Jump to content

AMC: Pratt's bible


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Ugh, here we go...

No, I never said Babe was going to be raped. Actually, I said that the only reason Babe "Take a Number for Penetration" Carey wasn't redeemed by rape (a McTavish staple I had just pointed out, if you'd read what I wrote) was due to the fact that she already raped another character. And, I don't know what Dixie character you were watching, but a woman coming on to a show, having anonymous sex her first night in town with a guy who happens to be her husband's brother and then questioning which one of THREE MEN is the father of her baby does not convince me that they "always tried to model her character by the Dixie formula" nor was she a "clone of that model."

They modeled the character after the Hot Young Blonde Slut Who Comes Into Town Screwing Every Last Man Within the City Limits formula.

Dixie was a naive country bumpkin who got in way over her head and was used as a brood mare. Babe was a scheming whore who knew exactly what she was doing every single time she made whatever idiotic choice she made and then somehow wound up a victim of the very situation she set in motion with her moronic choices.

As for JR being a hero... unless someone's been smoking copious quantities of crack while watching AMC over the last five years, I don't know how anyone could ever think that! JR's NEVER been painted as a hero. He's ALWAYS been the evil, vicious, dastardly villain who had the sheer gall to be angry at the fact that Babe was a bigamist who slept with his brother and then lied to him about his baby and then ran off with his brother as they kidnapped his baby and told him he was dead. Babe was always the "sweet heroine" who we should've been rooting for as she escaped the EVUL CLUTCHES OF THE DESPICABLE, DRUNKEN, VENGEFUL JR!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 66
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I almost always root for the 'bad guy' over the 'good guy' because i fidn the badies on soaps far more intersting and complex than the poor innocent heroine or the good all the time too close to perfect good guy i cant root for.

When i watch classic soaps i dont ahte the good guys, because theyw ere layerd and not always perfect. But i still like the badies as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But that's the thing. Good and Bad has become all mixed up and jumbled on this show that it's hard to know who truly is the bad guy. I mean, Ryan Lavery, for all the crap he's pulled over the last five years he's been back in town should NOT be viewed as this good guy. JR Chandler, for all the trials he's gone through -- struggling with his addiction, losing his mother three times, being told his baby died in helicopter crash, having an unfaithful wife... Whenever he gets mad, he's viewed as evil.

People on this show should just be HUMANS and that's it. You shouldn't have to be forced by the writing to view/accept this character as Good or Bad. It should just be, which character's point of view do you align yourself with? Then just be entertained and see how it works itself out. But all of these pious, self righteous, morally superior asswipes (Tad, Babe, Ryan, Zach, Krystal) need to sit down and shut up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah, that and Agnes also pissed me off having Tad compare Adam to Ray Gardner. It's like, come the hell on. Give us a little bit of credit. Yeah, Adam can be overbearing, but wanting to send your child to a prestigious boarding school is not the same as beating your son, his mother and leaving said son in the park with a broken arm.

That, to me, was part of the simplistic Good Character/Bad Character broad brush. Tad's a Martin so he's good. Adam's a Chandler so he's bad -- which means he's in the exact same category as Ray Gardner. As if Adam's shown no compassion at all whatsoever to any of the women he's been involved with and the children that have come into his life.

I didn't like that at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree. The problem with AMC is that they don't characterize/write humans they manipulate. Babe has been awful from the get-go but from the beginning the writers have REALLY wanted us to root for her. Around the time she was "killed" the Babe love was almost intolerable with Zarf, Amanda, JR, EVERYONE telling us how wonderful Babe was. If they had just written her as she should have been: a manipulative, golddigging strumpet I think they might have been more successful with the character. It seems that AMC takes the simplistic route with ALL of it's characters. Again during the Crash storyline; they wanted us to HATE Greenlee when frankly, the way AMC is written, the kidnapper is the hero. What I wouldn't give for the days where the characters did what they did, reprocussions were felt and viewers were left to make up their own minds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

See I don't see this as black and white as you guys do. That is what I am talking about in that many of you who root for the bad guys see the people like Tad and others as morally superior. They are not written in the same way as they used to be which does make a difference to some degree but you would call people like Alice Matthews a morally superior asswipe or even Amy Ames or Joanne Gardner. Even Alice Horton and Nancy Hughes and Bert Bauer and Kate Martin would be morally superior asswipes - when they weren't.

The person who said that good and bad have gotten mixed up on soaps said it right. And no it is not Moral Relativism that has killed daytime - it is the lack of definition to characters that has killed daytime.

Back when characters were good or were bad or were gray - the characters had a purpose and were well defined. In families there were good and bad. Even within the Hughes family or the Martin family or the Horton family there was good and bad.

Julie Olson, the Horton granddaughter, was one little bitch in the beginning years of Days. Bill Horton raped his brother's wife. Bob Hughes slept with his sister-in-law. And so on. But in the end they all had to pay for the bad things they did.

Even the great Nancy Hughes wished that it was her daughter Penny who had drowned and not her daughter Susan.

But it never stopped any of them from giving advice to others and to be presented as an example.

Back then all of the characters were defined by roles and by archetypes that fit within the story. You knew how they would react and you knew what to expect from them.

Today I never know half the time what some of the characters are really going to do and what to expect from them. It's like this week the writer wants them to be a villian and then next week they are a hero. Put the character on a path and keep them there. It gets old this year that Todd Manning is a villian and an [!@#$%^&*] and then next year they want to redeem him and have you feel sorry for him.

****************************

And as far as Adam and Ray. I don't think Adam is as bad as Ray is but I wouldn't want either of them as a father. I never feel for Adam and never will. I have seen all the stuff he has done through the years. I like him as a character but I don't feel for him and I always am happy when someone gets the best of him - as he has gotten the best of so many people through the years. I feel teh same way toward him as I do Todd Manning. Neither of them have ever paid enough at this point to make up for some of the bad things they did.

If I feel a character has paid for their crime and they make a change - then I can forgive them and move on. But when they just go back to doing the same things over and over I can't.

*******************************

And yes to the layered thing. I found characters like Tara, Joanne, Alice, and Amy to be very layered. They were good girl characters but they also were not one dimensional characters either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree totally.

Babe keeps doing all these bad things from the beginning and not once have they made her really pay for what she did. They tried to make JR the big bad evil guy to make us feel sorry for her, but it never worked for me.

When they did it with Dixie, I did, but not with Babe.

They can't make me root for Babe, Kendall, Greenlee, Ryan or any of them yet because they still have not paid for the bad things they did yet. They haven't shown me yet they are truly sorry for what they did.

It is another problem of the characterizations and the writing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's a combo of both cause any time a character with any amount of fanbase committ crimes their fans vociferously justify their actions by comparing them to any amount of other characters misdeeds.

If Richie kidnaps JR & takes his bone marrow it's ok because hey, Tad BURIED A GUY ALIVE!

If Sonny shoots a pregnant Carly in the head it's ok cause Luke RAPED Laura!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh I agree. As I have said in numerous places across the Internet - when the genre is dead and gone - THE IDIOTS IN CONTROL will be a big part of the blame - but FANS will also be to blame.

just for stuff like you said right there. The Internet has been good for soaps in some ways but it has also been bad for soaps in big ways. particularly it has allowed fans more of a chance to ban together and form big groups to demand things. Sadly TIIC listen to some of these small groups in decisions just like you said.

But see even years ago the Tad thing you mentioned would have instilled big story for Tad in that he would have had to pay for his crime in one way or the other. Bob Hughes saw his child killed just for committing adultery with Kim. As I said before Jennifer Brooks got breast cancer and Bill Bell said he felt he needed to do that after it was revealed she strayed in her marriage to Stuart and that affair resulted in Lauralee's birth. She lied to him for years about - so he needed something to elicit sympathy for her again. He got it by the time Jennifer was on her death bed all had been forgiven.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Definitely.

Part of the problem is what constitues "justice".

Daytime loves to make characters do increasingly outrageous things & then refuses to let the punishment fit the crime.

And as you said Daytime refuses to write for characters anymore.

Characters can't react to anything cause they've been reduced to plot points who are vehicles for TIIC's agendas & egregious disregard for the audience.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Something that I love about Dani is that despite her issues with Bill, she's always encouraged her daughters to have a relationship with him. I also believe that she does have a great amount of love for him which is why she is so hurt that he's sick. I've loved them including her in his recovery. It feels real and their chemistry is just insane so any chance for more of it is welcomed. That would be the perfect karma. Kat needs to learn boundaries and not be so impulsive, but I still feel like the Duprees are going to clear Leslie. How? I don't know, but that's what I think is going to happen. I feel like she'll get some kind of blackmail over them which will cause them to clear the slate. Of course the show never goes where you expect so I'm sure they'll do something different but I'm definitely curious how she will manage this.
    • Darn you Jane Elliot...you have me crying...that's how superb her acting is in these scenes with Gio. Speak on it.
    • The story has been glossed over and taken over by the lunacy redux. I wonder if they noticed how poorly the ratings are with the Liam story and went all lunacy.
    • @soapfan770Thank you so much for posting that! I know the final season of Falcon Crest is controversial but I thought it was a fantastic swing that mostly worked. The only thing that would've made it better is if they had more money which hopefully could've kept Emma full season. I feel like that was her strongest arc since season one and I wish she had remained so we could've seen her as a mother. I also wish they had more Angela but that was obviously out of their control. As different as it was, I felt season 9 to be very true to the initial gothic roots of the series.
    • You know what? I was just thinking of Klymaxx the day before you typed this and chuckled. I do love how it keeps twisting and turning, getting juicier (Eva hiding everything, knowing her mama did it only for Kat to get the goods, thinking it's Eva...not helped by her hope that it IS Eva) rather than contrived.    This. AM's acting as Eva is just so reminiscent of SMG's version of Kendall on AMC for me. She's totally going to go on to bigger and better things. She has so much nuances in her scenes.    Yeah, I really like that they played the beat of Ty wondering if Jessica was using him. I wouldn't have minded that, but we have done it before so I guess it is nice to see it is not a trick. I do wonder where it will go from here.   Thank you for the tip on Chelesa. I'm already intrigued on the stuff with Madison so Hmmmm.
    • Leslie is going to get off because of Kat.
    • If a soap actor or behind the scenes figure was roasted at any point in time, who would you have at the main table? This topic came about when I imagined a Friends episode (Joey, of course, would bomb at roasting). The Roast of Deidre Hall, circa 1997 Roastmaster: Drake Hogestyn Roasters: Jed Allan, Wayne Northrop, Joseph Mascolo, Eileen Davidson, Christie Clark, Alison Sweeney, Ken Corday, James E. Reilly, Andrea Hall, Jane Elliot, James Reynolds, Shannen Doherty, Wilford Brimley, and Frances Reid.
    • Amanda has been giving it to Abby ever since her and Chance walked in on them together. So great to hear.   I can see that. Lily and Damian are always a highlight to me. 
    • I recall @Chris B asking about this but here is an interview Sheri Anderson did with SOU back in the fall of ‘89: Here is an article that I think is interesting, it is an interview with Shery Anderson, screenwriter of the ninth season THE WRITE STUFF: FALCON CREST’S SHERI ANDERSON: FROM DAYS TO NIGHTTIME By Richard Spencer Soap Opera Update, 1989 : At a time when the success of nighttime soaps is shaky, Sheri Anderson, former headwriter for DAYS OF OUR UVES, ANOTHER WORLD, GUIDING LIGHT and GENERAL HOSPITAL, makes the jump to the evening format with some new ideas to help strenthen the CBS California vineyard based soap opera FALCON CREST. "FALCON CREST is going to have a differnet tone that it never had before," headwriter Sheri Anderson expiains. "The people that I am working with are kind of an interesting mix. The executive producer, Joel Sumow, did the first years of MIAMI VICE and THE EQUALIZER, Bob Cochran, a Harvard MBA,and Cyrus Nowrasteh, who has done a number of features, are story editors. I am co-porducer, with a history in daytime, so we are a real different mix. We all kind of balance each other out in different ways. I am sort of the emotional side (coming from daytime) and they are more the gritty side." A lack of focus is what Sheri attributes to FALCON CREST's problems the last few seasons. "No one , seemed to knwo that the characters' motivations were. Pilar was a real good example. No one seemed to know what she wanted. This season it is clear that Pilar wants Lance. That is really her dream and goal tokeep Lance. She will do anything to do that. She will be making some sacrifices thís season that really jeopardize her relationship with Lance." While Pilar's character may be strongly in place, Maggie's is not. How will the show restructure in light of Maggie's drowning? " We are not trying to replace her, but we are adding another kind of strong heroine character. That character is Laruren Daniels. She's very earthy; married to a construction worker. Lauren. is the sister of Michael Sharp, Gregory Harrison's new character. "Michael is an extremely powerful adversary to Richard Channing. He will be more cynical than Richard and less emotionally motivated. For Michael it is all power and money. The audience will be more sympathetic toward Richard. He will be going through hell," Sheri reveáis with doom in her voice, "...Paying for his past sins " The complete opposite of Richard or Michael's intensity is the the new character of Charlíe St. James."Charlie is every woman's foolish choice," Sheri character sketches. "He's kind of indescribable; charismatic, totally unpredictable, charming, unnervtng. He's coming in as a love interest for Emma. He will be the first man to make Emma feel like a woman. She's really not victimized by him...she’s addicted to him. Charlie's presence will make her a little less flakey this season." But Emma is not the only one in store for major personality changes, also in the categroy is Frank. "We arebringing back somebody from his past," Sheri reveals "there will be a great secret that will come to ight." Speaking of characters from the past, are there any Sheri would like to return? "Everyone is fond of Ana-Alicia in her original role. At this point we don't have any plans to bring her back because we have some other character that are going to take the forefront." And if one thing is going to remain the same, it will be what Sheri recognizes as the theme of FALCON CREST "Quest for control of Falcon Crest. We have people trying to take control, and they are all taking it for different reasons. Some are emotioanl, some are revenge, but they each have a different eason for which they want Falcon Crest. And that is really the pivotal center. It is very earthy." Keeping the core of lite show intact is not the only thing nighttime shows have to do to stay interesting and acording to Sheri"I din't think night time shows have kept paces with changes in the viewing audience," Sheri answers by analyzing what exactly is primetime soaps* problem. ln datyime, you do over the years the shows stay on, but you are adapting to what people are accepting:faster-paced, or slower, or addíng more comedy, depending on the audience, and what they are buying. I don't think some of these shows in primetime have done that "We are trying to make the show as much episodio as it is continuing. We are cutting down the number of scenes in each act to get the audience more involved. But some of the shows, and this happens in daytime al so, don’t let the characters really grow," Sheri certainly made chracters develop during her daytime career, but especially on DAYS OF OUR LIVES, which is the source for her favourite stories of her careen ”When Víctor carne to Salem and revealed tha the was really Bo’s father, it caused such a ripple effect for Kim, Shane, Román, Bo, Hope, Caroline and Sean. I also liked bringing Kayla back for Patch.” Having written for Kristian Alfonso' s Hope (DAYS) and now Pilar on FC, Sheri distínguishes between the two characters. "Pilar is a woman, but Hope was growing up. Hope was more innocent and Pilar is not Pilar has an intelligent strength where Hope did all the wrong things for all the right reasons." Pilar wíll be the only one retuming from her family, while Angela Channing’s appearances will be limited (per Jane Wyman's contract). "But Richard will be taking a very strong role which is very similar to Angela Angelad presence will be felt in every epísode/ Sheri informs. A lot of people complained about the women of FALCON CREST being wishy-washy They certainly aren't this season Sheri emphasizes. "Lauren will be strong, especially after her brother Michael steais Richard’s children and places them with her, Frnak’s step daughter will be very devious, indicateive of Kathleen Turner in “Body Heat” And Gregory Harrison is fabulous," Sheri reports with joy. "He is so different from his character on TRAPPER JOHN, M.D He is very similar to Michael Douglas in the film 'Wall Street'. FALCON CREST viewers will find a much richer textrae, getting away from the glamour and really going to substance and style." Sheri concludes, "it will be a show to watch, We are trying to bring in a new audience, and at the same time, respect our past audience."
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy