himself wherever he is. He basically set the standard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's hard to believe he was the same boy who stole Sam Mitchell's underwear. Now he's wearing the Arthur & Pauline Fowler Memorial Sweater Collection. EE has some hot guys but many of them seem to look like they came out of a catalog, so it's always nice to have someone who is attractive but looks like someone in real life.

I think if the show didn't have problems with younger male characters he might have gone by now, but I think you can do a lot with Jay if you try.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The show had such a solid set of young male actors circa 2010. Jay, Tamwar, Darren, and Peter were all entertaining characters, and I guess Tam is still on the show? They took a huge blow when Charlie Hawkins left and to a lesser extent when Thomas Law left, but they've done very little to rebuild since then, and that's annoying. That creepy Ben recast was horrible. What were the general feelings on the newer Peter?

I'm glad Fatboybus still around but I agree with whoever said that his best storyline was with Mercy years ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The new Peter had no real storyline, although DTC tried to make him unlikeable and unpleasant and elitist, I guess to try to contrast him with Jay (at this time they were doing a Jay/Lola/Peter/Abi quad), and probably because I don't believe DTC has ever liked the Beales anyway. Some fans liked him and some seemed to think he was wooden. The actor, again wisely, quit, so he'll be leaving sometime in 2015.

Tamwar is still around, mostly just to be verbally abused by Stacey and Kat in sidesplitting "comedy" scenes at the market.

I'm still not sure why DTC sidelined most of the younger set just to bring in the Carter kids, whom he also sidelined.

Then again I'm still not sure why DTC implied that bisexuals are evil and mentally ill, and had Steven Beale try to murder his grandmother, and that was almost a decade ago. I guess when you're the best soap producer ever, you can do what you want.

Edited by DRW50
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thanks for the info on Jay/Ben. I wish they would go there with them. But I don't think DTC would tell that story well at all if they did. And of course Ben tried to force himself on Abi. Sigh.

I'm considering watching again but between that and hearing Denise is being wasted ... I don't know.

Why does everyone have to either be miserable or a violent SOB?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • But how is it "apparent" that she signed a new 3-year contract? Your wording had a voice of authority -- as if you knew it was true. A better way to post about it? Say you read online that she signed a new contract, but have no idea if that's true.
    • This interview actually reminds me a bit of Kim Zimmer’s press during the infamous clone storyline on Guiding Light, or Deidre Hall during the possession story on Days. All three were seasoned daytime veterans who made it clear they valued airtime for their characters, not just being part of a romantic pairing. It seems that idea was part of the pitch behind these bigger-than-life plots. They all took big swings in their performances. When I read Kim Zimmer’s memoir, I thought she captured it best — she wanted to be respected for being willing to take those risks. To paraphrase her, she knew it was ridiculous for Reva to think she was pregnant after menopause, but she still threw herself into those scenes and made them real. That’s what really struck me about Victoria Wyndham’s interview too. She responded like a real person. It felt like she was telling Michael Logan that she knew Justine — and a geriatric pregnancy with twins — was totally preposterous, but that she still deserved credit for trying to keep the show alive and entertain the audience. And honestly, I think that's more than fair. Logan is looking for a reductive answer for who is to blame.  And, she's telling him to accept that they were all well-meaning.  Which is not a defense of bad storytelling.  But, I understand that she's frustrated because she interpreted Logan's critique as a lack of commitment, and she wants him to know that she was committed! (maybe not for the best, but committed).
    • Fine, you only had to say so. It's not a problem to me NOT to post this. I have no idea what this means. 
    • Oh, really? I think we're really getting close.  What does "apparently" mean to you? To me, it means that this is something I think has happened but not something I absolutely positively know to have happened. When I use a word like "apparently" as I have here, I am doing so by intent. Can you think of a better way to communicate that?
    • Wow...I was not expecting a montage.   I know SilkPress did not!!! Poor Eva.  Lol. Funnily enough I missed that.     
    • For the record, VW thought having the twins at their ages was absurd & who wanted that story, was some group of fans, who wanted her & Carl to have a chance at having children together. Not any fans that I knew of, but supposedly they existed. 
    • Brandon Tartikoff saved NBC primetime. Brandon Stoddard got ABC Tuesday to rebound and put an end to the Aaron Spelling hit factory.
    • Awwwww Brad. I know I shouldn't, but I feel bad for him 

      Please register in order to view this content

      And yeah, agreed that Dante having animosity towards Gio is very forced and contrived. And it also has me concerned that it means the reveal won't be happening anytime soon.
    • God, I love that woman. Another amazing interview!!
    • We can only guestimate based on other characters. Chelsea was said to be 23 in the first episodee and based on Marttin wanting to run for President in the next election, he's about 30/31. Eva and and Kat are somewhere between that  so Id say closer to 25 or 26
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy