Jump to content

Should American soaps rethink their format?


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I was recently talking to a friend who is a huge sucker for romance and who told me that she had given up not just on American soaps but on American tv altogether. She is now mostly watching the so called Asian doramas which are very short mini telenovelas (it seems they have between 13 and 40 episodes). These stories are written and shot finished before the first episode ever airs and when they air it's one episode a day till the show is finished. They often swap around the actors of the different dramas or pair them up again for the new projects. It seems to be mostly quirky love stories with tragic family complications.

A more intermediary case seems to exist in Germany. From what I heard soaps in Germany were on the decline when telenovelas came and started to kick the butt of soaps in the ratings (for example they did a German version of the telenovela that Ugly Betty is based on). Telenovelas started jumping up left and right. And precisely because the ratings were so huge they didn't do the thing that telenovelas are supposed to do, end. Rather than ending the shows it seems that several of them were just spun into soaps because the people had just grown so attached to the characters and supporting characters they wanted to know what would happen next.

However, because of the influx of telenovelas it seems that the soaps shaped up big time in an effort to compete with the telenovelas and the telenovelas kept some of their old properties even as they turned into soaps. Right now the strategy seems to be like this:

- Have one central main characters whose story the show is about

- That character has one One True Love who they will end up with

- Have a cast of quirky and enjoyable supporting characters who scheme, sleep around or do familial support

- The story of the main character as well as them finding their love last a "season" or two. It seems the norm is around 200 to 300 episodes.

- Most importantly when the main storyline is concluded the main character is written off with their One True Love and gets replaced by a new central hero or heroine, their story and their love [i have to say, I was rather fascinated by the story of this one german soap called Tempest of Love which actually has a black central heroine in an otherwise all white cast and that still is one of the highest rated shows in its timeslot with up to 25% viewership]

This structure seems to have drawn in a lot of people who normally wouldn't watch soaps to follow precisely the story of a certain supercouple and how they will get together (and then on the way get engrossed by the soapy antics of the supporting characters). As opposed to just people who enjoy the ever revolving backstabbing and hooking up and breaking up of couples.

Do you think that American soaps could profit from something like this? A bigger focus on romance, intentionally promoted and untouchable supercouples as well as a stronger focus on one central character and one central romance? Generally a more arc-like structure? Premiering a telenovela kind of like a backdoor pilot for a new soap? :huh:

I've always been rather fascinated that there seems to have been no attempt by any of the mainstream channels to try out a telenovela considering how hugely successful the format seems to be in a lot of countries. Do you figure that that is because it is just cheaper to use the already established soaps who already have all their actors and their sets and so on?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 100
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Interesting. But isn´t this precisely the supercouple format DAYS, GH and other shows followed in 80´s? You could always say who is the leading couple in 80´s. They always ended together at the end. And many times TPTB eventually get rid of them or atleast backburnered them when some new couple took the spotlight.

I think it´s too late for this now. In case of DAYS the show is still lead by three main couples created more than 20 years ago. Following the model would mean to backburner/fire them and bring in somone new who would lead the show. But that´s exactly what the show unsuccesfully tries to do for the last ten years! The viewership is too small now and the quality/production values so poor that even a popular new couple isn´t able to bring in enough of viewers to replace the old who would left with the vets. And the vets fans want to see their couple as the leading one, not as a supporter. And there is also a factor of FFing. A lot of viewers simply FF everything not related to their couple so they aren´t even giving a chance to anything new.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But isn't that what people complain about? That soaps these days don't do any classic soap writing anymore and don't do classic soap couples anymore? That everytime a couple arrives that actually has some potential they are treated badly instead of being built up into a real power couple? So why even bother investing in any couple when it's just bedhopping and not romance anymore?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The original American format has all but been neglected on today's American soaps -- Family and Friendship.

Once the focus became about Supercouples instead of love stories, about young and hip demo-reaching story instead of multigenerational story... the family aspect took the last seat in the back of the bus. Now, what we have is pairing young, pretty people and making them into forced insta-Supercouples.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But that seems like the whole problem to me. They put a couple together and either one of two things happens:

1.) They suck and the writers give up eventually and break them up

2.) They are successful and the actors leave the show and the couple as fast as possible in the hope of building on their success

It seems that the writers are constantly pairing people up and see what works. Rather than picking a good story and telling it. Making a slow building couple rather than an insta couple.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That's hardly an improvement if the writing hasn't changed. Besides, the bottomfeeder show of the business is hardly the best choice to really try something new. Chances are that there is constantly somebody behind them and whacking them on the head and never get to see whether any of their attempts actually would pay off if they rush from one attempt to save themselves into the next.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes and did I mention yes!

There are these convenient receptacles for our ire: HW and EP. That is like blaming a president for the state of the country. Clearly, said president earns a share of blame, but there is a whole administration, and whole country underneath that, and each has some responsibility.

We have some very serious analysts and thinkers here at SON. Over the months I've visited, some very good ideas have been floated to explain why we are here today. And MOST of them have little to do with the content of our current shows. They have to do with workforce trends, and changes in the speed of life, and changes in the intergenerational structure of TV viewing, and changes in the popular interest in romance and emotion based stories, and changes in willingness to commit to something daily.

And this list just scratches the surface.

What we see as bad writing and producing and casting and underuse of vets and what have you are more often the symptom, not the cause. Ron Raines has a nice interview in the latest SID (I think), in which he talks about the economic realities and why he, personally, has to be open to continued pay cuts.

Now, I'm not going to say that bad writing isn't a part of this story. But folks, THAT HAS BEEN GOING ON SINCE RADIO. Bad writing is NOT the "new cause".

SOW has this amazing cast list in their latest issue (page 30, 7/8/08), where they highlight all the characters who experienced:

"Was in a mental institution", "Was presumed dead", and "Had a Sudden Child".

For some shows (ATWT, Days, GL, GH, OLTL) seriously half the current cast is highlighted!

That, dear friends, is soap cliche and bad writing...and it stretches back to the beginning of the genre. It is these things that have caused people not to take soaps seriously, and for them to become stigmatized. So you can't blame this bad writing on the present. It has always been there.

Again, I understand why people blame the current regimes. It is much easier to put a face on it that than to blame a system of influences that stretches far back into the past.

But easy doesn't make it right. AND IT DOESN'T HELP US FIGURE OUT A SOLUTION!

Sylph is on the right track. And--though I don't want to be pilloried--Ellen Wheeler and Brian Frons are on the right track! Ellen Wheeler is EXPERIMENTING, and that is what needs to happen. Most of us understand the experiment will not succeed, but GL was dead in the water either way. So kudos to her for buying another year and trying out some new stuff. For Brian Frons, the real innovations (and I don't credit him with the first, really) were Soapnet and GH-Night Shift. Soapnet is a failure...but the whole idea of finding a way to bring soaps into primetime was brilliant. If Soapnet had wider distribution, and better promotion, I think it could have worked better. Still, they're TRYING. Now, in the wake of failure, they are making some bad decisions (MVP, Relative Madness, SNM, cancelling good stuff), but the idea was good and risky. GH-Night Shift is the true future of the form (weekly, time limited, primetime)...so I am glad that has had some success.

Because it is end-times, I think all radical experiments are welcome. Most of them won't succeed...but some of them will...and they will be our "guiding lights" into whatever the future holds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree. RC's stories may seem like high-class "fan-wanking" to some (That words still cracks me up), and I don't mean that in a BAD way. But he's also built up a decade of "business play" with both his colleagues and his employers at the network. It's not just about who can write the greatest stories. It's about how you're perceived, how you pitch yourself to everyone you come in contact with, from the EP to the network execs to the other writers and actors. It's about knowing how the business model of your show works, and being adaptable to that business model in the most efficient way. There's a game that needs to be played, and it's a lot tougher than someone just writing "I have the solution! Write your show like THIS!", summing it up in a few paragraphs, and then bingo, it's fixed.

And believe me. It doesn't matter how many pages the OLTL thread on SON is at the end of the week - if RC hasn't raised the ratings in a year, it doesn't mean squat. (Not to keep using OLTL as an example. It's just the best I can think of where the majority of online fans are happy with the format, but it's not reflecting in the numbers)

I think if current soaps rethink their format, you just end up with a ton of angry fanbases. (i.e. GL) I think the only way a show with a new format would work is if it's a brand new show, where tradition isn't surrounding everything you do, squeezing the lifeforce out of the entire concept. I still think that American soaps, as they are now, need to go away for a few years before soaps with a different format make a resurgence. If people are so used to tuning into their shows like Y&R and GH and Days every day (whether they're happy with them at the moment or not), they're not going to want to check out the "new kid of the block" that's using a different format, even if it IS a stronger concept. But once THESE soaps die out, or the majority of them at least, people will be more willing to check out something new and different in daytime. Especially if there's a long enough gap in between where they have nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

How astutely written!

Yes, yes, yes. This is one of the most interesting experiments going right now! The fans are getting EXACTLY what they want. Not just online, but critically, the mags...and I'm sure the network focus groups...are all suggesting that OLTL is as close to "bullseye" as we're gonna get.

But look at those pesky ratings. NO MEANINGFUL BUDGE. If that continues, Carlivati is (unfairly) toast. Happy fans doesn't mean squat. Only numbers and demos mean anything. If Carlivati can't deliver them, then rather than concluding that the GENRE can no longer deliver them, the suits will likely seek out the next shock-and-awe.

Now, if Carlivati were left alone, and could deliver a consistent product for the next 5 years...I honestly believe this could stem the rate of decline. No network has that kind of vision and patience anymore. The disappearance of daytime divisions (hi, NBC!) means that there are progressively fewer execs who even UNDERSTAND the daypart or care about it. Animals of the primetime market, they do not understand patience, consistency, slow builds.

Yes, yes, yes! The current crop should be allowed to die natural, dignified deaths. The next iteration will not be in the daytime, and it will not be (maybe) on "television" in the classic sense. But like Star Trek or Doctor Who or primetime legal dramas or whatever....it will come back. There is too much inflexibility in the audience of the current shows to accept the kind of wholesale invention that needs to happen.

In that sense it is unfortunate that GL led the charge. GL is the VERY OLDEST show...by this line of argument, it is the last one that should have been touched.

Given the age of the show (from its' radio days), and its' ratings trend, most of its fanbase has actually already died! That may really be just too much history to allow reinvention.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Dear God in Heaven (/KatherineChancellor), maybe blazer is the wrong word - I’m just saying André needs to wear baggy clothes or larger sizes cause he’s a short king and the sizes they’ve chosen for him make him look smaller and shorter than necessary  

      Please register in order to view this content

      btw he’s not even that young, must be around Martin’s age…
    • I think she left before Justin. I remember someone saying her last scene is dancing with Ross at the ball, telling him she's leaving to be with Ben.
    • What a wonderful photo! It really is a shame that Peacock will not show those early years. I know I'd love to see them!
    • With the death of Days and GH actress, Denise Alexander, someone posted this in the Days thread, a '60s-era photo of some of the cast, which lists the names. In the upper left, is a young Susan Flannery, who obviously ended up playing Stephanie Forrester on B&B, who was one of a few actresses to play Dr. Laura Horton [mother to Mike and Jennifer Horton] on Days. Here is a link to the photo: https://boards.soapoperanetwork.com/topic/38014-days-behind-the-scenes-articlesphotos/?do=findComment&comment=2022200  
    • https://parade.com/news/days-of-our-lives-star-susan-seaforth-hayes-pays-heartfelt-tribute-to-denise-alexander-a-friend-to-treasure

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Sorry, there must have been a error, while creating the file. I redone it and it has audio
    • Tamara Tunie was on a local CBS affiliate in Baltimore the other day talking about a few things she had going on, BTG amongst them: "Beyond the Gates" star Tamara Tunie is in Baltimore for the Reginald F. Lewis Museum's 20th anniversary
    • Kobe/Long had their own template and pretty much gutted the cast. As soon as contracts were up established characters were dropped. They needed to free the budget for the new characters. Going back to Ann,I wonder why the Dobsons renewed her contract around 78? After her initial story she became supporting and they didn't seem to want to pursue a romance with Mike. Maybe the feedback was that viewers blamed her indirectly for Leslie's death. If Mike hadn't taken on her case etc. Did she decide not to disrupt her son's life? Seems odd after everything she didn't claim him back. 1976 continues... Joe Werner is just not bouncing back after his recovery as he should, and Sarah, concerned about his sometimes morbid-seeming depression, consults Justin Marler. They agree that Joe is becoming a “cardiac cripple,” and know this kind of overcompensation for illness and overprecaution can not only be a permanently depressed condition but can actually cause a setback for him physically.  Marler releases Joe into Sarah’s care, but it’s soon apparent that just being out of the hospital hasn’t done anything to boost Joe’s spirits about his return to a normal existence. Marler finally lays it out to Joe—the choice has to be his. He can choose to lead a normal, productive life as a doctor and as a husband to the best wife he could have, or he can choose to become an invalid and live on the outside looking in for the rest of his days, sentencing Sarah to the same fate. Realizing the selfishness of what he’s doing to —Sarah as well as the narrowness of the confinement he’s set for himself, Joe begins to see his preoccupation with his illness as the self-pity it really is and decides he’s ready to return to the hospital for a one hour shift each day. Sarah is overjoyed by his turnabout, but full happiness is hers on the day she overhears Joe telling a fearful patient that the world is beautiful and worth any. effort to get back into it. Steve and Adam are thrilled to learn that Cedars has been the recipient of the Levy Grant for expansion of hospital property. But they have learned, as they report to Ed, that the land they were hoping to build the new research facility on, the land immediately adjacent to the hospital, has been purchased by Dr. Justin Marler. Both Adam and Steve feel that Justin is expanding a power base at Cedars and the land purchase is just one more block in Justin’s power play. When Ed asks Marler why he purchased this particular parcel of land, Marler explains that he bought it with the express intention of someday building his own offices and facilities convenient to the major facilities of Cedars. When the subject of the hospital’s needing the land arises, Marler meets with Adam, and they agree that he should realize a fair profit from his property and that an unbiased assessor should be engaged to evaluate the market value of the land so they can agree on a selling price. When Sarah comments on the fact that Marler is to realize a profit on the land, he bitterly replies that no matter what he’s done since coming to Cedars to prove that he has changed. since she last knew him, she refuses to see him as anything but what he was all those years ago. Sarah insists this isn’t true. But Marler then calls Adam for a meeting and informs him that the land is not for sale at any price. As Adam begins to grow alarmed, Marler continues that the site for the new building will be his personal donation to the hospital. As Adam expresses profuse thanks and appreciation, Marler wryly notes that the tax deductions he’ll realize on this contribution to a charitable institution will benefit himself almost as much as Cedars. When Steve Jackson learns that Marler is to be elected head of the research wing that will be built on his property, he expresses the conviction that this was the exact intention of the gift. Adam, however, assures Steve that the donation wasn’t a factor in the hospital  board’s decision, they were concerned only with Dr. Marler’s reputation as a doctor. | After lengthy consultations and meetings. with the hospital  staff, Ed assured by the head nurse that her nurses performed commendably despite the added pressure of the train wreck, presents his findings to the hospital review board. Steve arrives at two possible explanations for the facts. Either Grainger, more active than usual due to the previously delayed medication, reached for the writing pad and inadvertently disconnected the breathing tubes, or he was in a state of extreme upset because of the delayed medication and.in the excitement a surge of adrenalin within his system caused his brain aneurism to start hemorrhaging. " Upon learning that the review board has ruled out negligence in Grainger’s death, Ed tells Rita, who takes her first free breath in a long time. But Ed hasn’t thought to tell Rita that he’s been in touch with Grainger’s attorney, Mr. Schafer, who, knowing that a woman was at the base of Grainger’s investigation, is coming to Springfield to try to find out who the woman - was who walked out on Grainger when he collapsed —in the restaurant. Peggy, learning that Rita’s “forgetting” to deliver Holly’s message was instrumental in their divorce ‘being finalized, tells Ed that Holly wanted to reach him to stop the divorce. Immediately after, Peggy is torn by doubts, wondering if she did the right thing.She confides in Barbara, who then discusses the situation with Ed. He tells her he and Holly have discovered a new closeness now that they are building their separate lives. Barbara quickly contradicts him: Holly is not building a new life. Barbara gently cautions Ed, saying, “People change, feelings change, and what seems right now may not be right a year from now. No decision is irrevocable.” Ed agrees with this. Now that Ben has declared his love for her, Hope finds herself apprehensive, fearing that she might be making a mistake, as she did a few years ago, when she was sure she was in love with her college professor. Explaining that she doesn’t want to make another mistake, she asks Ben to be patient, and he agrees. When Mike expresses his disapproval of Ben’s overstated independence, his need to be beholden to no one, Hope quickly jumps to Ben’s defense, and Mike apologizes. But Ben, surprisingly, accepts Mike’s assessment as constructive criticism. Later Hope, examining her feelings and desires, tells Ben she does love him and wants to belong to him. Later that evening, after they’ve made love, Ben asks Hope to marry him.And, delighted, she replies that she will. At Hope’s instigation, Bert has a family dinner to which Ben is invited, and Hope announces their intention to marry over glasses of wine. Mike politely offers best wishes while Bert thrills the couple with her offer to' make a Christmas wedding for them. Bert later tells Mike he must accept this engagement with good spirits for Hope, and later, seeing the joy she’s feeling, he gives his daughter his approval. But Ben finds another problem on his very own doorstep: his brother Jerry, who announces he’s left home after several bad fights with their parents. He refuses to tell Ben what they were fighting about. As Ben is showering, Jerry borrows his car and goes out for an hour. The phone rings, but Ben can’t hear it. Shortly after, two uniformed officers visit Mike at home to tell him that his late wife’s car has been involved in a delicatessen robbery earlier in the evening. Since Ben bought Leslie’s car, Mike accompanies the officers to Ben’s apartment. Ben curtly informs the police that he had nothing to do with the robbery and makes it clear that he feels they wouldn’t be there if he didn’t have a record and that his exoneration doesn’t prevent his being hassled like any ex-con,as they tell him he has to go to the police station for questioning. Hope tells Ben she called him earlier, and when he replies that he must have been in the shower, she accepts his word unhesitatingly.Jerry finally returns to Ben’s place and under questioning from Ben admits that he robbed the store,explaining that he has debts. Ben is now in a quandary,as he feels he must protect his brother but doesn’t want to be unfair to Hope. He tries to ease the situation by withdrawing $185 from the joint checking account he opened with Hope and repaying the delicatessen owner. He then sends Jerry out of town to stay with a friend. His relief at having solved the problem is short-lived, however, when Mike informs him that, despite the reparations, the robbery was a felony and the police will continue to investigate. Hope is badly upset to learn while making a deposit that Ben withdrew’a sum which Mike tells her is equal to the amount stolen. This shakes her belief that he _was really home when she called, and she goes to him, asking for an answer to put her mind at rest. Ben can’t betray Jerry and asks Hope to trust him, promising she will have the whole story eventually. But Hope can’t accept this; she needs complete honesty and openness in her relationship and without it cannot goon. She painfully tells her father that the wedding is off despite her love for Ben, and tells Bert to stop preparations. Mike goes to Ben, reminding him that half the money in the account is Hope’s and she has the right to an answer. But Ben won’t say any more and refuses Mike’s offer to represent him legally, again stating that he doesn’t need a lawyer, because he’s done nothing wrong.     
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy